Resolving display shape dependence issues on tabletops
- 62 Downloads
Advances in display technologies are transforming the capabilities—and potential applications—of system interfaces. Previously, the overwhelming majority of systems have utilised rectangular displays; this may soon change with digital devices increasingly designed to be ubiquitous and pervasive, to facilitate frictionless human interaction. At present, software is invariably designed assuming it will be used with a display of a specific shape; however, there is an emerging demand for systems built around interacting with tabletop interfaces to be capable of handling a wide range of potential display shapes. In this paper, the design of software for use on a range of differently shaped tabletop displays is considered, proposing a novel but extensible technique that can be used to minimise the influence of the issues of using different display shapes. Furthermore, we present a study that applies the technique to adapt several software applications to several different display shapes.
Keywordsvisual content management irregular displays screen design multi-touch surfaces tabletop displays ubiquitous computing
This work was partially funded under the UK’s EPSRC/ERSC Teaching and Learning Research Programme (TLRP) SynergyNet project (RES-139-25-0400). The authors would also like to thank Professor Liz Burd and Dr. Andrew Hatch supervising the primary author’s master degree from which this work originally stems. The authors would also like to thank the members of the Durham University Technology Enhanced Learning Special Interest Group for supporting the redrafting of this manuscript. Source code for the technique’s implementation is available at https://doi.org/github.com/synergynet/synergynet2.1.
- Dietz, P.; Raskar, R.; Booth, S.; van Baar, J.; Wittenburg, K.; Knep, B. Multi-projectors and implicit interaction in persuasive public displays. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 209–217, 2004.Google Scholar
- Boyd, J. Circular LCD debuts. 2007. Available at https://doi.org/spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/circularlcd-debuts.Google Scholar
- Finney, M. D.; Oliver, M. W.; Pierce, P. M.; Sutherland, T. Communication device. U.S. Patent USD600228. 2009.Google Scholar
- Battersby, S. J. Non rectangular display device. U.S. Patent 7,253,865. 2007.Google Scholar
- Shen, C.; Vernier, F. D.; Forlines, C.; Ringel, M. DiamondSpin: An extensible toolkit for around-thetable interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 167–174, 2004.Google Scholar
- Greenfield, A. Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing. Peachpit Press, 2006.Google Scholar
- Kitchenham, B. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Technical Report TR/SE-0401. Keele University, 2004.Google Scholar
- Serrano, M.; Roudaut, A.; Irani, P. Investigating text legibility on non-rectangular displays. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 498–508, 2016.Google Scholar
- Serrano, M.; Roudaut, A.; Irani, P. Visual composition of graphical elements on non-rectangular displays. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4405–4416, 2017.Google Scholar
- Gajos, K.; Weld, D. S. SUPPLE: Automatically generating user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 93–100, 2004.Google Scholar
- Constantine, L. L.; Lockwood, L. A. D. Software for use: A practical guide to the models and methods of usage-centered design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin Vol. 32, No. 1, 111–114, 1999.Google Scholar
- Scott, S. D.; Sheelagh, M.; Carpendale, T.; Inkpen, K. M. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer- Supported Cooperative Work, 294–303, 2004.Google Scholar
- Smith, S. P.; Burd, E. L.; Ma, L.; AlAgha, I.; Hatch, A. Relative and absolute mappings for rotating remote 3D objects on multi-touch tabletops. In: Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 299–308, 2011.Google Scholar
- Schöning, J.; Brandl, P.; Daiber, F.; Echtler, F.; Hilliges, O.; Hook, J.; Löchtefeld, M.; Motamedi, N.; Muller, L.; Olivier, P.; Roth, T.; von Zadow, U. Multitouch surfaces: A technical guide. Technical Report TUM-I0833. University of Munich, 2008.Google Scholar
- Aggarwal, A.; Suri, S. Fast algorithms for computing the largest empty rectangle. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, 278–290, 1987.Google Scholar
- Cotting, D.; Gross, M. Interactive environment-aware display bubbles. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 245–254, 2006.Google Scholar
- Joyce-Gibbons, A.; McNaughton, J.; Tan, E.; Young, N.; Beauchamp, G.; Crick, T. SynergyNet into schools: Facilitating remote inter-group collaborative learning using multi-touch tables. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Support Collaborative Learning, 2017.Google Scholar
Open Access The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Other papers from this open access journal are available free of charge from https://doi.org/www.springer.com/journal/41095. To submit a manuscript, please go to https://doi.org/www.editorialmanager.com/cvmj.