Advertisement

Curriculum Perspectives

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 19–32 | Cite as

Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about the teaching profession, curriculum orientations, and personal responsibility

  • Altay ErenEmail author
  • Güler Çetin
Research article

Abstract

Working with 743 pre-service teachers from Turkey, the present study examined the relationships between beliefs about the teaching profession, curriculum orientations, and sense of personal responsibility, with the intention of exploring the mediating roles of curriculum orientations. Latent-factor correlation analysis and structural equation modelling analyses were conducted to analyse the data. The results showed that beliefs about expertise and difficulty in the teaching profession were significantly related to curriculum orientations. The results also demonstrated that humanistic and social reconstruction curriculum orientations played mediating roles in the relationships between beliefs about the teaching profession (i.e., expertise and difficulty) and sense of personal responsibility for student achievement and relationships with students. The results suggest that pre-service teachers’ beliefs about the teaching profession, curriculum orientations, and sense of personal responsibility for the diverse and challenging aspects of the teaching profession should be interpreted based on the mediating roles of their curriculum orientations.

Keywords

Beliefs Curriculum Responsibility Teacher 

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Bay, E., Gündoğdu, K., Ozan, C., Dilekçi, D., & Özdemir, D. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının program yaklaşımlarının analizi [Analysis of elementary prospective teachers’ curriculum orientations]. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 2(3), 15–29.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Cheung, D., & Ng, P. H. (2000). Science teachers’ beliefs about curriculum design. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 357–375.Google Scholar
  5. Cheung, D., & Wong, H. W. (2002). Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 225–248.Google Scholar
  6. Clore, G. L., & Ortony, A. (2008). Appraisal theories: How cognition shapes affect into emotion. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 628–642). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  8. de Vries, S., Jansen, E. P., Helms-Lorenz, M., & van de Grift, W. J. (2015). Student teachers’ participation in learning activities and effective teaching behaviours. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 460–483.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond, J. B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: the importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75–98.Google Scholar
  10. Dolton, P., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. (2013). 2013 global teacher status index. London: Varkey-Gems Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  12. Eisner, E. W., & Vallance, E. (Eds.). (1974). Conflicting conceptions of the curriculum. Series on contemporary educational issues. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  13. Eren, A. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının program inançlarının görünüm analizi [Profile analysis of student teachers’ curriculum beliefs]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 18(2), 379–388.Google Scholar
  14. Eren, A. (2014). Uncovering the links between prospective teachers’ personal responsibility, academic optimism, hope, and emotions about teaching: a mediation analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 17(1), 73–104.Google Scholar
  15. Eren, A. (2015). ‘Not only satisfied and responsible, but also hopeful’: prospective teachers career choice satisfaction, hope, and personal responsibility. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(2), 149–166.Google Scholar
  16. Eren, A., & Tezel, K. V. (2010). Factors influencing teaching choice, professional plans about teaching, and future time perspective: a mediational analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1416–1428.Google Scholar
  17. Eurydice. (2015). The teaching profession in Europe: Practices, perceptions, and policies. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  18. Eurydice. (2018). National education systems. Retrieved June 29, 2018 from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/quality-assurance-87_en
  19. Feng, L., Figlio, D., & Sass, T. (2018). School accountability and teacher mobility. Journal of Urban Economics, 103, 1–7.Google Scholar
  20. Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538.Google Scholar
  21. Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Canrinus, E. T. (2012). The factors influencing teaching (FIT)-choice scale in a Dutch teacher education program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 249–269.Google Scholar
  22. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A. S., & Bem, S. (Eds.). (2000). Emotions and beliefs: The influence of emotions on beliefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2014). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.Google Scholar
  27. Hannula, M., Evans, J., Philippou, G., & Zan, R. (2004). Affect in mathematics education- exploring theoretical frameworks. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education (PME) (pp. 125–154). Bergen: PME.Google Scholar
  28. Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884–1892.Google Scholar
  29. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. Herman, J. L. (2007). Accountability and assessment: Is public interest in K-12 education being served? (CRESST Report 728). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Retrieved June 10, 2015 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED499421.pdf.
  32. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320.Google Scholar
  33. Hout, M., & Elliott, S. W. (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education: Committee on incentives and test-based accountability in public education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jenkins, S. B. (2009). Measuring teacher beliefs about curriculum orientations using the modified-curriculum orientations inventory. Curriculum Journal, 20(2), 103–120.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004). Voices from the frontlines: teachers’ perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39), 1–34.Google Scholar
  36. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Review of Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.Google Scholar
  37. Lauermann, F. (2014). Teacher responsibility from the teacher’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 75–89.Google Scholar
  38. Lauermann, F. (2017). Teacher motivation, responsibility, pedagogical knowledge and professionalism: A new era for research. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession (pp. 171–191). Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Taking responsibility into account(ability): explicating its multiple components and theoretical status. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 122–140.Google Scholar
  40. Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2013). The meaning and measure of teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
  41. Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2014). Teacher responsibility: What does it mean for teachers’ motivation and emotions? In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Theory and practice (pp. 116–132). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834.Google Scholar
  43. Linn, R. L. (2006). Educational accountability systems (CSE Technology Report, No. 687). Los Angeles, CA: CRESST.Google Scholar
  44. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Lawrence-Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.Google Scholar
  47. Matteucci, M. C., & Guglielmi, D. (2014). Personal sense of responsibility and work engagement in a sample of Italian high-school teachers. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN14), Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2017). Generic teacher competencies. Ankara: Turkish Republic Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Teacher Training and Development.Google Scholar
  49. Moore, C. W. (2014). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Moors, A. (2013). On the causal role of appraisal in emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 132–140.Google Scholar
  51. Neophytou, L., Koutselini, M., & Kyriakides, L. (2011). The effect of teachers’ personal beliefs and emotional intelligence on quality and effectiveness of teaching. In A. Lauriala, R. Rajala, H. Ruokamo, & O. Ylitapio-Mäntylä (Eds.), Navigating in educational contexts (pp. 207–224). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.Google Scholar
  53. Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 353–377.Google Scholar
  54. Ng, P. H., & Cheung, D. (2002). Student-teachers’ beliefs on primary science curriculum orientations. New Horizons in Education, 45, 42–53.Google Scholar
  55. Olivant, K. F. (2015). “I am not a format”: teachers’ experiences with fostering creativity in the era of accountability. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(1), 115–129.Google Scholar
  56. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Building a high quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Background report for the international summit on the teaching profession. New York, NY: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2016). Is effective teaching stable? Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 23–47.Google Scholar
  58. Richardson, J. T. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147.Google Scholar
  59. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  60. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar
  61. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1585.Google Scholar
  62. Scherer, K. R. (1999). Appraisal theories. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 637–663). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  63. Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Silverman, S. K. (2010). What is diversity? An inquiry into preservice teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 292–329.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.Google Scholar
  66. Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size-or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282.Google Scholar
  67. Taneri, P. O., Nayir, K. F., & McNamara, G. (2014). Teacher candidates’ attitudes towards the teaching profession-worrying trends. Turkish Studies, 9(11), 529–545.Google Scholar
  68. Tuinamuana, K. (2011). Teacher professional standards, accountability and ideology: alternative discourses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 72–82.Google Scholar
  69. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558.Google Scholar
  70. van der Lans, R. M., van de Grift, W. J., & Van Veen, K. (2018). Developing an instrument for teacher feedback: using the Rasch model to explore teachers’ development of effective teaching strategies and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(2), 247–264.Google Scholar
  71. Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: development and validation of the FIT-choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 167–202.Google Scholar
  72. Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. G. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: an international comparison using the FIT-choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 791–805.Google Scholar
  73. World Bank. (2013). Promoting excellence in Turkey’s schools. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  74. Yüce, K., Şahin, E. Y., Koçer, Ö., & Kana, F. (2013). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: a perspective of pre-service teachers from a Turkish context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 295–306.Google Scholar
  75. Zembylas, M. (2011). Teaching and teacher emotion: A post-structural perspective. In C. Day & J. K. L. Lee (Eds.), New understandings of teacher’s work (pp. 31–43). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Curriculum Studies Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of EducationBolu Abant İzzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey

Personalised recommendations