Advertisement

Modular precast concrete facing for soil-nailed retaining walls: laboratory study and in situ validation

  • T. T. BuiEmail author
  • M. Bost
  • A. Limam
  • J. P. Rajot
  • P. Robit
Case studies
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

A new concept for constructing the facing of soil-nailed walls is proposed and validated through experimental and numerical approaches. This new process uses precast concrete panels. For each excavation step, the soil reinforcements are first connected to the panels. A slightly cemented 4–6-mm crushed stone is then injected, through the weep holes, between the panels and the excavation vertical cut, applying a confining pressure to the ground and providing continuous high-capacity drainage behind the facing. The structural design of the precast reinforced concrete panel, based on full-scale loading tests in the laboratory and nonlinear numerical simulations, is presented in detail. Crack initiation and failure modes are properly predicted by the model. A full-scale experimental soil-nailed wall 7.5 m high was also built to evaluate the environmental, economic and mechanical performances of the new construction technique compared to the conventional shotcrete technique. The new construction technique greatly improves worker’s safety, significantly reduces construction duration and cost and improves the mechanical behaviour of the soil-nailing technique and drainage of the facing. Compared to the conventional shotcrete technique, the new technique reduces concrete consumption by 64% and greenhouse gases emission by 56%.

Keywords

Retaining wall Soil nailing Precast concrete Experiment Numerical simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research project was funded by NGE FONDATION, Saint-Priest, France.

References

  1. 1.
    Chavan D, Mondal G, Prashant A (2017) Seismic analysis of nail soil slope considering interface effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2017(100):480–491.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colin JG, Chouery-Curtis VE, Berg RR (1992) Field observations of reinforced soil structures under seismic loading. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on earth reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, vol 1, pp 223–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M, Koseki J, Uchimura T (1995) Geotextile-reinforced soil retaining wall and their seismic bahaviour. In: Proceedings of 10th Asian regional conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 2, pp 26–49.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juran I (1987) Nailed-soil retaining structures: design and practice. Transp Res Rec 12:139–150Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruce DA, Jewell RA (1986) Soil nailing: application and practice-part 1. Ground Eng 19(8):10–15Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schlosser F, Unterreiner P, Plumelle C (1993) Validation of calculation methods of soil nailed walls based on the experimentations of the National Project CLOUTERRE. Rev Fr Geotech 3:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/1993064011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menkiti CO, Long M (2008) Performance of soil nails in Dublin glacial till. Can Geotech J 45:1685–1698.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    TT Bui A Limam 2015 Paroi Clouée Préfabriquée: evaluation de la capacité portante d’une écaille constitutive: approche expérimentale et numérique. Internal report, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E (1989) A plastic-damage model for concrete. Int J Solids Struct 25:299–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee J, Fenves G (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. J Eng Mech 124:892–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nana WSA, Bui TT, Limam A, Abouri S (2017) Experimental and numerical modelling of shear behaviour of full-scale RC slabs under concentrated loads. Structures 10:96–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bui TT, Limam A, NaNa WSA, Roure T, Arrieta B (2018) Cast-in-place headed anchor groups under shear: experimental and numerical modelling. Structures 14:178–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ADEME (2014) Documentation des facteurs d'émissions de la Base Carbone ®, Version 11.0.0, Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jean de Sauvage (2018) Etude du comportement des murs de soutènement par clouage des sols en place : application au dimensionnement du parement. PhD doctoral dissertation. IFSTTAR, Bron, 30 Nov /2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Lyon, INSA Lyon, GEOMASLyonFrance
  2. 2.IFSTTAR, GERS-RROBronFrance
  3. 3.NGE FONDATIONSaint-PriestFrance

Personalised recommendations