Exploring the Relationships among Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Frustration, Agentic Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination in Adolescents with Disabilities
- 11 Downloads
Researchers have separately explored applications and implications of the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Causal Agency Theory in the school context; however, limited attention has been directed to examining the relations between constructs emerging from SDT (agentic engagement, motivation, and basic needs satisfaction and frustration) and the Causal Agency Theory (self-determination and its essential characteristics—volitional action, agentic action, and action-control beliefs), as well as the use of measures developed to assess these constructs in adolescents with disabilities. We examined the reliability of measures emerging from both theories in adolescents with disabilities, and explored the pattern of means, correlations, and predictive relations among the constructs. We found adequate reliability, and unique patterns of correlations and predictive relationships among the constructs. Adolescents with disabilities showed higher levels of need satisfaction than frustration, as well as moderately high levels of self-determination and agentic engagement, consistent with other research with students with and without disabilities. The findings highlight the role of constructs from positive psychology in the lives of students with and without disabilities and the need for more research that includes students with disabilities and explores their experiences alongside their peers without disabilities in developing causal agency.
KeywordsCausal Agency Theory Self-Determination Theory Adolescence Disability Measurement Schools
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R324A130065 to the University of Kansas. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
KAS: designed and executed the study, assisted with the data analyses, and wrote the paper. SKR: supported data collection, generated descriptive statistics, and assisted in writing the paper. MLW: collaborated on the design of the study and collaborated on editing the paper. EG: conducted the data analyses and edited the paper. JJ: supported study implementation and data collection. LAS: supported data collection and editing the paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures undertaken in this study were approved in advance by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Kansas.
IRB approved informed consent and assent procedures were followed for all participants in this study.
- Chang, R., Durham, J., & Little, T. D. (in press). Enhancing students’ motivation with autonomy-supportive classrooms. In M. L. Wehmeyer, K. A. Shogren, T. D. Little, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook on the development of self-determination. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., et al. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cordeiro, P., Paixão, P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Sheldon, K. (2016). Factor structure and dimensionality of the balanced measure of psychological needs among portuguese high school students. Relations to well-being and ill-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: a self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, A. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: an overview of Self-Determination Theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Frielink, N., Schuengel, C., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale–Intellectual Disability (BPNSFS-ID). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000366.
- Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Little, T. D., Snyder, C. R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2006). The agentic self: on the nature and origins of personal agency across the lifespan. In D. Mroczek & T. D. Little (Eds.), The hanbook of personality development (pp. 61–79). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
- Nishimura, T., & Suzuki, T. (2016). Basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration in Japan: controlling for the big five personality traits. Japanese Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12131.
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Reeve, J. (2002a). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Reeve, J. (2002b). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In Handbook of self-determination research. (pp. 183–203): University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2016). Relationship between basic psychological needs, motivation, causal action, and self-determination. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar
- Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2017). Self-Determination Inventory: student-report. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar
- Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A., Little, T. J., & Lopez, S. J. (2014b). Self-Determination Inventory: student-report [pilot version]. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar
- Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Little, T. J., & Lopez, S. J. (2015a). Causal agency theory: reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 251–263.Google Scholar
- Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Little, T. J., & Seo, H. (2017). Preliminary validity and reliability of scores on the Self-Determination Inventory: student report version. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415594335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., et al. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27(4), 302–314.Google Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). A functional theory of self-determination: model overview. In M. L. Wehmeyer, B. Abery, D. E. Mithaug, & R. Stancliffe (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: foundations for educational practice (pp. 182–201). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2017a). Applications of the self-determination construct to disability. In M. L. Wehmeyer, K. A. Shogren, T. D. Little, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook on the development of self-determination. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2017b). The development of self-determination during adolescence. In M. L. Wehmeyer, K. A. Shogren, T. D. Little, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook on the development of self-determination. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., Little, T. D., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook on the development of self-determination. New York: Springer.Google Scholar