Measuring Positive Emotions: an Examination of the Reliability and Structural Validity of Scores on the Seven Dispositional Positive Emotions Scales
- 112 Downloads
The Dispositional Positive Emotions Scales (DPES) are seven separate research scales that measure joy, awe, amusement, pride, contentment, compassion, and love. Despite widespread use of these scales, no comprehensive examination of the psychometric properties of DPES scores has been conducted. In this paper, we examined the internal consistency and structural validity of DPES scores in four independent American samples. In Study 1, exploratory factor analyses indicated that scores on the seven scales had a 1-factor structure, and these scores were found to be internally consistent. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses provided evidence that DPES scores were structurally valid (although evidence was mixed on the Love scale) and that the seven scales were distinct constructs. In addition, DPES scores were found to be internally consistent. Finally, evidence of convergent validity and discriminant validity was also found via comparing DPES scores with those on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Short Form.
KeywordsPositive emotions Trait emotions Joy Awe Contentment
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & the National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational & psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Anderson, C. L., Dixson, D. D., Monroy, M., & Keltner, D. (2018). Are awe-prone people more curious? The relationship between trait awe, curiosity, and academic outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 173–178.Google Scholar
- Dimitrov, D. M. (2011). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Alexandria: American Counseling Association.Google Scholar
- Furr, R. M. (2017). Psychometrics: an introduction. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometrics: an introduction. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Fifth Ed.). London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle. (1991). The “big five” inventory: Versions 4a and (p. 5). Berkeley: Institute for Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
- Kenny, D. A. (2014). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm. Accessed 23 Aug 2017.
- Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Helping the self help others: Self-affirmation increases self-compassion and pro-social behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00421.
- López, A., Sanderman, R., Ranchor, A. V., & Schroevers, M. J. (2017). Compassion for others and self-compassion: Levels, correlates, and relationship with psychological well-being. Mindfulness, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0777-z.
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405-416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mohsen, G., Rasoul, R. E., & Ali, M. (2015). Relationship between dispositional positive emotions and creativity: Synergistic role of trait positive affect. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 4, 42–49.Google Scholar
- Morris, B. A., Wilson, B., & Chambers, S. K. (2013). Newfound compassion after prostate cancer: A psychometric evaluation of additional items in the posttraumatic growth inventory. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21, 3371–3378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1903-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998/2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Authors.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
- Salkind, N. J. (2012). Tests & measurement for people who (think they) hate tests & measurement. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Stellar, J. E., John-Henderson, N., Anderson, C. L., Gordon, A. M., McNeil, G. D., & Keltner, D. (2015). Positive affect and markers of inflammation: Discrete positive emotions predict lower levels of inflammatory cytokines. Emotion, 15, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227-242.Google Scholar