Improving Older Adults’ Working Memory: the Influence of Age and Crystallized Intelligence on Training Outcomes
- 733 Downloads
To counter age-related decline in cognitive abilities, interventions such as working memory trainings have shown some promising results in old age. Yet, findings are mixed and there is enormous interindividual variability in training and transfer effects. Thus, it is still an open question which person-specific factors may moderate training and transfer effects in working memory interventions in older adults. The present study investigated this issue in the context of an established verbal working memory training. Eighty-eight participants (age range 60–82 years) performed either four sessions of the Borella et al. (Psychology and Aging 25(4):767–778, 2010) working memory training or of a visual search training as active control condition or belonged to a passive control group. Before and after the training, participants performed a test battery to assess different cognitive abilities and everyday competence. Furthermore, we included questionnaires on personality factors and intrinsic motivation as possible covariates. The training group showed a substantial training gain in the working memory criterion task that was not found in the active control group. Furthermore, only participants of the working memory training showed also near transfer to another working memory task. No far transfer effects including everyday competence emerged. In terms of possible moderators, age and crystallized intelligence influenced the training and transfer gain in the training group. In conclusion, our results showed that working memory can be improved in older adults and improvements transfer to a non-trained working memory task. However, person-specific factors have to be considered to understand who benefits from the training and why.
KeywordsCognitive training Older adults Working memory Transfer Prospective memory
MK acknowledges the support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). We thank Thomas Redick (Purdue University) for providing us the task for our active control training group.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All participants signed an informed consent prior to study participation. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Geneva.
- Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 366–377. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x.
- Borella, E., Carbone, E., Pastore, M., De Beni, R., & Carretti, B. (2017). Working memory training for healthy older adults: the role of individual characteristics in explaining short- and long-term gains. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(99). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00099.
- Brehmer, Y., Westerberg, H., & Backman, L. (2012). Working-memory training in younger and older adults: training gains, transfer, and maintenance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(63). https://doi.org/10.3389/Fnhum.2012.00063.
- Brom, S. S., Schnitzspahn, K. M., Melzer, M., Hagner, F., Bernhard, A., & Kliegel, M. (2014). Fluid mechanics moderate the effect of implementation intentions on a health prospective memory task in older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 11(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-013-0288-2.
- Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Lindenberger, U. (2010). Adult age differences in covariation of motivation and working memory performance: contrasting between-person and within-person findings. Research in Human Development, 7(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600903578177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cantarella, A., Borella, E., Carretti, B., Kliegel, M., & de Beni, R. (2017). Benefits in tasks related to everyday life competences after a working memory training in older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carretti, B., Borella, E., Zavagnin, M., & De Beni, R. (2011). Impact of metacognition and motivation on the efficacy of strategic memory training in older adults: analysis of specific, transfer and maintenance effects. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 52(3), E192–E197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.11.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deci, E. L., Egharri, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization—the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Delaloye, C., Ludwig, C., Borella, E., Chicherio, C., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2008). L’Empan de lecture comme épreuve mesurant la capacité de mémoire de travail : normes basées sur une population francophone de 775 adultes jeunes et âgés. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 58(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2006.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dinno, A. (2012). paran: Horn’s test of principal components/factors (Version R package version 1.5.1).Google Scholar
- Fox, J. G., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Heinzel, S., Schulte, S., Onken, J., Duong, Q. L., Riemer, T. G., Heinz, A., et al. (2014). Working memory training improvements and gains in non-trained cognitive tasks in young and older adults. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 21(2), 146–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2013.790338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hering, A., Wild-Wall, N., Gajewski, P. D., Falkenstein, M., Kliegel, M., & Zinke, K. (2016). The role of cue detection for prospective memory development across the lifespan. Neuropsychologia, 93(Part A), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work: a meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548725.
- Kliegel, M., Altgassen, M., Hering, A., & Rose, N. S. (2011). A process-model based approach to prospective memory impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2166–2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Neuropsychologia.2011.01.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kueider, A. M., Parisi, J. M., Gross, A. L., & Rebok, G. W. (2012). Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review. Plos One, 7(7), e40588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588.
- Lampit, A., Hallock, H., & Valenzuela, M. (2014). Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. Plos Medicine, 11(11), e1001756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756.
- Melby-Lervag, M., & Hulme, C. (2016). There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is effective: a reply to Au et al. (2014) and Karbach and Verhaeghen (2014). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 324-330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0862-z.
- Milborrow, S. (2017). Earth: multivariate adaptive regression splines (Version R package version 4.4.9.).Google Scholar
- Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1996). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and Mill Hill vocabulary scales. Standard progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., … Engle, R. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029082.
- Reitan, R. (1979). Trail-making test. Arizona: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Revelle, W. (2016). Psych: procedures for personality and psychological research (Version R package version 1.6.12).Google Scholar
- Rose, N. S., Rendell, P. G., Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Bidelman, G., & Craik, F. I. M. (2015). Cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults’ prospective memory following training with the Virtual Week computer game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(592). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00592.
- Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017). Working memory training revisited: a multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0.
- Tomaszewski Farias, S., Cahn-Weiner, D. A., Harvey, D. J., Reed, B. R., Mungas, D., Kramer, J. H., & Chui, H. (2009). Longitudinal changes in memory and executive functioning are associated with longitudinal change in instrumental activities of daily living in older adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802360558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). The construction and validation of a new measure of motivation toward education, Ecmelle-De-Motivation-En-Education (Eme). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 21(3), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vercambre, M. N., Cuvelier, H., Gayon, Y. A., Hardy-Leger, I., Berr, C., Trivalle, C., et al. (2010). Validation study of a French version of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status (F-TICS-m) in elderly women. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(11), 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/Gps.2447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2011). Échelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour adultes (WAIS-IV) - 4ème édition. Paris, France: ecpa.Google Scholar
- Willis, S. (1994). Test administration manual for everyday problems for cognitively challenged elderly. University Park Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
- Woods, S. P., Weinborn, M., Velnoweth, A., Rooney, A., & Bucks, R. S. (2012). Memory for intentions is uniquely associated with instrumental activities of daily living in healthy older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(1), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711001263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar