Advertisement

Development of a dynamics model for graphite-moderated channel-type molten salt reactor

  • Long He
  • Cheng-Gang Yu
  • Rui-Min Ji
  • Wei GuoEmail author
  • Ye Dai
  • Xiang-Zhou CaiEmail author
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

A molten salt reactor (MSR) is one of the six advanced reactor concepts selected by the generation IV international forum because of its advantages of inherent safety, and the promising capabilities of Th-U breeding and transuranics transmutation. A dynamics model for the channel-type MSR is developed in this work based on a three-dimensional thermal–hydraulic model (3DTH) and a point reactor model. The 3DTH couples a three-dimensional heat conduction model and a one-dimensional single-phase flow model that can accurately consider the heat conduction between different assemblies. The 3DTH is validated by the RELAP5 code in terms of the temperature and mass flow distribution calculation. A point reactor model considering the drift of delayed neutron precursors is adopted in the dynamics model. To verify the dynamics model, three experiments from the molten salt reactor experiment are simulated. The agreement of the experimental data and simulation results was excellent. With the aid of this model, the unprotected step reactivity addition and unprotected loss of flow of the 2 MWt experimental MSR are modeled, and the reactor power and temperature evolution are analyzed.

Keywords

Molten salt reactor Thermal–hydraulics Point reactor model Thermal coupling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Hai-Ling Wang for providing the computation resources and technical support during the simulation.

References

  1. 1.
    R.C. Briant, C.B. Ellis, Aircraft nuclear propulsion program: quarterly progress report for period ending December 10, 1951. ORNL, ORNL-1154, USA (1951). http://moltensalt.org/references/static/downloads/pdf/ORNL-1154.pdf
  2. 2.
    E.S. Bettis, R.W. Schroeder, G.A. Cristy et al., The aircraft reactor experiment—design and construction. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2, 804–825 (1957).  https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE57-A35495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.C. Robertson, MSRE design and operations report part I: description of reactor design. ORNL, ORNL-TM-0728, USA (1965). http://moltensalt.org/references/static/downloads/pdf/ORNL-TM-0728.pdf
  4. 4.
    P.R. Kasten, E.S. Bettis, W.B. McDonald, et al., Summary of molten-salt breeder reactor design studies. ORNL, ORNL-TM-1467, USA (1966). http://moltensalt.org/references/static/downloads/pdf/ORNL-TM-1467.pdf
  5. 5.
    E. Merle-Lucotte, D. Heuer, C. Le Brun, et al., The TMSR as actinide burner and thorium breeder. Lucotte (2007). http://hal.in2p3.fr/in2p3-00143680/document
  6. 6.
    D. Heuer, E. Merle-Lucotte, M. Allibert et al., Simulation tools and new developments of the molten salt fast reactor. RGN Revue Générale Nucléaire 6, 95–100 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1051/rgn/20106095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Furukawa, K. Arakawa, L.B. Erbay et al., A road map for the realization of global-scale thorium breeding fuel cycle by single molten-fluoride flow. Energy Convers. Manag. 49, 1832–1848 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Ignatiev, O. Feynberg, I. Gnidoi, et al., Progress in development of Li, Be, Na/F molten salt actinide recycler and transmuter concept, in Proceedings of ICAPP 2007 (Nice, 2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.H. Jiang, H.J. Xu, Z.M. Dai, Advanced fission energy program-TMSR nuclear energy system. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 27, 366–374 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2012.03.016. (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Křepel, U. Rohde, U. Grundmann et al., DYN3D-MSR spatial dynamics code for molten salt reactors. Ann. Nucl. Energy 34, 449–462 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2006.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Kópházi, D. Lathouwers, J.L. Kloosterman, Development of a three-dimensional time-dependent calculation scheme for molten salt reactors and validation of the measurement data of the molten salt reactor experiment. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 163, 118–131 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE163-118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.Y. Si, Q.C. Chen, H. Bei et al., Modeling and simulation of redesigned thorium molten salt reactor. High Power Laser Part. Beams. 29, 71–78 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.11884/hplpb201729.160260. (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Q. Wei, W. Guo, H.L. Wang et al., Develop and verify coupling program of the neutron physics and thermal hydraulic for MSR. Nucl. Tech. 40, 100605 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2017.hjs.40.100605. (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. He, C.G. Yu, W. Guo et al., Development of a coupled code for steady-state analysis of the graphite-moderated channel type molten salt reactor. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2018, 4053254 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4053254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.W. Cooke, B. Cox, Forced-convection heat-transfer measurements with a molten fluoride mixture flowing in a smooth tube, ORNL, ORNL-TM-4079, USA (1973). http://moltensalt.org/references/static/downloads/pdf/ORNL-TM-4079.pdf
  16. 16.
    L. Li, Z.J. Zhang, Research on transient flux distribution in parallel channels. Nucl. Power Eng. 31, 97–101 (2010). (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    COMSOL Multiphysics, Introduction to COMSOL multiphysics. COMSOL Multiphysics (2016). https://cdn.comsol.com/documentation/5.3.0.316/IntroductionToCOMSOLMultiphysics.pdf
  18. 18.
    C.M. Allison, R.J. Wagner, J.K. Hohorst, M.P. Ferragut, et al., The development of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD4.0 for advanced fluid systems design analysis, in The 11th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Operation and Safety Gyeongju, Korea, Oct. 9–13, 2016Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B.E. Prince, S.J. Ball, J.R. Engel, et al., Zero-power physics experiments on the molten-salt reactor experiment. ORNL, ORNL-4233, USA (1968) http://moltensalt.org/references/static/downloads/pdf/ORNL-4233.pdf
  20. 20.
    M.W. Rosenthal, R.B. Briggs, P.R. Kasten, Molten salt reactor program semiannual progress report. ORNL, ORNL-4396, USA (1969) http://moltensalt.org/references/static/downloads/pdf/ORNL-4396.pdf
  21. 21.
    M. Delpech, S. Dulla, C. Garzenne, J. Kophazi, J. Krepel, et al., Benchmark of dynamic simulation tools for molten salt reactors. GLOBAL 2003. Nuclear Science and Technology: Meeting the Global Industrial and R&D Challenges of the 21st Century, Nov 2003, New Orleans, United States. American Nuclear Society, pp. 2182–2187 (2003). http://hal.in2p3.fr/in2p3-00020303
  22. 22.
    S.J. Ball, T.W. Kerlin, Stability analysis of the molten-salt reactor experiment. ORNL, ORNL-TM-1070, USA (1965). http://moltensalt.org/references/static/downloads/pdf/ORNL-TM-1070.pdf
  23. 23.
    J. Krepel, Dynamics of molten salt reactors. Ph.D. Thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D.T. Ingersoll, C.W. Forsberg, L.J. Ott, et al., Status of preconceptual design of the advanced high-temperature reactor (AHTR). ORNL, ORNL-TM-2004-104, USA (2004).  https://doi.org/10.2172/861752
  25. 25.
    ORNL. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluations. ORNL, ORNL-TM-2005, USA (2005). http://www.wipp.energy.gov/library/CRA/CRA-2014/References/Others/ORNL_2009_SCALE_Version6.pdf
  26. 26.
    G. Mckinney. MCNP6 User’s manual—version 1.0. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Report number: LA-CP-13-00634 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Institute of Applied PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina
  2. 2.CAS Innovative Academy in TMSR Energy SystemChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations