Advertisement

China Foundry

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 40–45 | Cite as

Effect of vibration on seepage feeding during low-pressure casting of ZL205A alloy

  • Ru-jia Wang
  • Shi-ping WuEmail author
  • Wei Chen
Research & Development
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Appropriate vibration can promote the feeding capacity of gravity casting, but the effect of vibration on the feeding of low-pressure casting is not clear. The effect of vibration on the seepage feeding of ZL205A alloy was investigated by vibration casting experiment and physical simulation. The aqueous solution of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with the same rheological characteristic of metal melt was used. The results show that vibration can improve the feeding capacity and reduce shrinkage defects of ZL205A alloy in lowpressure casting. The orthogonal physical simulation experiments indicate that vibration with low frequency and great exerted force can significantly improve the seepage velocity of non-Newtonian fluid with solid particles in porous medium. The seepage phenomenon in CMC solution shows that vibration can change the structure of accumulated particles at the seepage entrance, and thus open the blocked feeding channel. The numerical simulation of one-dimensional semisolid fluid seepage reveals that vibration can form a wave field in the porous medium, which can reduce the adhesion force between fluid and capillary wall and destroy the boundary layer of fluid, and thus promote the seepage velocity.

Key words

mechanical vibration physical simulation seepage ZL205A alloy 

CLC numbers

TG146.21 

Document code

References

  1. [1]
    Sang Baoguang. Numerical simulation and experimental study of inclusions and macrosegregation in the bottom-filled heavy steel Ingots. PhD Thesis, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Wang Jiaqi, Fu Paixian, Liu Hongwei, et al. Shrinkage porosity criteria and optimized design of a 100-ton 30Cr2Ni4MoV forging ingot. Materials and Design, 2012, 35: 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hardin R, Beckermann C. Prediction of the Fatigue Life of Cast Steel Containing Shrinkage Porosity. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A, 2009, 40(3):581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Li Bo, Shen Yifu, Hu Weiye. Casting defects induced fatigue damage in aircraft frames of ZL205A aluminum alloy–A failure analysis. Materials & Design, 2011, 32(5):2570–2582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Buffière J Y, Savelli S, Jouneau P H, et al. Experimental study of porosity and its relation to fatigue mechanisms of model Al-Si7-Mg0.3 cast Al alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2001, 316 (1-2): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lados D A, Apelian D. Fatigue crack growth characteristics in cast Al-Si-Mg alloys: part I. Effects of processing conditions and microstructure. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2004, 385: 200–211.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Linder J, Axelsson M, Nilsson H. The influence of porosity on the fatigue life for sand and permanent mould cast aluminium. International Journal of Fatigue, 2006, 28 (12): 1752–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wang Rujia, Wu Shiping, Chen Wei. Mechanism of burst feeding in ZL205A casting under mechanical vibration and low pressure[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2018, 28(8): 1514–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Mitrasinovic A, Hernández F C R, Djurdjevic M, et al. On-line prediction of the melt hydrogen and casting porosity level in 319 aluminum alloy using thermal analysis. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2006, 428(1): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Sun Y, Luo Jian, Mi G F, et al. Numerical simulation and defect elimination in the casting of truck rear axle using a nodular cast iron. Materials & Design, 2011, 32(3):1623–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Verran G O, Rui P K M, Rossi M A. Influence of injection parameters on defects formation in die casting Al12Si13Cu alloy: Experimental results and numeric simulation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2006, 179(1-3):190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Zhu L, Wang D, Zhang H. The Research and Application of Feeding Mechanism in the Solidification Process of Foundry Alloy. Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys, 1997, 6:34–38. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Zhang Ming, Zhang Weiwen, Zhao Haidong, et al. Effect of pressure on microstructures and mechanical properties of Al-Cu-based alloy prepared by squeeze casting. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2007, 17(3): 496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Li Min, Wang Hongwei, Wei Zunjie, et al. The effect of Y on the hot-tearing resistance of Al-5wt.% Cu based alloy. Materials & Design, 2010, 31(5): 2483–2487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Wang Y, Shi-Ping Wu, Xue X, et al. Formation mechanism and criterion of linear segregation in ZL205A alloy. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014, 24(11):3632–3638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Maltais A, Fiset M, Dubé D. An apparatus to grain refine metals and alloys with mold vibrations. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, 76(10): 647–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Wu Shi-ping, Wang Ru-jia, Wang Ye, et al. Reduction of shrinkage porosities in aluminum alloy castings by external pressure fluctuation under gravity field]. China Foundry, 2018, 15(5): 372–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Li Defu. Rheological research on flow-type defects in castings. Harbin Institute of Technology, 1995, Harbin.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Wang Rujia, Wu Shiping, Chen Wei. Unified wave equation and numerical simulation of mechanical wave propagation in alloy solidification. Simulation, 2019, 95(1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Zhi S Y, Xiang W A, Hua L J. Vibration Drag-reduction of Pipeline Transport of High Density Slurry. Mining & Metallurgical Engineering, 2001, 21(4): 4–6. (In Chinese)sGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Beresnev I A, Johnson P A. Elastic-wave stimulation of oil production: A review of methods and results. Geophysics, 1994, 59(6): 1000–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Guan R G, Wang X, Shang Y Q, et al. Shear Model of Metal Melt Flowing on Vibration Wall and Effect of Shear Stress on Solidification Microstructure. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2018: 1–9.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Kattamis T Z, Piccone T J. Rheology of semisolid Al-4.5% Cu-1.5% Mg alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1991, 131(2): 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Roberts G P, Barnes H A, Carew P. Modelling the flow behaviour of very shear-thinning liquids. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(19):5617–5623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Andrade E N C. LVIII. A theory of the viscosity of liquids — Part II. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1934, 17(113): 698–732.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Foundry Journal Agency and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations