Length-Weight Relationships of three Fish Species in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey

  • Ali Ismen
  • Mukadder Arslan Ihsanoglu
  • Hasim Inceoglu
Article

Abstract

Length-weight relationships (LWRs) are investigated for three fish species which sampled with a beam trawl between September 2011–July 2014 in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey: Callionymus maculatus (Rafinesque, 1810), Gaidropsarus biscayensis (Collett, 1890) and Lepidorhombus boscii (Risso, 1810). The data of length-weight relationship were found with W = 0.0042*L3.13(n = 20), TW = 0.0090*TL2.74 (n = 120) and TW = 0.0108*TL2.92 (n = 19), respectively. According to LWRs results C. maculatus showed positive allometry, G. biscayensis presented negative allometric growth and L. boscii isometric growth. The information about this issue are reported for the first time in the Sea of Marmara for such species. In this way this study is important with new results.

Keywords

Length-weight relationship Teleost fish Sea of Marmara 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study financially supported by TAGEM project no: TAGEM / HAYSÜD / 2011 / 09 / 02 /04. And the authors would like to thanks the staffs who helped in the laboratory and in the field work.

References

  1. Abdallah M (2002) Length-weight relationship of fishes caught by trawl off Alexandria, Egypt. Naga The ICLARM Quarterly 25(1):19–20Google Scholar
  2. Bagenal TB, Tesch FW (1978) Age and growth. In: Bagenal TB (ed) Methods for assessment of fish production in freshwater, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford, pp 101–136Google Scholar
  3. Bök TD, Göktürk D, Kahraman AE, Alicli TZ, Acun T, Ateş C (2011) Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the sea of Marmara, Turkey. J Anim Vet Adv 10(23):3037–3042Google Scholar
  4. Cengız O, Ozekinci U, Ismen A, Oztekin A (2013) Age and growth of four-spotted megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii Risso, 1810) from Saros Bay (Northern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Mediterr Mar Sci 14(1):36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coull KA, Jermyn AS, Newton AW, Henderson GI, Hall WB (1989) Length weight Relationships for 88 Species of Fish Encountered in the North East Atlantic. Scottish Fisheries Research Report Number 43. ISSN 0308 8022Google Scholar
  6. Demirel N, Murat Dalkara E (2012) Weight−length relationships of 28 f. sh species in the sea of Marmara. Turkish J Zool 36(6):785–791.  https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1111-29 Google Scholar
  7. Erzini K (1994) An empirical study of variability in length-at-age in marine fishes. J Appl Ichthyol 10(1):17–41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.1994.tb00140.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Froese R, Tsikliras AC, Stergiou KI (2011) Editorial note on weight-length relations of fishes. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 41(4):261–263.  https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2011.41.4.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holden MJ, Raitt DFS (1974) Manual of fisheries science. FAO Fish Tech Pap 115Google Scholar
  10. İlkyaz AT, Metin G, Soykan O, Kinacigil HT (2008) Length–weight relationship of 62 fish species from the central Aegean Sea, Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 24:699–702.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01167.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ismen A, Ozen O, Altinagac U, Ozekinci U, Ayaz A (2007) Weight-length relationships of 63 fish species in Saros Bay, Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 23(6):707–708.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00872.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IUCN (2015) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2015–4. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org
  13. Keskin Ç, Gaygusuz Ö (2010) Length- weight relationships of fishes in shallow waters of Erdek Bay (sea of Marmara, Turkey). IUFS J Biolog 69(2):87–94Google Scholar
  14. Mendes B, Fonseca P, Campos A (2004) Weight-length relationships for 46 fish species of the Portugese west coast. J Appl Ichthyol 20:355–361.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00559.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Merella P, Quetglas A, Alemany F, Carbonell A (1997) Length-weight relationship of fishes and cephalopods from the Balearic Islands (western Mediterranean). Naga The ICLARM Quarterly 20(3/4):66–68Google Scholar
  16. Morey G, Moranta J, Massuti E, Grau A, Linde M, Riera F, Morales-Nin B (2003) Weight–length relationships of littoral to lower slope fishes from the western Mediterranean. Fish Res 62:89–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00250-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Özekinci U, Cengiz O, Ismen A, Altinagac U, Ayaz A (2009) Length-weight relationships of thirteen flatfishes (Pisces: Pleuronectiformes) from Saroz Bay (North Aegean Sea, Turkey). J Anim Vet Adv 8(9):1800–1801Google Scholar
  18. Pauly D (1994) Quantitative analysis of published data on the growth, metabolism, food consumption, and related features of the red-bellied piranha, Serrasalmus nattereri (Characidae). Environ Biol Fish 41:423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pereda P, Villamor B (1991) Relaciones biometricas en peces de la plataforma Cantabrica. Informes Tecnicos Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia No. 92, 39 pGoogle Scholar
  20. Petrakis G, Stergiou KI (1995) Weight–length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters. Fish Res 21:465–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. J Fish Res Board Can Suppl. 1, vol. 2: 519–529Google Scholar
  22. Silva JF, Ellis JR, Ayers RA (2013) Length-weight relationships of marine fish collected from around the British Isles. Science Series Technical Report, Cefas Lowestoft, 150: 109 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1987) Introduction to biostatistics, 2nd Edition. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Sparre P (1992) Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment. Part I Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306/1. Rev 1. Rome, 376 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Sparre P, Ursin E, Venema SC (1989) Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part I. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 306. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  26. Stergiou KI, Politou CY (1995) Biological parameters, body length-weight and length-height relationships for various species in the Hellenic seas. Naga The ICLARM Quarterly 18:42–45Google Scholar
  27. Stergiou KI, Bobori DC, Ekmekçi FG, Gökoğlu M, Karachle PK, Minos G, Özvarol Y, Salvarina I, Tarkan AS, Vilizzi L (2014) New fisheries-related data from the Mediterranean Sea. Mediterranean marine. Science 15(1):213–224.  https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.738 Google Scholar
  28. Svetovidov AN (1986) Review of the three-bearded rocklings of the genus Gaidropsaurus Rafinesque, 1810 (Gadidae) with description of a new species. J Appl Ichthyol 26(1):114–135Google Scholar
  29. Veiga P, Machado D, Almeida C, Bentes L, Monteiro P, Oliveira F, Ruano M, Erzini K, Goncalves JMS (2009) Weight–length relationships for 54 species of the Arade estuary, southern Portugal. J Appl Ichthyol 25:493–496.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01230.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Ismen
    • 1
  • Mukadder Arslan Ihsanoglu
    • 1
  • Hasim Inceoglu
    • 2
  1. 1.Marine Science and Technology FacultyCanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCanakkaleTurkey
  2. 2.Republic of Turkey of Food, Agriculture and LivestockGeneral Directorate of Agriculture Research and PolicyBalikesirTurkey

Personalised recommendations