Advertisement

Designing a nuclear battery based on the Mo-99 radioactive source soluble in water and aqua regia in order to use in early tests

  • Zohreh MovahedianEmail author
  • Hossein Tavakoli-Anbaran
Article

Abstract

Today, millions of electrocommunication, electric, medical, and industrial devices use battery. Batteries with long life and high energy density seem to be essential in medical, military, oil and mining, aerospace areas as well as conditions in which access is difficult and in situations where replacement or recharging of battery is costly. In this regard, the use of radiation energy resulting from radioactive materials and its conversion to electric energy can be effective in making batteries. In the present study, various Mo-99 radioisotope values with a half-life of 65.98 h were used as a soluble radioactive source in two materials of water and aqua regia. Then, by comparing the results of the Monte Carlo simulations program MCNPX for these two solutions, it was found that when the water is used instead of aqua regia (for idealization), the values of the superficial current of electrons, the volumetric flux of electrons, and the deposited energy in the volume containing the radioactive solution increased by 10.80, 4.10, and 13.80%, respectively. Also, the short-circuit current and energy conversion efficiency of this battery with a concentration of 0.01 molar, Mo-99 dissolved in the aqua regia are 0.79 µA and 16.47%, respectively.

Keywords

Nuclear battery Radioactive solution MCNPX code Mo-99 

References

  1. 1.
    T. Alam, M. Pierson, M. Prelas, Beta particle transport and its impact on betavoltaic battery modeling. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 130, 80–89 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Prelas, M. Boraas, F. De La Torre Aguilar et al., Nuclear Batteries and Radioisotopes (Springer, Columbia, 2016), p. 1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Dunn-Rankin, E.M. Leal, D.C. Walther, Personal power systems. Prog. Energy Combust. 31, 422–465 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2005.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Honsberg, A. Doolittle, M. Allen, et al., GaN betavoltaic energy converters, Paper Presented at the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (Lake Buena Vista, USA 3–7 Jan. 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Schaldach, S. Furman (eds.), Advances in Pacemaker Technology (Springer, Berlin, 1975)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.E. Adams, S.T. Revankar, Research, development and evaluation capabilities for betavoltaic power sources, Paper Presented at 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Seattle, 14–17 June 2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Prelas, M. Boraas, F. De La Torre Aguilar et al., Nuclear Batteries and Radioisotopes (Springer, Columbia, 2016), p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Oh, M. Prelas, J.B. Rothenberger et al., Theoretical maximum efficiencies of optimized slab and spherical betavoltaic systems utilizing sulfur-35, strontium-90, and yttrium-90. Nucl. Technol. 179, 234–242 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.13182/NT12-A14095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Theirrattanakul, M. Prelas, A methodology for efficiency optimization of betavoltaic cell design using an isotropic planar source having an energy dependent beta particle distribution. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 127, 41–46 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Kowalsky, Technetium Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry (The University of New Mexico. Health Sciences Center, 2006), p. 7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Baba, N. Baba, H. Natsume, Half-lives of some fission product nuclides. J. Inorg. Nucl. 33, 589–595 (1971).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(71)80409-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Angeli, K.P. Marinova, Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: an update. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 1, 69–95 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2011.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.M. Wong, Introductory Nuclear Physics (Wiley, London, 1999), p. 368Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Huber, Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors. Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.024617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.H. Wilkinson, Evaluation of beta-decay part II finite mass and size effects. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 290, 509–515 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(90)90570-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.H. Wilkinson, Evaluation of beta-decay part V the Z-independent outer radiative corrections for allowed decay. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 365, 497–507 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)00495-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Shahrabia, H. Tavakoli-Anbaranb, calculating dosimetry parameters in brachiotherapy using the continuous beta spectrum of Sm-153 in the Monte Carlo simulation approach. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 1–8 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2015-15035-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Kavetsky, G. Yakubova, M. Sychov, Tritium-charged capacitor. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 159, 321–329 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE159-321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Kavetskiy, G. Yakubova, Q. Lin et al., Promethium-147 capacitor. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67, 1057–1062 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G.N. Yakubova, Dissertation (Department of Nuclear, Plasma and Radiological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Kumar, Atomic batteries: energy from radioactivity. e-print arXiv:1511.07427 (2015)

Copyright information

© China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Physics and Nuclear EngineeringShahrood University of TechnologyShahroodIran

Personalised recommendations