Asymmetrical triadic relationship based on the structural difficulty
Using Bayesian inference, this study aims to estimate the magnitude of the cognitive load when a person perceives asymmetric social relations. Some empirical evidence relating to balance theory has shown that a balanced state is comparatively easier to memorize than an unbalanced one. In this study, since a balanced state is defined by structural complexity, an experimental hypothesis was set whereby asymmetric social relationships have different difficulty levels depending on structural complexity. The balanced state of an asymmetric relation as structural difficulty is formally derived from the eigenvalue structure of a Hermitian matrix. Asymmetric triadic relations are modeled as featuring three kinds of structural difficulties according to the eigenvalue decomposition of the Hermitian matrix and pattern-specific difficulties. The differences among the structural difficulties were not sufficiently significant to exceed pattern-specific difficulties, but the Bayes factor of the informational hypothesis of this research yielded positive effects.
KeywordsBalance theory Bayesian modeling Hermitian form model
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 16K13459 and special Thanks to Dr. Hiroshi Shimizu (Kwansei Gakuin Univ.) and Dr. Hirakawa Makoto (Hiroshima Univ.).
- Chino N (1997) Asymmetric multi-dimensional scaling. Genda Sugaku Sha, KyotoGoogle Scholar
- Chino N (2011) Asymmetric multidimensional scaling. J Inst Psychol Phys Sci 3(1):101–107Google Scholar
- Davis JA, Leinhardt S (1967) The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In: Berger J, Zelditch M Jr (eds) Sociological theories in progress, vol 2. Mifflin Company, Boston, pp 218–251Google Scholar
- Festinger L (1962) A theory of cognitive dissonance, vol 2. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- Kosugi K, Fujisawa T, Fujihara T (2004) Isomorphism of balance theory and Eigen-decomposition. Sociol Theory Methods 19(1):87–100Google Scholar
- Lee MD, Wagenmakers EJ (2014) Bayesian cognitive modeling: a practical course. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Nishisato S (1994) Elements of dual scaling: an introduction to practical data analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- Okada K (2014) Does Bayesian evaluation of informative hypothesis outperform analysis of variance? Jpn J Psychon Sci 32(2):223–231Google Scholar
- Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6(1):7–11. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
- Stan Development Team (2016) RStan: the R interface to Stan. http://mc-stan.org/ (R package version 2.14.1)
- Taylor H (1970) Balance in small groups. Litton Educational Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar