Advertisement

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 126, Issue 5, pp 393–399 | Cite as

Rubus stunt: a review of an important phytoplasma disease in Rubus spp.

  • Holger LinckEmail author
  • Annette Reineke
Review
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Phytoplasmas are cell wall-less plant pathogenic bacteria that colonize the phloem of their host plants and can be transferred by plant sap-sucking hemipteran insects or by vegetative propagation. In Rubus species such as red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) and blackberry (Rubus subgenus Rubus), phytoplasmas cause a disease which is referred to as Rubus stunt. Disease symptoms of Rubus stunt include stunting, witches’ broom, small leaves, short internodes, enlarged sepals, phyllody, flower proliferation, and fruit malformations. Rubus stunt is widely spread geographically and has been reported to be present throughout Europe, the former Soviet Union, the USA, Pakistan, and Turkey. As the incubation period of Rubus stunt can be up to 1 year and Rubus plants are usually produced by vegetative propagation, there is a high risk of spreading this disease in planting material. In addition, Rubus stunt is commonly overlooked because disease symptoms are often inconspicuous. Therefore, Rubus stunt has a high economic importance in these high-input crops with large initial investments. Here, we review the current state of knowledge on the causative agents of Rubus stunt, their spread, and control measures.

Keywords

Candidatus Phytoplasma rubi Macropsis fuscula Raspberry Blackberry 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arnaud G, Malembic-Maher S, Salar P, Bonnet P, Maixner M, Marcone C, Boudon-Padieu E, Foissac X (2007) Multilocus sequence typing confirms the close genetic interrelatedness of three distinct flavescence dorée phytoplasma strain clusters and group 16SrV phytoplasmas infecting grapevine and alder in Europe. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4001–4010.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02323-06 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baric S, Kerschbamer C, Vigl J, Dalla Via J (2008) Translocation of apple proliferation phytoplasma via natural root grafts—a case study. Eur J Plant Pathol 121:207–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9256-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borroto Fernández EG, Calari A, Hanzer V, Katinger H, Bertaccini A, Laimer M (2007) Phytoplasma infected plants in Austrian forests: role as a reservoir? Bull Insectol 60:391–392Google Scholar
  4. Brčák J (1979) Leafhopper and planthopper vectors of plant disease agents in central and southern Europe. In: Maramorosch K, Harris K (eds) Leafhopper vectors and plant disease agents. Academic Press, New York, pp 97–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bushway L (2008) Introduction. In: Bushway L, Pritts M, Handley D (eds) Raspberry and blackberry production guide for the northeast, midwest, and eastern Canada. NRAES (Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service), Ithaca, New York, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  6. Christensen NM, Nicolaisen M, Hansen M, Schulz A (2004) Distribution of phytoplasmas in infected plants as revealed by real-time PCR and bioimaging. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:1175–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.11.1175 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen NM, Axelsen KB, Nicolaisen M, Schulz A (2005) Phytoplasmas and their interactions with hosts. Trends Plant Sci 10:526–535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.09.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cieslinska M (2011) Detection and characterization of phytoplasmas associated with diseases of Rubus spp. in Poland. J Plant Pathol 93:51–56Google Scholar
  9. Converse RH (1991) Rubus stunt. In: Ellis M, Converse RH, Williams RN, Williamson B (eds) Compendium of raspberry and blackberry diseases and insects. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 46–47Google Scholar
  10. Davies DL (2000) The occurrence of two phytoplasmas associated with stunted Rubus species in the UK. Plant Pathol 49:86–88.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000.00418.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis RE, Dally EL (2001) Revised subgroup classification of group 16SrV phytoplasmas and placement of flavescence dorée-associated phytoplasmas in two distinct subgroups. Plant Dis 85:790–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis RE, Dally EL, Converse RH (2001) Molecular identification of a phytoplasma associated with witches’-broom disease of black raspberry in Oregon and its classification in group 16SrIII, new subgroup Q. Plant Dis 85:1121.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.10.1121A CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. de Fluiter HJ, van der Meer FA (1958) The biology and control of Macropsis fuscula Zett., the vector of the Rubus stunt virus. In: Proceedings of the tenth international congress of entomology 1956, pp 341–346Google Scholar
  14. de Vries H (1896) Een epidemic van vergroeningen [An epidemic of virescences]. Bot Jaarb 8:66–91Google Scholar
  15. Dickinson M, Tuffen M, Hodgetts J (2013) The phytoplasmas: an introduction. In: Dickinson M, Hodgetts J (eds) Phytoplasma: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doi Y, Teranaka M, Yora K, Asuyama H (1967) Mycoplasma- or PLT group-like microorganisms found in the phloem elements of plants infected with mulberry dwarf, potato witches’ broom, aster yellows, or paulownia witches’ broom. Jpn J Phytopathol 33:259–266.  https://doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.33.259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ermacora P, Osler R (2019) Symptoms of phytoplasma diseases. In: Musetti R, Pagliari L (eds) Phytoplasmas: methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, New York, pp 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahmeed F, Rosete YA, Pérez KA, Boa E, Lucas J (2009) First report of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ (group 16SrI) infecting fruits and vegetables in Islamabad, Pakistan. J Phytopathol 157:639–641.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2009.01549.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAOSTAT (2017) Food and agriculture organization corporate statistical database. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 15 Sept 2017
  20. Fiore N, Bertaccini A, Bianco PA, Cieślińska M, Ferretti L, Hoat TX, Quaglino F (2018) Fruit crop phytoplasmas. In: Rao GP, Bertaccini A, Fiore N, Liefting L (eds) Phytoplasmas: plant pathogenic bacteria—I. Springer, Singapore, pp 153–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fránová J, de Sousa E, Koloniuk I, Mimoso C, Matos J, Cardoso F, Contaldo N, Paltrinieri S, Bertaccini A (2016) Multigene characterization of a new ‘Candidatus phytoplasma rubi’-related strain associated with blackberry witches’ broom. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1438–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000871 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Galetto L, Bosco D, Marzachi C (2005) Universal and group-specific real-time PCR diagnosis of flavescence dorée (16Sr-V), bois noir (16Sr-XII) and apple proliferation (16Sr-X) phytoplasmas from field-collected plant hosts and insect vectors. Ann Appl Biol 147:191–201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.00030.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodgetts J, Boonham N, Mumford R, Dickinson M (2009) Panel of 23S rRNA gene-based real-time PCR assays for improved universal and group-specific detection of phytoplasmas. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2945–2950.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02610-08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hogenhout SA, Oshima K, Ammar ED, Kakizawa S, Kingdom HN, Namba S (2008) Phytoplasmas: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects. Mol Plant Pathol 9:403–423.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00472.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoshi A, Ishii Y, Kakizawa S, Oshima K, Namba S (2007) Host-parasite interaction of phytoplasmas from a molecular biological perspective. Bull Insectol 60:105–107Google Scholar
  26. Howard LR, Hager TJ (2007) Berry fruit phytochemicals. In: Zhao Y (ed) Berry fruit: value-added products for health promotion. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 74–146Google Scholar
  27. Hren M, Boben J, Rotter A, Kralj P, Gruden K, Ravnikar M (2007) Real-time PCR detection systems for Flavescence dorée and Bois noir phytoplasmas in grapevine: comparison with conventional PCR detection and application in diagnostics. Plant Pathol 56:785–796.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01688.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hummer KE, Brennan R, Jennings SN, Williamson B, Hall HK (2009) Raspberry breeding and genetics. Wiley-Blackwell, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarausch W, Jarausch-Wehrheim B, Danet JL, Broquaire JM, Dosba F, Saillard C, Garnier M (2001) Detection and indentification of European stone fruit yellows and other phytoplasmas in wild plants in the surroundings of apricot chlorotic leaf roll-affected orchards in southern France. Eur J Plant Pathol 107:209–217.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011234921833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenser G, Hegab A, Kollányi L (1981) Vectors of rubus stunt in Hungary. In: Proceedings of the ninth conference of the czechoslovak plant virologists, pp 73–75Google Scholar
  31. Kison H, Seemüller E (2001) Differences in strain virulence of the european stone fruit yellows phytoplasma and susceptibility of stone fruit trees on various rootstocks to this pathogen. J Phytopathol 149:533–541.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2001.00671.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee I-M, Hammond RW, Davis RE, Gundersen DE (1993) Universal amplification and analysis of pathogen 16S rDNA for classification and identification of mycoplasmalike organisms. Phytopathology 83:834–842.  https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-83-834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee I-M, Gundersen-Rindal DE, Davis RE, Bartoszyk IM (1998) Revised classification scheme of phytoplasmas based on RFLP analyses of 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:1153–1169.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-48-4-1153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lehmann W (1973) Euscelis plebejus (Fallén) und Macrosteles cristatus Ribaut als überträger von Pflanzenkrankheiten von vermuteter Mykoplasma-Ätiologie. Arch für Pflanzenschutz 9:363–370.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03235407309431236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Linck H, Reineke A (2019) Preliminary survey on putative insect vectors for Rubus stunt phytoplasmas. J Appl Entomol 00:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Linck H, Krüger E, Reineke A (2017) A multiplex TaqMan qPCR assay for sensitive and rapid detection of phytoplasmas infecting Rubus species. PLoS One 12:e0177808.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177808 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Linck H, Lankes C, Krüger E, Reineke A (2019) Elimination of phytoplasmas in Rubus mother plants by tissue culture coupled with heat therapy. Plant Dis 00:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-18-1372-RE CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorenz K-H, Schneider B, Ahrens U, Seemüller E (1995) Detection of the apple proliferation and pear decline phytoplasmas by PCR amplification of ribosomal and nonribosomal DNA. Phytopathology 85:771–776.  https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-85-771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malembic-Maher S, Salar P, Filippin L, Carle P, Angelini E, Foissac X (2011) Genetic diversity of European phytoplasmas of the 16SrV taxonomic group and proposal of “Candidatus Phytoplasma rubi”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:2129–2134.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.025411-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Marani F, Pisi A, Bertaccini A (1977) The association of mycoplasma-like bodies with Rubus stunt disease. Phytopathol Mediterr 16:150–153Google Scholar
  41. Marcone C, Ragozzino A, Seemüller E (1997) Identification and characterization of the phytoplasma associated with elm yellows in southern Italy and its relatedness to other phytoplasmas of the elm yellows group. Eur J For Pathol 27:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mäurer R, Seemüller E (1994) Nature and genetic relatedness of the mycoplasma-like organism causing Rubus stunt in Europe. Plant Pathol 44:244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murant AF, Roberts IM (1971) Mycoplasma-like bodies associated with Rubus stunt disease. Ann Appl Biol 67:389–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nyerges K, Kölber M, Elekes M, Kollányi L, Gordon SC, Jones AT (2001) Viruses, virus-like diseases and virus vectors in berryfruit crops in Hungary. Acta Hortic 551:65–70.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.551.10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prentice IW (1951) Rubus stunt: a virus disease. J Hortic Sci 26:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramkat R, Ruinelli M, Maghuly F, Schoder L, Laimer M (2014) Identification of phytoplasmas associated with Rubus spp. as prerequisite for their successful elimination. In: Bertaccini A (ed) Phytoplasmas and phytoplasma disease management: how to reduce their economic impact. COST, Bologna, pp 159–166Google Scholar
  47. Reeder R, Kelly PL, Arocha Y (2010) ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ identified in blackberry (Rubus fruticosus agg.) in the United Kingdom. Plant Pathol 59:394.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02195.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seemuller E, Schneider B (2004) “Candidatus Phytoplasma mali”, “Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri” and “Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum”, the causal agents of apple proliferation, pear decline and European stone fruit yellows, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1217–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02823-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sertkaya G, Osler R, Musetti R, Ermacora P, Martini M (2001) Detection of phytoplasmas in Rubus spp. by microscopy and molecular techniques in Turkey. Acta Hortic 656:181–186Google Scholar
  50. Smart CD, Schneider B, Blomquist CL, Guerra LJ, Harrison NA, Ahrens U, Lorenz KH, Seemüller E, Kirkpatrick BC (1996) Phytoplasma-specific PCR primers based on sequences of the 16S-23S rRNA spacer region. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2988–2993PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Stace C (2010) New flora of the british isles, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Strik BC, Finn CE, Clark JR, Bañados MP (2008) Worldwide production of blackberries. Acta Hortic 777:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tishechkin DY (2002) Review of the species of the genus Macropsis Lewis, 1834 (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) from European Russia and adjacent territories. Russ Entomol J 11:123–184Google Scholar
  54. Valiūnas D, Jomantienė R, Davis RE (2007) Phytoplasmas detected in cultivated fruit plants in Lithuania. Bull Insectol 60:139–140Google Scholar
  55. van der Meer FA (1987) Rubus stunt. In: Converse RH (ed) Virus diseases of small fruits—agriculture handbook no 631. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, pp 197–203Google Scholar
  56. van der Meer FA, de Fluiter H (1970) Rubus stunt. In: Frazier N (ed) Virus diseases of small fruits and grapevines. University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences, Berkeley, pp 128–132Google Scholar
  57. Vindimian ME, Grassi A, Ciccotti A, Poggi Pollini C, Terlizzi F (2004) Epidemiological studies on Rubus stunt (RS) in blackberry orchards located near Trento (Italy). Acta Hortic 656:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wagner W (1964) Die auf Rosaceen lebenden Macropsis-Arten der Niederlande. Entomol Ber 24:123–136Google Scholar
  59. Weintraub PG, Beanland L (2006) Insect vectors of phytoplasmas. Annu Rev Entomol 51:91–111.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Crop ProtectionHochschule Geisenheim UniversityGeisenheimGermany

Personalised recommendations