Advertisement

The influence of wheat banker plant cultivars on the reproductive potential of Aphidius gifuensis

  • Hui Zhong Sun
  • Yue Qin SongEmail author
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The life history traits of Aphidius gifuensis on Schizaphis graminum reared on six cultivars of wheat (var. Annong, Jimai, Shannong, Shimai, Yangmai and Liangxing) were investigated in the laboratory. Results show that the developmental stage of A. gifuensis from the Annong treatment was significantly less than that of other wheat cultivars. Although the longevity of A. gifuensis females of the Shimai, Yangmai and Liangxing treatments was significantly longer than that of other treatments, even only the numbers of A. gifuensis female adults were greater in Shimai and Yangmai treatments. With Annong as the host plant, the intrinsic rate of increase (r) of A. gifuensis parasitizing S. graminum was significantly greater than that of other wheat species. In conclusion, among the six selected wheat cultivars, A. gifuensis performed best in the Annong treatments; thus, the wheat cultivar Annong might be the best host plant for mass rearing of A. gifuensis in biological control programs.

Keywords

Schizaphis graminum Banker plant Biological control Parasitoid Two-sex life table 

Notes

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China (182300410024) and the National Natural Science Fund of China (31701788).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This research has no involving human and animal rights. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.

References

  1. Aduba OL, Olson DM, Ruberson JR, Hartel PG, Potter TL (2013) Flowering plant effects on adults of the stink bug parasitoid Aridelus rufotestaceus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biol Control 67:344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnó J, Ariño J, Español R, Marti M, Alomar Ò (2000) Conservation of Macrolophus caliginosus Wagner (Het. Miridae) in commerical greenhouses during tomato crop-fee periods. IOBC/WPRS Bull 23:241–246Google Scholar
  3. Caron V, Myers J, Gillespie D (2008) Fitness-related traits in a parasitoid fly are mediated by effects of plants on its host. J Appl Entomol 132:663–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chi H (1988) Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ Entomol 17:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chi H (2017) TWOSEX-MS Chart: computer program for age stage, two-sex life table analysis. http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/Download/TWOSEX-MSChart.rar
  6. Chi H, Liu H (1985) Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull Insti Zool Acad Sin 24:225–240Google Scholar
  7. Chi H, Su HY (2006) Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ Entomol 35:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis JA, Radcliffe EB (2008) Reproduction and feeding behavior of Myzus persicae on four cereals. J Econ Entomol 101:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deas J, Hunter M (2014) Egg and time limitation mediate an egg protection strategy. J Evol Biol 27:920–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleury F, Boulétreau M (1993) Effects of temporary host deprivation on the reproductive potential of Trichogramma brassicae. Entomol Exp Appl 68:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster SP, Kift NB, Baverstock J, Sime S, Reynolds K, Jones JE, Thompson R, Tatchell GM (2003) Association of MACE-based insecticide resistance in Myzus persicae with reproductive rate, response to alarm pheromone and vulnerability to attack by Aphidius colemani. Pest Manag Sci 59:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank SD (2010) Biological control of arthropod pests using banker plant systems: past progress and future directions. Biol Control 52:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freuler J, Fischer S, Mittaz C, Terrettaz C (2003) The role of banker plants in the enhancement of the action of Diaeretiella rapae (M’Intosh) (Hymenoptera, Aphidiinae) the primary parasitoid of the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae (L.). IOBC/WPRS Bull 26:277–299Google Scholar
  16. Goh HG, Kim JH, Han MW (2001) Application of Aphidius colemani Viereck for control of the aphid in greenhouse. J Asia-Pac Entomol 4:171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman D (1982) Optimal life histories, optimal notation, and the value of reproductive value. Am Nat 119:803–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gurr G, Wratten S, Barbosa P (2000) Success in conservation biological control of arthropods. In: Gurr G, Wratten S (eds) Biological control: measures of success. Springer, New York, pp 105–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang YB, Chi H (2012) Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) with a discussion on the problem of applying female age-specific life tables to insect populations. Insect Sci 19:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang N, Enkegaard A, Osborne LS, Ramakers PMJ, Messelink GJ, Pijnakker J, Murphy G (2011) The banker plant method in biological control. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobson R, Croft P (1998) Strategies for the control of Aphis gossypii Glover (Hom.: Aphididae) with Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hym.: Braconidae) in protected cucumbers. Biocontrol Sci Technol 8:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim YH, Kim JH (2004) Biological control of Aphis gossypii using barley banker plants in greenhouse grown oriental melon. In: California Conference on Biological Control IV, 13–15 July, Berkeley, California, USA. Center for Biological Control, College of Natural Resources, University of California, pp 124–126Google Scholar
  23. Lampert EC, Bowers MD (2010) Host plant species affects the quality of the generalist Trichoplusia ni as a host for the polyembryonic parasitoid Copidosoma floridanum. Entomol Exp Appl 134:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nafziger TD, Fadamiro HY (2011) Suitability of some farmscaping plants as nectar sources for the parasitoid wasp, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): effects on longevity and body nutrients. Biol Control 56:225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ohta I, Ohtaishi M (2004) Fertility, longevity and intrinsic rate of increase of Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Appl Entomol Zool 39:113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohta I, Miura K, Kobayashi M (2001) Life history parameters during immature stage of Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Appl Entomol Zool 36:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pan MZ, Liu TX (2014) Suitability of three aphid species for Aphidius gifuensis, (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Parasitoid performance varies with hosts of origin. Biol Control 69:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pan MZ, Wang L, Zhang CY, Zhang LX, Liu TX (2017) The influence of feeding and host deprivation on egg load and reproduction of an aphid parasitoid, Aphidius gifuensis, (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Appl Entomol Zool 52:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pratt P, Croft B (2000) Banker plants: evaluation of release strategies for predatory mites. J Environ Hortic 18:211–217Google Scholar
  30. Rubiomeléndez ME, Sepúlveda DA, Ramírez CC (2018) Temporal and spatial distribution of insecticide resistant mutations in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on primary and secondary host-plants in central Chile. Pest Manag Sci 74:340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarfraz M, Dosdall L, Keddie B (2009) Host plant nutritional quality affects the performance of the parasitoid Diadegma insulare. Biol Control 51:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schoen L, Albajes R, Sekeroglu E (2000) The use of open rearing units or “banker plants” against Aphis gossypii Glover in protected courgette and melon crops in Roussillon (South of France). IOBC/WPRS Bull 23:181–186Google Scholar
  33. Sivinski J (2014) The attraction of Lepidoptera to flowering plants also attractive to parasitoids (Diptera: Hymenoptera). Fla Entomol 97:1317–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stoepler TM, Lill JT, Murphy SM (2011) Cascading effects of host size and host plant species on parasitoid resource allocation. Ecol Entomol 36:724–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun HZ, Wang XD, Chen YG, Wang HT, Li SJ, Song YQ (2017) Wheat and barley as banker plant in the mass production of Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitizing Schizaphis graminum Rondani (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Plant Dis Protect 124:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teder T, Tammaru T (2002) Cascading effects of variation in plant vigour on the relative performance of insect herbivores and their parasitoids. Ecol Entomol 27:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tuan SJ, Chung-Chieh Lee CC, Chi H (2014) Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two-sex life table. Pest Manag Sci 70:805–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Driesche R, Lyon S, Sanderson J, Bennett K, Stanek E, Zhang R (2008) Greenhouse trials of Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) banker plants for control of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in greenhouse spring floral crops. Fla Entomol 91:583–591Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of AgricultureHenan University of Science and TechnologyLuoyangChina

Personalised recommendations