Advertisement

Development of a displacement-reactivity feedback model for dynamic behavior simulation in fast burst reactor

  • Jiang-Meng Wang
  • Hui Gao
  • Qi-Lin Xie
  • Xiao-Qiang Fan
  • Da-Zhi QianEmail author
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a displacement-reactivity feedback model, which can directly represent the inherent “thermal expansion extinction effect” of fast burst reactors (FBRs), was developed with the aid of the static neutron transport component of the FBR-MPC code. Dynamic behaviors of bursts in the Godiva I reactor were simulated by coupling the simplified multiphysics models consisting of the point kinetic equations for neutronics, adiabatic equation for temperature, and thermoelastic equations for displacement/stress with the developed model. The results were compared with the corresponding experimental data and those obtained using the traditional fission yield (temperature rise)-reactivity feedback models. It was found that the developed model can provide good results for the bursts with no or a small inertia effect. For the bursts with a prominent inertia effect, the smaller burst width and asymmetric distribution of the fission rate curve, noticed in the experiments but not evident using the traditional models, can be reproduced. In addition, the realistic oscillations in reactivity and fission rate caused by the core vibration, as well as the deeper sub-prompt criticality in the plateau following the burst, can be observed. Therefore, the developed displacement-reactivity feedback model can be expected to be an effective tool for calculating the dynamic behaviors of bursts.

Keywords

Displacement-reactivity feedback model Prompt supercritical Coupled calculation Fast burst reactor 

References

  1. 1.
    R.F. He, M.C. Deng, Experiments and Physics on Fast-Neutron Critical Facilities and Pulsed Reactors (National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2012), p. 422Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.P. Shabalin (ed.), Fast Pulsed and Burst Reactors (Pergamon Press, New York, 1979)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.J. Grove, R.H. Kimpland, W.L. Myers, A dynamic simulation tool for critical assemblies using the coupled neutronic-thermoelastic method, Paper presented at the American Nuclear Society 2008 Winter Meeting, Reno, Nov 2008, pp. 9–13Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Fiorina, M. Aufiero, S. Pelloni, et al, A time-dependent solver for coupled neutron transport thermal-mechanics calculations and simulation of a Godiva prompt-critical burst. ASME. International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Volume 4: Radiation Protection and Nuclear Technology Applications; Fuel Cycle, Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Coupled Codes; Reactor Physics and Transport Theory: V004T11A008. Prague, Czech Republic, July 7–11, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1115/icone22-30395
  5. 5.
    J. Wang, W.F. Liang, S. Chen et al., Dynamic behavior in fast burst reactor with three-dimensional coupled multiphysics method. Nucl. Eng. Des. 338, 16–22 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.F. Wimett, Time Behavior of Godiva Through Prompt Critical (Los Alamos National Laboratory Web, 1995). https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/lib-www/la-pubs. Accessed 28 July 1995
  7. 7.
    J. Li, H. Gao, M. Li et al., Analysis of shutdown physics progress of CFBR-II. Atom. Energy Sci. Technol. 47(3), 355–358 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.7538/yzk.2013.47.03.0355. (in Chinese) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.Z. Chen, L.F. Guo, B. Zhu et al., Accuracy of analytical methods for obtaining supercritical transients with temperature feedback. Prog. Nucl. Energy 49, 290–302 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.C. Wilson, S.R. Biegalski, R.L. Coats, Computational modeling of coupled thermomechanical and neutron transport behavior in a Godiva-like nuclear assembly. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 157, 344–353 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE06-28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.I. Bell, S. Glasstone, Nuclear Reactor Theory (van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1970), p. 54Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.Y. Kadioglu, D.A. Knoll, Multiphysics analysis of spherical fast burst reactors. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 163, 132–143 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.R. Stratton, Analysis of prompt excursions in the simple systems on idealized fast reactors, Paper presented at the international conference on the peaceful uses of atomic energy, Geneva, Sep 1958, pp. 1–13Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Q.Y. Li, N.C. Wang, D.Y. Yi, Numerical Analysis, 3rd edn. (Tsinghua University Express, Beijing, 2015), p. 51Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.J. LaBauve (ed.), International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, 2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Li, B.Y. Zhang, L. Deng et al., Development of Monte Carlo particle transport code JMCT. High Power Laser Part. Beams 25(01), 158–161 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3788/HPLPB20132501.158. (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiang-Meng Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hui Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qi-Lin Xie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiao-Qiang Fan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Da-Zhi Qian
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Neutron PhysicsChina Academy of Engineering PhysicsMianyangChina
  2. 2.Institute of Nuclear Physics and ChemistryChina Academy of Engineering PhysicsMianyangChina

Personalised recommendations