Diversity of Sponges in Marine Protected Areas of North Andaman, India

Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The continental shelf of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands harbours rich sponge diversity. Despite being one of the most important components of the reef ecosystem, comprehensive inventories of marine sponges of the protected areas of these Islands are still lacking. The present study was devoted to provide an outline of the sponge species composition of the island sanctuaries and adjoining areas of North Andaman and to compare the species assemblage from east and west coasts. The intertidal and subtidal sponges were surveyed from 41 sites covered under 23 locations (17 island sanctuaries and 6 undesignated locations) during March 2016 – September 2017. A total of 43 sponges distributed among 16 orders, 25 families and 35 genera were identified and recorded. The number of sponges per location was ranging from 6 to 20 in the east coast with a mean (mean ± SE) of 14 ± 2.07 and 3 to 21 in the west coast with a mean of 9.13 ± 1.44, indicating a significant difference on a spatial scale, notwithstanding the geographical proximity of the survey locations. Haplosclerida was the most represented order (9 species), contributing approximately 21% to the total sponge biodiversity, followed by Axinellida and Dictyoceratida (6 species). Two species namely, Carteriospongia foliascens (18 locations) followed by Neopetrosia exigua (16 locations) were dominant from the survey locations, indicating their ubiquitous occurrences throughout the survey locations. Sixteen growth forms were observed of which, cushions were the most dominant growth form (18.6%) followed by thin sheets (16.28%) and massive-globose (11.63%), suggestive of their survival ability in the coral-reef environments. Nevertheless, the significant differences in the species composition and growth forms among the survey locations are likely to be attributed to numerous ecological and environmental factors. Further research on sponges should be devoted in understanding their interaction with other fauna.

Keywords

Andaman and Nicobar Islands Distribution Diversity Porifera 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Kailash Chandra, Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata and Dr. C Sivaperuman, Officer-in-Charge, Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre of Zoological Survey of India, Port Blair for the facilities. The first author would like to acknowledge Mr. M.P. Goutham-Bharathi and Mr. Seepana Rajendra for their assistance during the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Annandale N (1915) Some sponges parasitic on Clionaidae with further notes on that family. Rec Ind Mus 11:457–478Google Scholar
  2. Bell JJ, Barnes DK (2000) A sponge diversity centre within a marine ‘island’. In: Island, Ocean and Deep-Sea Biology. Springer, Netherlands, pp 55–64Google Scholar
  3. Bhatnagar I, Pallela R, Bramhachari PV, Ealla KKR (2016) Chronicles of sponge biomaterials: the saga in biomedicine. In: Marine sponges: chemicobiological and biomedical applications. Springer, India, pp 315–327Google Scholar
  4. Burton M (1928) Report on some deep sea sponges from the Indian Museum collected by the R.I.M.S. "Investigator" part II. Tetraxonida (Concluded) and Euceratosa. Rec Ind Mus 30:109–138Google Scholar
  5. Burton M, Rao HS (1932) Report on the shallow-water marine sponges in the collection of the Indian Museum. Part I. Rec Ind Mus 34:299–358Google Scholar
  6. Costello C, Rassweiler A, Siegel D, De Leo G, Micheli F, Rosenberg A (2010) The value of spatial information in MPA network design. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:18294–18299. doi. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908057107
  7. Dam Roy S, Krishnan P, Raghunathan C, Vinith Kumar NV (2013) Cataloguing and Conservation of Marine Sponges of Andaman through DNA Barcoding. Project Completion Report submitted to Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Dendy A, Burton M (1926) Report on some deep sea sponges from the Indian Museum collected by the R.I.M.S. "Investigator". Part-I. Hexactinellida Tetraxonida (Pars) Rec Ind Mus 28:225–248Google Scholar
  9. Dunn CW, Leys SP, Haddock SHD (2015) The hidden biology of sponges and ctenophores. Trends Ecol Evol 30:282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehrlich H, Ilan M, Maldonado M, Muricy G, Bavestrello G et al (2010) Three-dimensional chitin-based scaffolds from Verongida sponges (Demospongiae: Porifera). Part I. Isolation and identification of chitin. Int J Biol Macromol 47:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galván-Villa CM, Ríos-Jara E, Bastida-Izaguirre D, Hastings PA, Balart EF (2016) Annotated checklist of marine fishes from the Sanctuary of Bahía Chamela, Mexico with occurrence and biogeographic data. ZooKeys 554:139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guidetti P, Baiata P, Ballesteros E, Di Franco A, Hereu B et al (2014) Large-Scale Assessment of Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas Effects on Fish Assemblages. PLoS ONE 9:e91841.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halpern BS, Warner RR (2003) Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 270:1871–1878.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooper JNA, van Soest RWM, (ed) (2002) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of the sponges. 2 Volumes. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang YM, de Voogd NJ, Cleary DFR, Li T-H, Hin-Kiu Mok J-PU (2016) Biodiversity pattern of subtidal sponges (Porifera: Demospongiae) in the Penghu Archipelago (Pescadores), Taiwan. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 96:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Immanuel T, Krishnan P, Raghunathan C (2015a) An updated report on the diversity of marine sponges of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands In: Venkatraman K, Sivaperuman C (eds) Marine faunal diversity in India. Academic, Elsevier, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  17. Immanuel T, Krishnan P, Raghuraman R, Veerappan N, Dam-Roy S (2015b) New records of Chondrilla australiensis and Chondrilla grandistellata (Demospongiae: Chondrosida: Chondrillidae) from Havelock Island, South Andaman, India. J Threat Taxa 7:8167–8172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Immanuel T, Raghunathan C (2011) First record of the sponge Damiria toxifera (Poecilosclerida: Acarnidae) from the Andaman Sea, Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Mar Biodivers Rec 4:e32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laxmilatha P, Sruthy TS, Varsha MS (2015) Marine Protected Areas. In: Joshi KK (ed). Summer School on Recent Advances in Marine Biodiversity Conservation and Management. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, pp 199–206Google Scholar
  20. Longakit MBA, Sotto FB, Kelly M (2005) The shallow water marine sponges (Porifera) of Cebu, Philippines. Sci Diliman 17:52–74Google Scholar
  21. Mutsenko VV, Gryshkov O, Lauterboeck L, Rogulska O, Tarusin DN et al (2017) Novel chitin scaffolds derived from marine sponge Ianthella basta for tissue engineering approaches based on human mesenchymal stromal cells: Biocompatibility and cryopreservation. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1955–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norman M, Zdarta J, Bartczak P, Piasecki A, Petrenko I, Ehrlich H, Jesionowski T (2016) Marine sponge skeleton photosensitized by copper phthalocyanine: A catalyst for Rhodamine B degradation. Open Chem 14:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pattanayak JG (2006) Marine sponges of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Rec Zool Surv India, Occ Paper 285. (Published by the Director, Zool Surv India, Kolkata)Google Scholar
  24. Petrenko I, Bazhenov VV, Galli R, Wysokowski M, Fromont J et al (2017) Chitin of poriferan origin and the bioelectrometallurgy of copper/copper oxide. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1626–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raghunathan C, Immanuel T, Raghuraman R, Venkataraman K (2017) Sponges of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Rec Zool Surv India, Occ. Paper. (Published by the Director, Zool Surv India, Kolkata)Google Scholar
  26. Rützler K (2004) Sponges on coral reefs: A community shaped by competitive cooperation. Bull Mus Ist Biol Univ Genova 68:85–148Google Scholar
  27. Schulze FE (1902) An account of the Indian Triaxonia collected by the Royal Indian Marine Survey Ship "Investigator" translated into English by R. von Lendenfeld. Trustees of the Indian Museum, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  28. Ubare V, Mohan PM (2016) A new species of genus Plakortis Schulze, 1880 (Porifera: Homoscleromorpha) from Badabalu, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Zool Stud 55:2.  https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2016.55-02 Google Scholar
  29. Van Soest RWM, Boury-Esnault N, Hooper JNA, Rützler K, de Voogd NJ, Alvarez B, Hajdu E, Pisera AB, Manconi R, Schoenberg C, Janussen D, Tabachnick KR, Klautau M, Piston B, Kelly M (2011) World Porifera Database Available online at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera
  30. Vinod K, George RM, Thomas PA, Manisseri MK (2012) Semperella megaloxea sp. nov. (Family: Pheronematidae): A new hexactinellid sponge from Andaman waters, India. Indian J Fish 59:33–36Google Scholar
  31. Wilkinson C, Evans E (1989) Sponge distribution across Davies Reef, Great Barrier Reef, relative to location, depth, and water movement. Coral Reefs 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wulff JL (2001) Assessing and monitoring coral reef sponges: why and how? Bull Mar Sci 69:831–846Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Andaman and Nicobar Regional CentreZoological Survey of IndiaPort BlairIndia
  2. 2.Zoological Survey of IndiaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations