No Evidence for Enhancing Prospective Memory with Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Across Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
- 2 Downloads
A standard finding in the event-based prospective memory literature is that focal cues are more often detected than nonfocal cues. The multiprocess view of prospective memory accounts for this result by suggesting that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)-mediated executive processes are necessary for nonfocal cue detection while hippocampally mediated spontaneous retrieval processes support detection of focal cues. In agreement with the multiprocess view, previous studies have found that working memory capacity is predictive of prospective memory performance through detection of nonfocal cues, but nonpredictive for focal cues. Because the DLPFC is known to support working memory maintenance, we predicted that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the DLPFC would increase prospective memory cue detection for nonfocal cues when compared with a sham condition. Critically, we also expected an interaction between prospective memory cue type and stimulation such that anodal stimulation would not influence focal cue detection. Our results replicated the standard effect of improved focal compared with nonfocal cue detection. However, there was no significant effect between the sham and active tDCS conditions. Furthermore, we did not find the expected interaction between cue type and stimulation. Not only do our findings add onto the growing literature of tDCS experiments that failed to find stimulation effects to DLPFC, but it is also one of the first studies to incorporate prospective memory with tDCS.
KeywordsProspective memory Working memory tDCS Neural stimulation
We would like to thank Amanda Mullen, Cameron Robins, Alexis Erdington, Thomas Poniatowski, Nowed Patwary, Molly Benkaim, and Peter Whitehead for assisting with data collection.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was approved by the Human Research Institutional Review Board at Arizona State University.
Conflict of Interest
GAB was supported by a grant from the Laboratory for Analytical Sciences during the completion of this work.
- Ball, B. H., & Brewer, G. A. (2018). Proactive Control Processes in Event-Based prospective memory: evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 44(5), 793.Google Scholar
- Burgess, P. W., Dumontheil, I., Gilbert, S. J., Okuda, J., Schölvinck, M. L., & Simons, J. S. (2007). On the role of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory. In Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(3), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Nitsche, M., Bermpohl, F., Antal, A., Feredoes, E., et al. (2005). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation Cerebrale, 166(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gbadeyan, O., McMahon, K., Steinhauser, M., & Meinzer, M. (2016). Stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances adaptive cognitive control: a high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation study. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 36(50), 12530–12536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Rendell, P., Craik, F., & Rose, N. (2018). Prospective memory is a key predictor of functional independence in older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 1–6.Google Scholar
- Hill, A. T., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Hoy, K. E. (2016). Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory: a systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from healthy and neuropsychiatric populations. Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation, 9(2), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- JASP Team. (2018). JASP Version 0.9.1.Google Scholar
- Kliegel, M., Jäger, T., & Phillips, L. H. (2008). Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a meta-analysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues.Google Scholar
- Mulquiney, P. G., Hoy, K. E., Daskalakis, Z. J., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2011). Improving working memory: exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(12), 2384–2389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, J. T., McKinley, R. A., Phillips, C., McIntire, L., Goodyear, C., Kreiner, A., & Monforton, L. (2016). The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on multitasking throughput capacity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.Google Scholar
- Nilsson, J., Lebedev, A. V., Rydström, A., & Lövdén, M. (2017). Direct-current stimulation does little to improve the outcome of working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science, 28(7), 907–920.Google Scholar
- Paulus, W. (2003). Chapter 26 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Proceedings of the 2nd International Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Symposium (Vol. 56, pp. 249–254). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rose, N. S., Rendell, P. G., McDaniel, M. A., Aberle, I., & Kliegel, M. (2010). Age and individual differences in prospective memory during a “Virtual Week”: the roles of working memory, vigilance, task regularity, and cue focality. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 595–605 10.1037/a0019771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rose, N. S., Thomson, H., Kliegel, M., & Rendell, P. G. (in press). Practice is more effective than transcranial direct-current stimulation for boosting prospective memory in healthy young and older adults. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement. Google Scholar
- Strickland, L., Loft, S., Remington, R. W., & Heathcote, A. (2018). Racing to remember: a theory of decision control in event-based prospective memory. Psychological Review, 21, 03.Google Scholar
- Woods, A. J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., Boggio, P. S., Brunoni, A. R., Celnik, P., et al. (2016). A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(2), 1031–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar