Advertisement

LMI-based LPV control strategy considering UAV systems

  • S. Samadzadeh
  • A. H. MazinanEmail author
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

This investigation presents a procedure of dealing with the quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle systems via the linear matrix inequalities based linear parameter varying (LMI-based LPV) control strategy under the state-of-the-art integration. It should be noted that this linear parameter varying technique has been introduced as an alternative gain scheduling process. As it implies the dynamics of the plant model as well as the controller are based on a set of time varying parameters, while these ones can be unknown in advance. It is to note that the aforementioned parameters may be measured in real time and therefore both the plant and the controller are changing as a function of operating conditions. This type of control strategy ensures the required performance, robustness and stability along all possible trajectories of the parameters to be guaranteed, theoretically. The scheduling parameters are taken into consideration as roll and pitch angles. The simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy in considering the stability and its tracking concerning the optimal references.

Keywords

Linear parameter varying strategy Linear matrix inequalities Quadrotor UAV systems Stability analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, H., Li, D., Zuo, Z., & Zhong, Y. (2016). Robust three-loop trajectory tracking control for quadrotors with multiple uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(4), 2263–2274.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Islam, S., Liu, P. X., & El Saddik, A. (2015). Robust control of four-rotor UAV with disturbance uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(3), 1563–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng, E., & Xiong, J. (2014). Quad-rotor unmanned helicopter control via novel robust terminal sliding mode controller and under-actuated system sliding mode controller. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 125(12), 2817–2825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pazooki, M., & Mazinan, A. H. (2018). Hybrid fuzzy-based sliding-mode control approach, optimized by genetic algorithm for quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 4(2), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazinan, A. H. (2015). A Lyapunov-based three-axis attitude intelligent control approach for unmanned aerial vehicle. Journal of Central South University, 22(12), 4669–4678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiong, J. J., & Zhang, G. B. (2017). Global fast dynamic terminal sliding mode control for a quadrotor UAV. ISA Transactions, 66, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleps-Dezasse, Michael, Bünte, Tilman, Svaricek, Ferdinand, & Brembeck, Jonathan. (2018). LPV feedforward control of semi-active suspensions for improved roll stability. Control Engineering Practice, 78, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, Shiqian, Sang, Yuanjun, & Jin, Hongbin. (2018). Robust model predictive control for stratospheric airships using LPV design. Control Engineering Practice, 81, 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verbandt, Maarten, Jacobs, Laurens, Turk, Dora, Singh, Taranjitsingh, & Pipeleers, Goele. (2018). Linear Control Toolbox—supporting B-splines in LPV control. Mechatronics, 52, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin, Rongyu, Chen, Xueqin, Geng, Yunhai, & Hou, Zhili. (2018). LPV gain-scheduled attitude control for satellite with time-varying inertia. Aerospace Science and Technology, 80, 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao, B., Xian, B., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2015). Nonlinear robust adaptive tracking control of a quadrotor UAV via immersion and invariance methodology. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(5), 2891–2902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, X., Xian, B., Zhao, B., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Autonomous flight control of a nano-quadrotor helicopter in a GPS-denied environment using on-board vision. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(10), 6392–6403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao, B., Xian, B., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2015). Nonlinear robust sliding mode control of a quadrotor UAV based on immersion and invariance method. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 25(18), 3714–3731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeghlache, S., Saigaa, D., Kara, K., Harrag, A., & Bouguerra, A. (2012). Backstepping sliding mode controller improved with fuzzy logic: Application to the quadrotor helicopter. Archives of Control Sciences, 22(3), 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santos, M., Lopez, V., & Morata, F. (2010). Intelligent fuzzy controller of a quadrotor. In IEEE international conference on intelligent systems and knowledge engineering (pp. 141–146).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perruquetti, W., & Barbot, J. P. (2002). Sliding mode control in engineering. Cambridge: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raffo, G. V., Ortega, M. G., & Rubio, F. R. (2008). Backstepping/nonlinear H∞ control for path tracking of a quadrotor UAV vehicle. In IEEE American control conference (pp. 3356–3361).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koval, M. C., Mansley, C. R., & Littman, M. L. (2010). Autonomous quadrotor control with reinforcement learning. http://mkoval.org/projects/quadrotor/files/quadrotor-rl.pdf.
  19. 19.
    Weng, K. W. (2006). Design and control of a quad-rotor flying robot for aerial surveillance. In Research and development, 4th IEEE student conference on SCOReD (pp. 173–177).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuan, C., Liu, Y., Wu, F., & Duan, C. (2016). Hybrid switched gain-scheduling control for missile autopilot design. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39, 2352–2363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lu, B., & Wu, F. (2004). Switching LPV control designs using multiple parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions. Automatica, 40(11), 1973–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Spatial Information Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Control Engineering, South Tehran BranchIslamic Azad University (IAU)TehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Control Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, South Tehran BranchIslamic Azad University (IAU)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations