Chinese Political Science Review

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 434–454 | Cite as

Theory of Politics and Political Legitimacy

  • Jean-Marc CoicaudEmail author
Original Article


The article explores the centrality of the issue of legitimacy in politics and theory of politics. First, it shows that in terms of epistemology and methodology, addressing the question of political legitimacy calls for being mindful of the specificity of social reality, as contrasted with physical reality. Second, it demonstrates that the centrality of political legitimacy presumes an understanding and analysis of politics as community. From this perspective, while a legitimacy approach to politics presupposes the existence of and need for power, it also presupposes that this power is not self-centered and primarily at the service of power holders. Rather the legitimacy of power rests on recognizing and fulfilling in a very significant manner a sense of responsibility toward the members of the community and the community itself.


Social sciences Political theory Power Community Legitimacy 


  1. Aristotle, 1995. Politics. Trans E. Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Beetham, David. 2013. The legitimation of power, 2nd ed. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D.A. 2015. The China model: political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clastres, Pierre. 1987. Society against the state. Trans. R. Hurley in collaboration with Abe Stein. Brooklyn: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Clausewitz, Carl von. 1989. On war. Trans. Michael Howard, Peter Paret. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coicaud, Jean-Marc. 2016. Theorizing the nexus emotions/passions, values and rights in international politics. In Emotions and passions in international politics: beyond mainstream international politics, eds. Yohan Ariffin, Jean-Marc Coicaud, Vesselin Popovski. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coicaud, Jean-Marc. 2007. Quest for international solidarity: benefits of justice versus the trappings of paranoia. In Globalisation and environmental challenges: reconceptualising security in the 21st century, eds. Hans Günter Brauch, John Grin, Czeslaw Mesjasz, Pal Dunay, Navnita Chadha Behera, Béchir Chourou, Ursula Oswald Spring, P. H. Liotta, Patricia Kameri-Mbote. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Coicaud, Jean-Marc. 2003. Leadership and effective communication. In Leadership and the United Nations (The International Leadership Series), ed. Adel Safty. USA: Universal Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Fallon, Richard H. 2018. Law and legitimacy in the Supreme Court. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forst, Rainer. 2017. Normativity and power: analyzing social orders of justification. Trans. Ciaran Cronin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fumurescu, Alin. 2013. Compromise: a political and philosophical history. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutman, Amy, and Dennis Dennis Thompson. 2012. The spirit of compromise: why government demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Heinich, Nathalie, and Des Valeurs. 2017. Une approche sociologique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Machiavelli. 2007. The prince. In The essential writings of Machiavelli (trans: Peter Constantine). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  17. Margalit, Avishai. 2013. On compromise and rotten compromises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Montesquieu, C. 1989. The spirit of the laws. Trans. Anne M. Cohler, Basia C. Miller, Harold S. Stone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pocock, J.G.A. 2016. The Machiavellian moment: florentine political thought and the Atlantic Republican tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2012. The social contract (The social contract and other later political writings). Trans. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.2008. The confessions. Trans. Angela Scholar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1980. Reveries of the solitary walker. Trans. Peter France. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  23. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.1979. Julie, or the New Heloise. Trans. Philip Stewart, Jean Vaché. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  24. Rousseau Jean-Jacques. 2007. Emile or on education. Trans. Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Schmitt, Carl. 2007. The concept of the political. Trans. George Schwab. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tönnies, Ferdinand. 2011. Community and society. Trans. Charles P. Loomis. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Weber, Max.1978. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Trans. Ephraim Fischoff, Hans Gerth, A. M. Henderson, Ferdinand Kolegar, C. Wright Mills, Talcott Parsons, Max Rheinstein, Guenther Roth, Edward Shils, Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fudan Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences (Fudan-IAS), Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Rutgers School of LawRutgers University, State University of New JerseyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations