Advertisement

Granular computing-based multi-level interactive attention networks for targeted sentiment analysis

  • Haihui Li
  • Ting Yuan
  • Haiming Wu
  • Yun XueEmail author
  • Xiaohui Hu
Original Paper
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Targeted sentiment analysis has shown great promise in the field of e-commerce review processing. In recent years, research is ongoing to optimize the current targeted sentiment analysis approaches. This paper, from the innovation perspective, proposes a method referred to as granular computing-based multi-level interactive attention networks (GC-MIA). The method is constructed on the basis of granular computing. Each word is treated as an indivisible granule which constitutes the contexts and the target, respectively. Aiming at exploring the information within each word in the sentence, the multi-level interactive attention networks are established to make full use of every single granule. The representations of the target and the contexts are revised via multi-level interactive learning. Experimental results on the SemEval 2014 dataset are presented to verify the effectiveness of the GC-MIA model. The high accuracy indicates the significance of the proposed method in the targeted sentiment analysis.

Keywords

Targeted sentiment analysis Granular computing Interactive attention networks 

Notes

References

  1. Al-Smadi M, Talafha B, Al-Ayyoub M, Jararweh Y (2018) Using long short-term memory deep neural networks for aspect-based sentiment analysis of arabic reviews. Int J Machine Learn Cybern.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0799-4 Google Scholar
  2. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai Y, Yao Z, Cong F, Zhang L (2015) Event-related potentials elicited by social commerce and electronic-commerce reviews. Cogn Neurodyn 9(6):639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bo W (2018) Research on short text classification based on granular computing model and convolution neural network model. Master’s thesis, Anhui UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolton N (1977) Concept formation. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Chauhan SK, Goel A, Goel P, Chauhan A, Gurve MK (2017) Research on product review analysis and spam review detection. In: 2017 4th International conference on signal processing and integrated networks (SPIN). IEEE, New York, pp 390–393Google Scholar
  7. Chen SM, Chang YC (2011) Weighted fuzzy rule interpolation based on GA-based weight-learning techniques. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(4):729–744MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen SM, Chang CH (2015) A novel similarity measure between Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on transformation techniques with applications to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 291:96–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen SM, Tanuwijaya K (2011) Fuzzy forecasting based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships and automatic clustering techniques. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):15425–15437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen SM, Cheng SH, Chiou CH (2016) Fuzzy multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology. Inf Fusion 27:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng SH, Chen SM, Jian WS (2016) Fuzzy time series forecasting based on fuzzy logical relationships and similarity measures. Inf Sci 327:272–287MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan C, Gao Q, Du J, Gui L, Xu R, Wong KF (2018) Convolution-based memory network for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In: The 41st international ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval. ACM, New York, pp 1161–1164Google Scholar
  13. He R, Lee WS, Ng HT, Dahlmeier D (2018) Exploiting document knowledge for aspect-level sentiment classifcation. In: Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: short papers, vol 2, ACL, Melbourne, pp 579–585Google Scholar
  14. Hsu PY, Lei HT, Huang SH, Liao TH, Lo YC, Lo CC (2018) Effects of sentiment on recommendations in social network. Electron Mark.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0314-5 Google Scholar
  15. Jiang L, Yu M, Zhou M, Liu X, Zhao T (2011) Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, vol 1. Association for computational linguistics, ACL, Portland,  pp 151–160Google Scholar
  16. Jun W, Yuanyun W (2009) Research on granular computing and its application in image classification. Comput Eng Sci 31(3):49–51Google Scholar
  17. Liu P, Chen SM (2017) Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(9):2514–2530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu H, Cocea M (2017a) Fuzzy information granulation towards interpretable sentiment analysis. Granul Comput 2(4):289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu H, Cocea M (2017b) Semi-random partitioning of data into training and test sets in granular computing context. Granul Comput 2(4):357–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Luo X (2018) C2c interaction quality identifcation with svm based on kano model. Concurr Comput Pract Exp.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4689 Google Scholar
  21. Liu J, Zhang Y (2017) Attention modeling for targeted sentiment. In: Proceedings of the 15th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics: short papers, vol 2, ACL, Valencia, pp 572–577Google Scholar
  22. Liu H, Zhang L (2018) Fuzzy rule-based systems for recognition-intensive classification in granular computing context. Granul Comput 3(4):355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu H, Cocea M, Ding W (2018) Multi-task learning for intelligent data processing in granular computing context. Granul Comput 3(3):257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma D, Li S, Zhang X, Wang H (2017) Interactive attention networks for aspect-level sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 26th international joint conference on artifcial intelligence, AAAI Press, Morgan Kaufmann, Melbourne, pp 4068–4074Google Scholar
  25. Ma Y, Peng H, Khan T, Cambria E, Hussain A (2018) Sentic LSTM: a hybrid network for targeted aspect-based sentiment analysis. Cogn Comput 10(4):639–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63(2):81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nafees M, Dar H, Lali IU, Tiwana S (2018) Sentiment analysis of polarity in product reviews in social media. In: 2018 14th International conference on emerging technologies (ICET). IEEE, New York, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  28. Pang B, Lee L et al (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found Trends® Inf Retr 2(1—-2):1–135Google Scholar
  29. Tang D, Zhang M (2018) Deep learning in sentiment analysis. In: Deep learning in natural language processing. Springer, Singapore, pp 219–253Google Scholar
  30. Tang D, Qin B, Feng X, Liu T (2016a) Effective lstms for target-dependent sentiment classifcation. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th international conference on computational linguistics: technical papers, ACM,  Osaka, pp 3298–3307Google Scholar
  31. Tang D, Qin B, Liu T (2016b) Aspect level sentiment classifcation with deep memory network. In: Proceedings of the 2016 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, ACL, Austin, pp 214–224Google Scholar
  32. Wang Y, Huang M, Zhao L et al (2016) Attention-based LSTM for aspect-level sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 2016 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, ACL, Austin, pp 606–615Google Scholar
  33. Wang B, Liakata M, Zubiaga A, Procter R (2017) Tdparse: multi-target-specific sentiment recognition on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 15th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics: long papers, vol 1, ACL, Valencia, pp 483–493Google Scholar
  34. Xue W, Li T (2018) Aspect based sentiment analysis with gated convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: long papers, vol 1, ACL, Melbourne, pp 2514–2523Google Scholar
  35. Yao J (2005) Information granulation and granular relationships. In: 2005 IEEE international conference on granular computing, vol 1. IEEE, New York, pp 326–329Google Scholar
  36. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang S, Zhong H (2019) Mining users trust from e-commerce reviews based on sentiment similarity analysis. IEEE Access 7:13523–13535.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2893601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physics and Telecommunication EngineeringSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations