Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Neuropattern, a Translational Tool to Reduce Stress at Work – a Pilot Study

  • 371 Accesses

  • 1 Citations


Changing working conditions demand adaptation, resulting in higher stress levels in employees. In consequence, decreased productivity, increasing rates of sick leave, and cases of early retirement result in higher direct, indirect, and intangible costs. The aim of the study was to test the usefulness of a novel translational tool, Neuropattern, for early detection, prevention, and personalized treatment of stress-related disorders. The trial was designed as a pilot study with a wait list control group. In this study, 70 employees of the Forestry Department Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany were block-randomized and either underwent Neuropattern immediately, or after a waiting period of three months. After the diagnostic assessment, they received an explanatory disease model and individualized online counseling while their physicians were provided with diagnostic results and treatment recommendations. In order to assess possible beneficial effects of Neuropattern, questionnaires regarding health (SF-12), stress perception (PSS), emotional exhaustion (MBI), work stress (ERI) and work ability (WAI) as well as questions on health behavior were included at several time points. The application of Neuropattern resulted in significantly higher increase in measures of mental health and sporting activity and a significantly stronger decrease in perceived stress, emotional exhaustion and overcommitment, as compared to the control group. No such differences were found with regard to subjects’ physical health, current work ability, reward, effort-reward ratio and practice of relaxation methods. In addition, we unexpectedly found that subjects of the experimental group became significantly more pessimistic regarding their future work ability and showed higher rates of sick leave than control subjects did. These changes remained consistent during 3 and 6 months of follow-up. The present study encouraged the application of Neuropattern to early intervention in non-clinical populations. However, further research is required to determine the best operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. Ahola, K., Honkonen, T., Isometsä, E., Kalimo, R., Nykyri, E., Aromaa, A., & Lönnqvist, J. (2005). The relationship between job-related burnout and depressive disorders—Results from the Finnish health 2000 study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 88(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2005.06.004.

  2. Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., & Dallner, M. (2000). Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54(7), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.502.

  3. Badura, B., Schröder, H., Klose, J., & Macco, K. (Eds.). (2010). Fehlzeiten-Report 2010: Vielfalt managen: Gesundheit fördern-Potenziale nutzen. Springer-Verlag.

  4. Bakker, J., Holenderski, L., Kocielnik, R., Pechenizkiy, M., & Sidorova, N. (2012, January). Stess@ work: From measuring stress to its understanding, prediction and handling with personalized coaching. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International health informatics symposium (pp. 673–678). ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2110363.2110439

  5. Bellingrath, S., & Kudielka, B. M. (2008). Effort-reward-imbalance and overcommitment are associated with hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis responses to acute psychosocial stress in healthy working schoolteachers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(10), 1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.008.

  6. Bergström, G., Bodin, L., Hagberg, J., Lindh, T., Aronsson, G., & Josephson, M. (2009). Does sickness presenteeism have an impact on future general health? International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 82(10), 1179–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0433-6.

  7. Bruhn, K., (2014). Optimierung der Depressionsbehandlung durch die Neuropattern™ - Diagnostik. Shaker.

  8. Bullinger, M. & Kirchberger, I., (1998). Der SF-12. SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handanweisung, 65–71. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  9. Bullinger, M. (1995). German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: Preliminary results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med, 41(10), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00115-N.

  10. Cancelliere, C., Cassidy, J. D., Ammendolia, C., & Côté, P. (2011). Are workplace health promotion programs effective at improving presenteeism in workers? A systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the literature. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 395. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-395.

  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  12. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.

  13. Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(14), 1685–1687. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.14.1685.

  14. Cohen, S., & Janicki-Deverts, D., (2012). Who's stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 1320–1334, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00900.x

  15. Cole, J. C. (2008). How to deal with missing data. Best practices in quantitative methods, 214–238.

  16. Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031201.

  17. Crum, A. J., Akinola, M., Martin, A., & Fath, S. (2017). The role of stress mindset in shaping cognitive, emotional, and physiological responses to challenging and threatening stress. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 30(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2016.1275585.

  18. De Jonge, J., Bosma, H., Peter, R., & Siegrist, J. (2000). Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 50(9), 1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00388-3.

  19. De Kloet, E. R., Joëls, M., & Holsboer, F. (2005). Stress and the brain: From adaptation to disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1683.

  20. De Zwart, B. C. H., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Van Duivenbooden, J. C., (2002). Test–retest reliability of the work ability index questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 52(4), 177–181, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/52.4.177.

  21. DGPPN. (2012). Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) zum Thema Burnout. Berlin.

  22. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage.

  23. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.

  24. Graham, J. W., & Schafer, J. L. (1999). On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. Statistical strategies for small sample research, 50, 1–27.

  25. Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031152.

  26. Head, J., Kivimäki, M., Siegrist, J., Ferrie, J. E., Vahtera, J., Shipley, M. J., & Marmot, M. G. (2007). Effort–reward imbalance and relational injustice at work predict sickness absence: The Whitehall II study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.021.

  27. Hellhammer, D., & Hellhammer, J. (Eds.). (2008). Stress: The brain-body connection. Basel: Karger.

  28. Hellhammer, D., & Hellhammer, J. (2011). Stress medicine: From bench to bedside. In C. L. Cooper & A. S. Antoniou (Eds.), New directions in Organisational psychology and Behavioural medicine (pp. 63–76). Furnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

  29. Hellhammer, D., Hero, T., Gerhards, F., & Hellhammer, J. (2012). Neuropattern: A new translational tool to detect and treat stress pathology I. strategical consideration. Stress, 15(5), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2011.644604.

  30. Hellhammer, D., Meinlschmidt, G. and Pruessner, J., (2018). Conceptual Endophentoypes: A strategy to improve the impact of Psychoneuroendocrinology in precision medicine. Invited viewpoint, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

  31. Hellhammer, J., Fries, E., Schweisthal, O. W., Schlotz, W., Stone, A. A., & Hagemann, D. (2007). Several daily measurements are necessary to reliably assess the cortisol rise after awakening: State-and trait components. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.10.005.

  32. Hemp, P. (2004). Presenteeism: At work-but out of it. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 49–58.

  33. Hero, T., Gerhards, F., Thiart, H., Hellhammer, D. H., & Linden, M. (2012). Neuropattern™: A new translational tool to detect and treat stress pathology. II. The Teltow study. Stress, 15(5), 488–494. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2011.644605.

  34. Hero, T. (2013). The Neuropattern pre-/postnatal stress questionnaire (NPQ-PSQ): A new tool to assess pre-and postnatal adversity. Shaker.

  35. Ilmarinen, J. (2007). The work ability index (WAI). Occupational Medicine, 57(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa254.

  36. Ilmarinen, J., & Tuomi, K. (2004). Past, present and future of work ability. People and work research reports. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, 65, 1–25.

  37. Klein, E. M., Brähler, E., Dreier, M., Reinecke, L., Müller, K. W., Schmutzer, G., et al. (2016). The German version of the perceived stress scale—Psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0875-9.

  38. Kompier, M. A., Geurts, S. A., Gründemann, R. W., Vink, P., & Smulders, P. G. (1998). Cases in stress prevention: The success of a participative and stepwise approach. Stress and Health, 14(3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(199807)14:3<155::AID-SMI773>3.0.CO;2-C.

  39. Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M., Bjorner, J. B., & Ware, J. E. (2000). Improving estimates of SF-36® health survey scores for respondents in missing data. Medical Outcomes Trust Monitor, 5(1), 8–10.

  40. LaMontagne, A. D., Keegel, T., Louie, A. M., Ostry, A., & Landsbergis, P. A. (2007). A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990–2005. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 13(3), 268–280.

  41. Lang, K., Koch, U., & Schulz, H. (2004). Zur Validität eines Transformationsalgorithmus’ für die Fehlerwert- ersetzung bei psychosomatischen Patienten. In C. Maurischat, M. Morfeld, T. Kohlmann, & M. Bullinger (Eds.), Lebensqualität: Nützlichkeit und Psychometrie des Short Form 12 / 36 in der medizinischen Rehabilitation (pp. 49–61). Lengerich: Pabst.

  42. Lee, E. H. (2012). Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nursing Research, 6(4), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004.

  43. Lundberg, U. (2005). Stress hormones in health and illness: The roles of work and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(10), 1017–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.03.014.

  44. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P., (1996). MBI: The Maslach burnout inventory manual. Palo Alto.

  45. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E., (1981) The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113.

  46. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter M. P., (2006). Maslach burnout inventory. CPP.

  47. McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x.

  48. Melchior, M., Caspi, A., Milne, B. J., Danese, A., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2007). Work stress precipitates depression and anxiety in young, working women and men. Psychological Medicine, 37(08), 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707000414.

  49. Murphy, L. R. (1996). Stress management in work settings: A critical review of the health effects. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.112.

  50. Naeher, K. L. (2015). Exploration von Therapieverläufen in Beobachtungsstudien: Prädiktoren für Veränderungen im Verlauf einer Therapie und Subgruppenidentifikation in messwiederholten Daten. Hochschule Koblenz-Remagen: Masterarbeit.

  51. National Research Council. (2011). Toward precision medicine: Building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington: National Academies Press.

  52. Nuebling, A., Andersen, H., & Mühlbacher, A. (2006). Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur Berechnung der körperlichen und psychischen Summenskalen auf Basis der SOEP – Version des SF 12 (Algorithmus). Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW).

  53. Nuebling, M., Seidler, A., Garthus-Niegel, S., Latza, U., Wagner, M., Hegewald, J., et al. (2013). The Gutenberg health study: Measuring psychosocial factors at work and predicting health and work-related outcomes with the ERI and the COPSOQ questionnaire. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 538. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-538.

  54. Rödel, A., Siegrist, J., & Hessel, A. (2004). & Brähler, E., (2004). Psychometrische Testung des Fragebogens zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen an einer repräsentativen deutschen Stichprobe. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1024/0170-1789.25.4.227.

  55. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  56. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioural research: A correlational approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  57. Schaufeli, W., & Enzmann, D. (1998). The burnout companion to study and practice: A critical analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.

  58. Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. B., Hoogduin, K., Schaap, C., & Kladler, A. (2001). On the clinical validity of the Maslach burnout inventory and the burnout measure. Psychology & Health, 16(5), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405527.

  59. Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.27.

  60. Siegrist, J. (1998). Adverse health effects of effort-reward imbalance at work. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 190–204). Oxford: OUP.

  61. Siegrist, J. (2002). Effort-reward imbalance at work and health. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Historical and current perspectives on stress and health (pp. 261–291). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  62. Siegrist, J., Wege, N., Pühlhofer, F., & Wahrendorf, M. (2009). A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: Effort-reward imbalance. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 82(8), 1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3.

  63. Stalder, T., Kirschbaum, C., Kudielka, B. M., Adam, E. K., Pruessner, J. C., Wüst, S., et al. (2016). Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: Expert consensus guidelines. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63, 414–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.010.

  64. Tennant, C. (2001). Work-related stress and depressive disorders. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51(5), 697–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00255-0.

  65. Toker, S., Heaney, C. A., & Ein-Gar, D. (2015). Why won’t they participate? Barriers to participation in worksite health promotion programmes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 866–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.968131.

  66. Tuomi, K., Ilmarinen, J., Jahkola, A., Katajarinne, L., & Tulkki, A. (1998). Work ability index (2nd revised ed.). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.

  67. Tuomi, K., Vanhala, S., Nykyri, E., & Janhonen, M. (2004). Organizational practices, work demands and the well-being of employees: A follow-up study in the metal industry and retail trade. Occupational Medicine 2004, 54(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh005.

  68. Unterbrink, T., Hack, A., Pfeifer, R., Buhl-Grießhaber, V., Müller, U., Wesche, H., ... & Bauer, J., (2007). Burnout and effort–reward-imbalance in a sample of 949 German teachers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 80(5), 433–441, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0169-0.

  69. Van der Klink, J. J., Blonk, R. W., Schene, A. H., & Van Dijk, F. J. (2001). The benefits of interventions for work-related stress. American Journal of Public Health, 91(2), 270. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.2.270.

  70. Van Vegchel, N., De Jonge, J., Bosma, H., & Schaufeli, W. (2005). Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: Drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Social Science & Medicine, 60(5), 1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.043.

  71. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP): Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 139–170.

  72. Ware, J. E., & Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 945–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7.

  73. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D. M., & Gandek, B. (2002). How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric. Inc.

  74. Yang, D. J., Kang, D., Kim, Y. K., Kim, Y. H., Yang, Y. A., Cha, S. M., et al. (2013). Reliability of self-administered work ability index questionnaire among Korean workers. Ergonomics, 56(11), 1652–1657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.835073.

Download references


The authors would like to thank Sandra Waeldin for her contribution in planning this project, as well as Lothar Runge, Jenny Vogel and the participating employees of Landesforsten Rheinland-Pfalz for their support.

Author information

Correspondence to Juliane Hellhammer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

JH owns a trade mark protection for Neuropattern in the US and her company provides Neuropattern for clinical trials and patients. CC received a salary from the Stress Center Trier as a study manager during data collection. Data management, data analysis as well as writing the manuscript were part of her dissertation project, conducted externally, not as an employee of the Stress Center Trier. DH applies Neuropattern in his private practice. The authors state that there are no further conflict of interests.

Statement of Authorship

DH, JH and CC were responsible for conception and design of the RCT. CC drafted the manuscript, CC and FG performed the statistical analyses. FG helped with interpretation of the data. All authors helped writing and reviewing the manuscript and have approved the final article.

Electronic supplementary material


(PDF 656 kb)


(PDF 199 kb)


(PDF 393 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Contreras, C., Hellhammer, J., Gerhards, F. et al. Neuropattern, a Translational Tool to Reduce Stress at Work – a Pilot Study. Occup Health Sci 2, 385–407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-018-0025-5

Download citation


  • Work stress
  • Burnout
  • Prevention
  • Conceptual Endophenotypes
  • Personalized Medicine
  • Neuropattern