Volatiles of several grapevine cultivars emitted at different phenological stages linked to discriminatory ability of grapevine moths
The tortricid moths Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermueller) and Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner) are major insect pests of grapevine Vitis vinifera. We compared the pattern of volatile organic compounds in headspace samples of four different grapevine cultivars in dependency of their phenological stage by thermodesorption coupled with gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry. Further, we assessed the detection of compounds by the antenna of both moth species by GC coupled with electroantennographical detection. We detected significant differences between the chemical compositions of headspace samples of the four cultivars based on the odor bouquet. By comparing the principal component linear discriminant analysis pattern of only those chemical compounds that could be actually detected by the moths’ antenna, the different cultivars showed similar odor patterns indicating that differences measured by GC may not be detected by the moths’ antenna. The supposed reduced discriminatory ability of both moth species was supported by behavioral bioassays using a Y-tube olfactometer. In connection to the recently published impact of the berries’ visual appearance (shape and color) and nonvolatile compounds of the wax layer, the presented results suggest that reported moth preferences for specific cultivars are not encoded by volatiles only. The results of this study will contribute to the development of an innovative egg-monitoring tool for grapevine moths.
KeywordsLobesia botrana Eupoecilia ambiguella Vitis vinifera Olfactometer bioassay GC–MS Pattern analysis
We are grateful to the vine-growers Sven and Walter Stein (Hirschberg, Germany) participating in the project for allowing us to carry out experiments in their vineyard. We are grateful to Sandra Biancu (JKI Siebeldingen, Germany), Sebastian Faus, Sandra Schubach and Kai Lukat (JKI, Dossenheim, Germany) for insect rearing and technical assistance, to Omer Nevo (University of Ulm, Germany) for introduction in AMDIS and to Jannicke Gallinger (JKI Dossenheim) for statistical advices.
MR and AM were supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the innovation support program number 2814701611.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anfora G, Tasin M, Bäckman AC, Leonardelli E, De Cristofaro A, Lucchi A, Ioriatti C (2008) Olfactory responses of Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera tortricidae) females to volatiles from grapevine. IOBC/wprs Bull 36:233–236Google Scholar
- Birgücü AK, Turanlı F, Gümüş E, Güzel B, Karsavuran Y (2015) The effect of grape cultivars on oviposition preference and larval survival of Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Fresen Environ Bull 24:33–38Google Scholar
- Gross J, Gallinger J, Rid M (2019) Collection, identification and statistical analysis of volatile organic compound patterns emitted by phytoplasma infected plants. In: Musetti R, Pagliari L (eds) Phytoplasmas: methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology, vol 1875. Springer, New York, pp 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8837-2_25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knolhoff LM, Heckel DG (2014) Behavioral assays for studies of host plant choice and adaptation in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 59:263–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161945 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorenz DH, Eichhorn KW, Blei-Holder H, Klose R, Meier U, Weber E (1994) Phänologische Entwicklungsstadien der Weinrebe (Vitis vinifera L. ssp.). Vitic Enol Sci 49:66–70Google Scholar
- Maher N, Jolivet M, Thiéry D (2001) Oviposition preference of the European grape vine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) for different vine cultivars: influence of chemical stimuli from the fruit surface. IOBC/wprs Bull 24:103–108Google Scholar
- Masante-Roca I, Anton S, Delbac L, Dufour MC, Gadenne C (2006) Attraction of the grapevine moth to host and non-host plant parts in the wind tunnel: effects of plant phenology, sex, and mating status. Entomol Exp Appl 122:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00510.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pers JN (1981) Comparison of electroantennogram response spectra to plant volatiles in seven species of Yponomeuta and in the tortricid Adoxophyes orana. Entomol Exp Appl 30:181–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1981.tb03094.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renwick J, Chew F (1994) Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.002113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 14 Aug 2017
- Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stein SE (2010) NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry. Accessed 12 July 2017
- Stellwaag F (1928) Lepidoptera, Schmetterlinge: Tortricidae. Die Weinbauinsekten der Kulturländer: Lehr-und Handbuch. Paul Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Tasin M et al (2008) Volatiles from grape drive the oviposition of Lobesia botrana at short distance. IOBC/wprs Bull 36:351–353Google Scholar
- Zahavi T, Harari A, Thiéry D (2003) Can we expect Lobesia botrana to distribute its eggs partly using differential exposure of bunches to light? IOBC/wprs Bull 26:151–154Google Scholar