Determination of water equivalent ratio for some dosimetric materials in proton therapy using MNCPX simulation tool
- 12 Downloads
The water equivalent ratio (WER) was calculated for polypropylene (PP), paraffin, polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and polycarbonate materials with potential applications in dosimetry and medical physics. This was performed using the Monte Carlo simulation code, MCNPX, at different proton energies. The calculated WER values were compared with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) data, available experimental and analytical results, as well as the FLUKA, SRIM, and SEICS codes. PP and PMMA were associated with the minimum and maximum WER values, respectively. Good agreement was observed between the MCNPX and NIST data. The biggest difference was 0.71% for PS at 150 MeV proton energy. In addition, a relatively large positive correlation between the WER values and the electron density of the dosimetric materials was observed. Finally, it was noted that PE presented the most analogous Depth Dose Characteristics to liquid water.
KeywordsWater equivalent ratio Proton therapy Dosimetric materials MCNPX code
The authors thank Dr. M.A. Roshanzamir (Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Iran) for modifying and editing the manuscript.
- 3.F.M. Khan, J.P. Gibbons, Khan’s the Physics of Radiation Therapy, 5th edn. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2014)Google Scholar
- 4.S. Shirmardi, E. Saniei, M. Erfani et al., Tissue inhomogeneity in proton therapy and investigation of its effects on BRAGG peak by using MCNPX code. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 12, 335–341 (2014)Google Scholar
- 11.S. Icru, Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement, Report 44 (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1989)Google Scholar
- 12.S. Icru, Powers and Ranges for Protons and Alpha Particles, Report 49 (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1993), p. 23Google Scholar
- 18.J.F. Janni, Proton range-energy tables, 1 keV–10 GeV, energy loss, range, path length, time-of-flight, straggling, multiple scattering, and nuclear interaction probability. Part I. For 63 compounds. At. Data Nucl. Data 27, 147–339 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/9/004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.A. Konefał, P. Szaflik, W. Zipper, Influence of the energy spectrum and spatial spread of proton beams used in eye tumor treatment on the depth-dose characteristics. Nukleonika 55, 313–316 (2010)Google Scholar
- 23.D. Pellowitz, MCNPX User’s Manual, version 2.6. 0. Los Alamos Report No LA CP 2:408 (2007)Google Scholar
- 26.S. Icru, Stopping Powers for Electrons and Positrons, Report 37 (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1984)Google Scholar
- 29.G.F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, 3rd edn. (Wiley, New York, 2000)Google Scholar