Advertisement

Journal of Cognitive Enhancement

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 405–415 | Cite as

Is Cognitive Training Worth It? Exploring Individuals’ Willingness to Engage in Cognitive Training

  • Erin R. Harrell
  • Brandon Kmetz
  • Walter R. BootEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

We assessed how much time individuals would be willing to spend engaging in game-based cognitive training to gain prolonged functional independence. In study 1 (N = 294), participants completed a survey with questions assessing how much time they would be willing to invest in daily cognitive training to extend their functional independence by certain amounts of time using a slider response that ranged from 0 to 100 min. Participants also completed surveys that measured self-perceived health and cognitive functioning, personality, and other demographic variables. Even for relatively small gains, participants reported being willing to dedicate an average of 11 min every day to cognitive training, with some participants willing to engage for significantly longer. The best predictor of willingness to invest time in training was belief in cognitive training efficacy, followed by openness to experience, and participants’ self-perceived cognitive deficit. Study 2 examined the same question in a sample of 120 older adults, this time allowing for open-ended responses. Participants reported being willing to invest significantly more time, ranging from more than 40 min every day to gain just 1 week of independence, to over 2.5 h every day to gain an additional 3 years of independence. Again, perception of cognitive training efficacy was the strongest predictor of willingness to invest time. Results confirm that older adults are willing to invest significant amounts of time to gain independence later in life and have implications for predicting the adoption of, and adherence to, potentially effective treatments for cognitive decline.

Keywords

Cognitive training Games Adherence Temporal discounting 

Notes

Funding Information

This study was financially supported by the National Institute on Aging, Project CREATE IV – Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (www.create-center.org, NIA P01 AG017211). This research was also partially funded by the Bess H. Ward Honors Thesis Award and the HSA Conference Presenter Award from Florida State University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. “A consensus on the brain training industry from the scientific community.” (n.d.). Retrieved from http://longevity3.stanford.edu/blog/2014/10/15/the-consensus-on-the-brain-training-industry-from-the-scientific-community-2/. Accessed 2018
  2. Boot, W. R., Champion, M., Blakely, D. P., Wright, T., Souders, D. J., & Charness, N. (2013). Video games as a means to reduce age-related cognitive decline: attitudes, compliance and effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. “Cognitive Training Data.” Retrieved from: https://www.cognitivetrainingdata.org/
  5. Dennis, S. A., Goodson, B. M., & Pearson, C. (2018). MTurk workers’ use of low-cost ‘virtual private servers’ to circumvent screening methods: a Research Note. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3233954 or doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3233954
  6. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, D. B., Laditka, S. B., Laditka, J. N., Wu, B., Liu, R., et al. (2011). Ethnically diverse older adults’ beliefs about staying mentally sharp. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 73(1), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, L., Myerson, J., & McFadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 715–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green, C. S., Li, R., & Bavelier, D. (2010). Perceptual learning during action video game playing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(2), 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1995). The general self-efficacy scale (GSE).Google Scholar
  12. Mehegan, L., Rainville, C., & Skufca, L. (2017). 2017 AARP cognitive activity and brain health survey. Washington, DC: AARP Research.  https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00044.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitzner, T. L., Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2016). Predicting older adults’ perceptions about a computer system designed for seniors. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(2), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rabipour, S., & Davidson, P. S. R. (2015). Do you believe in brain training? A questionnaire about expectations of computerised cognitive training. Behavioural Brain Research, 295, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rabipour, S., Andringa, R., Boot, W. R., & Davidson, P. S. (2018). What do people expect of cognitive enhancement? Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2(1), 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In B. L. Cacioppo & L. L. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: a source book (pp. 153–176). London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly, 15(2), 175–183.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Souders, D. J., Boot, W. R., Blocker, K., Vitale, T., Roque, N. A., & Charness, N. (2017). Evidence for narrow transfer after short-term cognitive training in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sullivan. (1990). Perceived deficits questionnaire (PDQ).Google Scholar
  21. Tennstedt, S. L., & Unverzagt, F. W. (2013). The ACTIVE study: study overview and major findings. Journal of Aging and Health, 25(8 0), 3S–20S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Toril, P., Reales, J. M., & Ballesteros, S. (2014). Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 706–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler memory scale—3rd edition. The Psychological. Corporation, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin R. Harrell
    • 1
  • Brandon Kmetz
    • 1
  • Walter R. Boot
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations