Advertisement

Impact of atmospheric ionization by delayed radiation from high-altitude nuclear explosions on radio communication

  • Heng Xu
  • Jian-Ming OuyangEmail author
  • Shang-Wu Wang
  • Yun Liu
  • Xu Sun
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the motion, shape, and delayed radiation intensity of a radioactive cloud by establishing a volume-source model of delayed radiation after high-altitude nuclear explosions. Then, the spatial distribution of electron number density at different moments on the north side of the explosion point generated by delayed γ-rays and delayed β-rays from the radioactive cloud under the influence of the geomagnetic field was calculated by solving chemical reaction kinetics equations. The impact of radio communication in the different frequency bands on the process of atmospheric ionization was also studied. The numerical results of the high-altitude nuclear explosion (120 km high and with a 1 megaton equivalent at 40° N latitude) indicated that the peak of electron number density ionized delayed γ-rays is located at a height of approximately 100 km and that of electron number density ionized delayed β-rays is about 90 km high. After 1 min of explosion, the radio communication in the medium frequency (MF) and high-frequency (HF) bands was completely interrupted, and the energy attenuation of the radio wave in the very high-frequency (VHF) band was extremely high. Five minutes later, the VHF radio communication was basically restored, but the energy attenuation in the HF band was still high. After 30 min, the VHF radio communication returned to normal, but its influence on the HF and MF radio communication continued.

Keywords

High-altitude nuclear explosions Delayed radiation Ionization effect Radio communication 

References

  1. 1.
    D. Qiao, The Introduction to Nuclear Explosion Physics (National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2003), pp. 393–395Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Glasstone, P.J. Dolan, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons (United States Department of Defense and the Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, 1977), pp. 387–439.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.P. Williams, The effect of high-altitude nuclear explosions on radio communication. IRE Trans. Mil. Electron. 6(4), 326–338 (1962).  https://doi.org/10.1109/IRET-MIL.1962.5008460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.M. Petersen, Optical, electromagnetic and satellite observations of high-altitude nuclear detonations, part II. J. Geophys. Res. 64, 933–950 (1959).  https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ064i008p00933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Hoerlin, United States High-Altitude Test Experiences. (Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1976), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.H. Cummack, G.A.M. King, Disturbance in the ionospheric F-region following the Johnston Island nuclear explosion. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 2(3), 634–641 (1959).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1959.10423166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Ouyang, Y. Ma, F. Shao et al., Ionization effect of atmosphere by prompt rays from high-altitude nuclear explosions. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 61, 1143–1150 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2014.2320595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Z. Sheng, Advances in High Field Laser Physics (Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai, 2014), pp. 2–15Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Matsushita, On artificial geomagnetic and ionospheric storms associated with high-altitude explosions. J. Geophys. Res. 64, 1149–1161 (1959).  https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ064i009p01149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Ouyang, Y. Ma, F. Shao, D. Zou et al., The effect of energetic electron impact ionization on radiation ionization process of high-altitude nuclear explosion. Acta Phys. Sin. 61, 212802 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.61.212802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Zhuang, N. Yuan, S. Liu et al., Plasma Stealth Technology (Science Press, Beijing, 2004), pp. 76–78Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Wang, S. Niu, D. Zhang et al., The Parameter Manual Book of High-Altitude Nuclear Explosion Effects (Atomic Energy Press, Beijing, 2010), pp. 178–190Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Qiao, The Introduction to Nuclear Explosion Physics (National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2003), pp. 399–401Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Ouyang, W. Guo, L. Wang et al., Numerical simulation of chemical processes in one-dimensonal atmospheric plasmas. Acta Phys. Sin. 9, 4975–4979 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.55.4974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.J. Vidmar, Plasma cloaking: air chemistry, broadband absorption, and plasma generation. (Remote Measurements Lab., CA, 1990), pp. 2–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Heicklen, Atmospheric Chemistry (Academic Press, Pittsburgh, 1976), pp. 40–42Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Brasseur, S. Solomon, Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere (D. Reidel, Boston, 1984), pp. 353–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Qiao, The Introduction to Nuclear Explosion Physics (National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2003), pp. 359–377Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Zeng, J. Yuan, Radiative opacity of gold plasma studied by a detailed level-accounting method. Phys. Rev. E 74, 025401 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVE.74.025401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heng Xu
    • 1
  • Jian-Ming Ouyang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shang-Wu Wang
    • 1
  • Yun Liu
    • 2
  • Xu Sun
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Liberal Arts and SciencesNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina
  2. 2.College of Physics and Micro ElectronicHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  3. 3.College of Electronics ScienceNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations