, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 225–259 | Cite as

Use of weights in mixed randomized response model

  • Housila P. Singh
  • Swarangi M. GoreyEmail author
Original Paper


In this paper, we have suggested a weighted unbiased estimator based on mixed randomized response model. Some unbiased estimators are generated from the proposed weighted estimator. The variance of the proposed weighted estimator is obtained and relevant condition is obtained in which the proposed weighted estimator is superior to Singh and Tarray (Sociol Methods Res 44(4):706–722, 2014) estimator. It is interesting to mention that we have investigated an estimator \( \hat{\pi }_{{{\text{HS}}\left( 1 \right)}} \) which is the member of the suggested weighted estimator \( \hat{\pi }_{\text{HS}} \) provide better efficiency than the Singh and Tarray’s (2014) estimator \( \hat{\pi }_{\text{h}} \) and close to the optimum estimator \( \hat{\pi }_{\text{HS}}^{{\left( {\text{o}} \right)}} \). Thus, the estimator \( \hat{\pi }_{{{\text{HS}}\left( 1 \right)}} \) is an alternative to optimum estimator \( \hat{\pi }_{\text{HS}}^{{\left( {\text{o}} \right)}} \). The study is further extended in case of stratified random sampling.


Weighted estimator Mixed randomized response model Efficiency comparison 

Mathematics Subject Classification



  1. Chang HJ, Huang KC (2001) Estimation of proportion and sensitivity of a qualitative character. Mertika 53:269–280MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang HJ, Wang CL, Huang KC (2004a) Using randomized response to estimate the proportion and truthful reporting probability in a dichotomous finite population. J Appl Stat 53:269–280MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang HJ, Wang CL, Huang KC (2004b) On estimating the proportion of a qualitative sensitive character using randomized response sampling. Qual Quant 38:675–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaudhuri A, Mukerjee R (1987) Randomized response technique: a review. Stat Neerl 41:27–44MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhuri A, Mukerjee R (1988) Randomized response. Statistics: textbooks and monographs, vol 85. Marcel Dekker Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Christofides TC (2003) A generalized randomized response technique. Metrika 57(195):200MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox JA, Tracy PE (1986) Randomized response: a method of sensitive surveys. Sage, Newbury ParkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hedayat AS, Sinha BK (1991) Design and inference in finite population sampling. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong K, Yum J, Lee H (1994) A stratified randomized response technique. Korean J Appl Stat 7:141–147MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang KC (2004) A survey technique for estimating the proportion and sensitivity in a dichotomous finite population. Stat Neerlandica 58:75–82MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim JM, Elam ME (2005) A two-stage stratified Warner’s randomized response model using optimal allocation. Metrika 61:1–7MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim JM, Warde WD (2005) A mixed randomized response model. J Stat Plan Inference 133:211–221MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahmood M, Singh S, Horn S (1998) On the confidentiality guaranteed under randomized response sampling: a comparison with several new techniques. Biom J 40(2):237–242MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mangat NS (1994) An improved randomized response strategy. J R Stat Soc Ser B 56:93–95MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Mangat NS, Singh R (1990) An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77(2):439–442MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mangat NS, Singh R, Singh S (1997) Violation of respondent’s privacy in moors model—its rectification through a random group strategy response model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 3:243–255MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Moors JJA (1997) A critical evaluation of Mangat’s two-step procedure in randomized response. Discussion paper at Center for Economic Research. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh HP, Tarray TA (2012) A stratified unknown repeated trials in randomized response sampling. Commun Stat Appl Methods 19(6):751–759Google Scholar
  19. Singh HP, Tarray TA (2014) An efficient alternative mixed randomized response procedure. Sociol Methods Res 44(4):706–722MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh S, Singh R, Mangat NS (2000) Some alternative strategies to Moor’s model in randomized response model. J Stat Plan Inference 83:243–255MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tracy DS, Mangat NS (1996) Some developments in randomized response sampling during the last decade—a follow up of review by Chaudhuri and Mukherjee. J Appl Stat Sci 4:147–158zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Warner SL (1965) Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc 60:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Behaviormetric Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Studies in StatisticsVikram UniversityUjjainIndia

Personalised recommendations