Advertisement

Spatial Information Research

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 87–95 | Cite as

Airspace map design to implement customer-friendly service on unmanned aerial vehicles

  • JinYoung Kwon
  • YeonWoong Kim
  • Se-Hyu ChoiEmail author
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Academia and Industry collaboration on the Spatial Information

Abstract

Today, as the number of drones has suddenly increased, the problems of collision between drones in low altitude flight and Traffic control in drone flight have been highlighted. The collision between drones has a potential danger that can be extended to a very serious accident, which is directly linked to the second or third accident rather than the first accident. More detailed and thorough air traffic management is essential in order to minimize the collisions between drones and predict or address the collision before the collision occurs. However, the current unmanned traffic management technology is a basic research level and it is urgent to establish the concept. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to design and compare the airspace maps for drones, which is a core technical element in construction of drone Traffic control system. As a result of this study, based on the building height values in the conventional navigation map, a drone obstacle map for each airspace area is displayed. Also, the airspace classification is analyzed and the design definition and method for the uncontrolled drones are suggested.

Keywords

Airspace map Unmanned traffic management Drone traffic Drone obstacle map 

References

  1. 1.
    Vacca, A., & Onishi, H. (2017). Drones: Military weapons, surveillance or mapping tools for environmental monitoring? The need for legal framework is required. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Volovelsky., U. (2014). Civilian uses of unmanned aerial vehicles and the threat to the right to privacy—An Israeli case study. Computer Law & Security Report, 30(3), 306–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cole, D., Goktogan, A., Thompson, P., & Sukkarieh, S. (2009). Mapping and tracking. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 16(2), 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Iersel, W., Straatsma, M., Addink, E., & Middelkoop, H. (2018). Monitoring height and greenness of non-woody floodplain vegetation with UAV time series. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 141, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayat, S., Yanmaz, E., & Muzaffar, R. (2016). Survey on unmanned aerial vehicle networks for civil applications: A communications viewpoint. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 18(4), 2624–2661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erdelj, M., Natalizio, E., Chowdhury, K. R., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2017). Help from the sky: Lever- aging UAVs for disaster management. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 16(1), 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Um, J.-S. (2018). Evaluating patent tendency for UAV related to spatial information in South Korea. Spatial Information Research, 26(2), 143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-018-0163-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, J., & Sung, S. (2016). Evaluating spatial resolution for quality assurance of UAV images. Spatial Information Research, 24(2), 141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0015-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang, T., Geller, J., Ni, D., & Collura, J. (2016). Unmanned aircraft system traffic management: Concept of operation and system architecture. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 5(3), 125–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mualla, Y., Bai, W., Galland, S., & Nicolle, C. (2018). Comparison of agent-based simulation frameworks for unmanned aerial transportation applications. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiang, J., Liu, Y., & Luo, Z. (2016). Flight safety measurements of UAVs in congested airspace. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 5(29), 1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho, J., & Yoon, Y. (2018). How to assess the capacity of urban airspace: A topological approach using keep-in and keep-out geofence, Research article. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 92, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chandra, M., & JosephTanzi, T. (2018). Drone-borne GPR design: Propagation issues. Comptes Rendus Physique Review, 19(1–2), 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yanmaz, E., Yahyanejad, S., Rinner, B., Hellwagner, H., & Bettstetter, C. (2017). Drone networks: Communications, coordination, and sensing. Ad Hoc Networks, 68, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clothier, R. A., Williams, B. P., & Fulton, N. L. (2015). Structuring the safety case for unmanned aircraft system operations in non-segregated airspace, Research article. Safety Science, 79, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shijin, W. A. N. G., Xi, C. A. O., Haiyun, L. I., Qingyun, L. I., & Yanjun, W. A. N. G. (2017). Air route network optimization in fragmented airspace based on cellular automata. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 30(3), 1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Spatial Information Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Spatial InformationKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.Research Planning TeamR&D Institute, HYUNDAI MNSOFTDaeguSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations