Advertisement

Control of physical background on distribution of wetlands in Diara Region, Eastern India

  • Kaustuv MukherjeeEmail author
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The sustainability of a land–water transitional zone characterised with aquatic vegetation, agriculture, waterlogging and seasonality is almost entirely dependent on physical background of the region and human activities upon it. The places where wetlands exist are now getting transformed due to a host of factors which lead to the loss of such biologically diverse ecosystem. The investigation towards the existence of wetlands in respect of its physical background can guide to identify the suitable condition of wetland concentration in one hand and reasons for wetland loss on the other. Diara is one of the most naturally dynamic regions of India due to the presence of three shifting rivers in its three sides and River Ganga is one of them. River Ganga being the major river affects both the physical set up and wetland status of this region, as within a time span of 90 years (1926–2016), it produces a migration corridor of 855.55 km2 along this region and such dynamicity has created 25 riverine wetlands with an average area of 1.41 km2. Apart from channel migration, lithological condition, relief, ground water table and soil are playing vital role in the varying distribution of wetlands in this region.

Keywords

Diara Wetlands NDWI Spatial Association Channel migration 

References

  1. 1.
    Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Goletm, F. C., & LaRoe E. T. (1979). Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report FWS/OBS-79/31, Virginia (p. 131).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zoltai, S. C. (1988). Wetland environments and classification. In Wetlands of Canada, National Wetlands Working Group and Canada Committee on Ecological Land Classification, Ottawa: Canadian Government Publications and Polyscience Publications Inc, (pp. 3–26).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Finlayson, C. M., & van der Valk, A. G. (1995). Wetland classification and inventory: A summary. Vegetation, 118, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramsar. (2011). The Ramsar manual, Ramsar and its Mission, Brief History. http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-march11/main/ramsar/1%5E25044_4000_0__. Accessed 31 March 2015.
  5. 5.
    MedWet. (2016). The Ramsar convention. http://medwet.org/aboutwetlands/ramsarconvention/. Accessed 10 January 2017.
  6. 6.
    Otieno, J. P., & Siakilo, E. W. (2015). Delineating wetlands using remote sensing and geographic information systems in Nyando River area, Kenya. International Journal of Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS, 4(1), 21–36.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Hara, C. G. (2016). Remote sensing and geospatial application for wetland mapping, assessment, and mitigation. Online Article, http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXIV/part1/paper/00079.pdf. Accessed 14 December 2016.
  8. 8.
    Klemas, V., & Pieterse, A. (2015). Using remote sensing to map and monitor water resources in arid and semiarid regions. In T. Younos & T. E. Parece (Eds.), Advances in watershed science and assessment, the handbook of environmental chemistry (pp. 33–60). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14212-8_2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ozesmi, S. L., & Bauer, M. E. (2002). Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manju, G., Chowdary, V. M., Srivastava, Y. K., Selvamani, S., Jeyaram, A., & Adiga, S. (2005). Mapping and characterization of inland wetlands using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sugumaran, R. (2004). Using remote sensing data to study wetland dynamics in Iowa. Iowa Space Grant (Seed) Final Technical Report, http://www.ecognition.com/sites/default/files/317_sugu_iowawetland.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2015.
  12. 12.
    Guofu, L., & Shengyan, D. (2004). Impacts of human activity and natural change on the wetland landscape pattern along the Yellow River in Henan Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 14(3), 339–348.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02837415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crecious, H., & Lazarus, C. (2013). Human perceptions on degradation of wetland ecosystems: The case of Magwenzi Wetland in Chivi District; Zimbabwe. Greener Journal of Geology and Earth Sciences, 1(1), 013–022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bassi, N., Kumar, M. D., Sharma, A., & Pardha-Saradhi, P. (2014). Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen, M. J., Creed, I. F., Alexander, L., et al. (2016). Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 113(8), 1978–1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brinson, M. M. (1993). A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands, Technical Report WRP–DE–4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/wetlands/pdfs/wrpde4.pdf.
  17. 17.
    Brinson, M. M., Lee, L. C., Rheinhardt, R. D., Hollands, G. G., Whigham, D. F., & Nuttler, W. D. (1997). A summary of common questions, misconceptions, and some answers concerning the hydrogeomorphic approach to functional assessment of wetland ecosystems: scientific and technical issues. Bulletin of the Society of Wetland Scientists, 17(2), 16–21.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    USDA. (2008). Hydrogeomorphic wetland classification system: An overview and modification to better meet the needs of the natural resources conservation service. Technical Note No. 190876 of Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA. February 2008. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_010784.pdf. Accessed 12 Feburary 2018.
  19. 19.
    Lambourn, G. E. (1918). Bengal District Gazetteers: Malda. Calcutta: The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Census of India. (2011). District census handbook: Maldah. Village and Town Wise Primary Census Abstract (PCA). Directorate of Census Operations, West Bengal, Retrieved from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/1906_PART_B_DCHB_MALDAH.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2016.
  21. 21.
    Mukherjee, K., & Pal, S. (2017). Channel migration zone mapping of the River Ganga in the Diara surrounding region of Eastern India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(5), 2181–2203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9984-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mcfeeters, S. K. (1996). The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1425–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gao, B. C. (1996). NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zorrilla-Miras, P., Palomoa, I., Gómez-Baggethunc, E., Martín-López, B., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2014). Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: A case study in the Donana marshes (SW Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning, 122(2014), 160–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alam, M., Alam, M. M., Curray, J. R., Chowdhury, M. L. R., & Gani, M. R. (2003). An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history. Sedimentary Geology, 155(2003), 179–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(02)00180-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roy, A. B., & Chatterjee, A. (2015). Tectonic framework and evolutionary history of the Bengal Basin in the Indian subcontinent. Current Science, 109(2), 271–279.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tandon, S. K., Chakraborty, P. P., & Singh, V. (2014). Geological and tectonic framework of India: Providing context to geomorphologic development. In V. Kale (Ed.), Landscapes and landforms of India. World Geomorphological Landscapes (pp. 3–14). Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8029-2_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lambs, L. (2000). Correlation of conductivity and stable isotope 18O for the assessment of water origin in river system. Chemical Geology, 164(2000), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lambs, L., Loudes, J. P., & Berthelot, M. (2002). The use of the stable oxygen isotope (O18) to follow the water distribution and absorption in riparian woodlands. Nukleotika, 47, S71–S74.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brown, R. B. (2007). Soil texture. Agronomy Fact Sheet Series: Fact Sheet SL29, Cornell University, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Retrieved from http://water.rutgers.edu/Rain_Gardens/factsheet29.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2018.
  31. 31.
    Finch, H. J. S., Samuel, A. M., & Lane, G. P. F. (2014). Soils and soil management. In S. Finch, A. M. Samuel, & G. P. Lane (Eds.), Lockhart & Wiseman’s crop husbandry including grassland (9th ed., pp. 37–62). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782423928.1.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Spatial Information Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyChandidas MahavidyalayaKhujutipara, BirbhumIndia

Personalised recommendations