Advertisement

Bearing capacity of strip footing resting on fibre-reinforced pond ash overlying soft clay

  • Sudhir AroraEmail author
  • Arvind Kumar
Technical Paper
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

The use of the industrial hazardous waste like pond ash to strengthen the soft clay (weak soil) is also helpful in solving the land requirement problem for its deposition. In the present study, the results of an investigation carried out on double-layer soil system have been presented. The model tests have been conducted with a strip footing resting on soil system which contains unreinforced and randomly distributed fibre-reinforced pond ash (RDFP) layer over soft clay. The effect of the pond ash layer thickness (i.e. 0.5B, 1.0B and 1.5B) compacted at optimum moisture content, the fibre length (6 mm, 12 mm and 18 mm) and the percentage of fibres in RDFP layer, i.e. 0.5%, 0.75% and 1.0% have been studied. The results have indicated that the provision of compacted pond ash layer and the addition of fibres into pond ash significantly influence the ultimate bearing capacity. The results in the form of bearing pressure ratio (BPR) have shown that the improvement with 1.5B thickness of RDFP and 1% of fibre inclusions is maximum. The validation of results has also been done using a finite element tool PLAXIS 3D.

Keywords

Pond ash Strip footing Polypropylene fibres Soft clay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The support of laboratory staff of NIT Jalandhar during the experimentation work is gratefully acknowledged by the authors.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta D, Kumar A (2017) Performance evaluation of cement-stabilized pond ash-rice husk ashclay mixture as a highway construction material. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bera AK, Ghosh A, Ghosh A (2007) Compaction characteristics of pond ash. J Mater Civ Eng 19(4):349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jakka RS, Ramana GV, Datta M (2010) Shear behaviour of loose and compacted pond ash. Geotech Geol Eng 28:763–778.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9337-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jakka RS, Datta M, Ramana GV (2010) Liquefaction behavior of loose and compacted pond ash. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(7):580–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar A, Gupta D (2016) Behaviour of cement-stabilized fiber-reinforced pond ash, rice husk ash-soil mixtures. Geotext Geomembr 44:466–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta D, Kumar A (2016) Strength characterization of cement stabilized and fiber reinforced clay-pond ash mixes. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2:32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0069-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta D, Kumar A (2017) Stabilized soil incorporating combinations of rice husk ash, pond ash and cement. Geomech Eng 12:85–109.  https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.12.1.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Priyadarshee A, Kumar A, Gupta D, Pushkarana P (2018) Compaction and strength behavior of tire crumbles-fly ash mixed with clay. J Mater Civ Eng 30(4):04018033.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh D, Kumar A (2017) Performance evaluation and geo-characterization of municipal solid waste incineration ash material amended with cement and fibre. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0094-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim B, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2005) Geotechnical properties of fly and bottom ash mixtures for use in highway embankments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(7):914–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bera AK, Ghosh A, Ghosh A (2009) Shear strength response of reinforced pond ash. Constr Build Mater 23:2386–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh SP, Sultana B, Ganesh R (2013) Assessing the suitability of bottom ash and coarse pond ash as filtering material. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, Dec 22–24, RoorkeeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gray DH, Ohashi H (1983) Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand. J Geotech Eng Div 109(3):335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gray DH, Al-Refeai T (1986) Behavior of fabric-versus fiber-reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng 112(8):804–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chandrasekaran B, Broms BB, Wong KS (1989) Strength of fabric reinforced sand under axisymmetric loading. Geotext Geomembr 8:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ranjan G, Vasan RM, Charan HD (1994) Behaviour of plastic-fibre-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 13:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Consoli NC, Prietto Pedro DM, Ulbrich LA (1998) Influence of fiber and cement addition on behavior of sandy soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(12):1211–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prabakar J, Sridhar RS (2002) Effect of random inclusion of sisal fibre on strength behaviour of soil. Constr Build Mater 16:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Michalowski RL, Cermak J (2002) Strength anisotropy of fiber-reinforced sand. Comput Geotech 29:279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yetimoglu T, Salbas O (2003) A study on shear strength of sands reinforced with randomly distributed discrete fibers. Geotext Geomembr 21:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar A, Walia BS, Mohan J (2006) Compressive strength of fiber reinforced highly compressible clay. Constr Build Mater 20:1063–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang MX, Javadi AA, Min X (2006) Triaxial tests of sand reinforced with 3D inclusions. Geotext Geomembr 24:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ibraim DE, Wood DM, Russell AR (2010) Fibre reinforced sands: experiments and modelling. Geotext Geomembr 28:238–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ashis Kumar Bera (2013) Study on unconfined compressive strength of pond ash soil mixture reinforced with jute geotextiles. Emir J Eng Res 18(1):59–65Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Divya PV, Viswanadham BVS, Gourc JP (2014) Evaluation of tensile strength-strain characteristics of fiber-reinforced soil through laboratory tests. J Mater Civ Eng 26(1):14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Botero E, Ossa A, Sherwell G, Ovando-Shelley E (2015) Stress-strain behavior of a silty soil reinforced with polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Geotext Geomembr 43:363–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Correia AAS, Oliveira PJ, Custodio DG (2015) Effect of polypropylene fibres on the compressive and tensile strength of a soft soil, artificially stabilised with binders. Geotext Geomembr 43:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharma V, Kumar A (2017) Strength and bearing capacity of ring footings resting on fibre-reinforced sand. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 3:9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0086-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sharma V, Kumar A (2017) Influence of relative density of soil on performance of fiber-reinforced soil foundations. Geotext Geomembr 45:499–507.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sharma V, Kumar A (2018) Behavior of ring footing resting on reinforced sand subjected to eccentric-inclined loading. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10:347–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yetimoglu T, Wu JTH, Saglamer A (1994) Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2083–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wasti Y, Butun MD (1996) Behaviour of model footings on sand reinforced with discrete inclusions. Geotext Geomembr 14(575):584Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Consoli NC, Casagrande MDT, Prietto PDM, Thome A (2003) Plate load test on fiber-reinforced soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(10):951–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hataf N, Rahimi M (2006) Experimental investigation of bearing capacity of sand reinforced with randomly distributed tire shreds. Constr Build Mater 20:910–916.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaur A, Kumar A (2014) Bearing capacity of eccentrically-obliquely loaded footings resting on fiber-reinforced sand. J Geotech Geol Eng 32(1):151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaur A, Kumar A (2016) Behaviour of eccentrically inclined loaded footing resting on fiber-reinforced soil. Geomech Eng Int J 10(2):155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kumar A, Walia BS (2006) Bearing capacity of square footings on reinforced layered soil. Geotech Geol Eng 24:1001–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-8852-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kumar A, Ohri ML, Bansal RK (2007) Bearing capacity tests of strip footings on reinforced layered soil. Geotech Geol Eng 25:139–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-0011-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hanna M, Meyerhof GG (1979) Ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on a three-layer soil, with special reference to layered sand. Can Geotech J 16:412–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dash SK, Sireesh S, Sitharam TG (2003) Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 21:197–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2005) Model studies of a circular footing supported on geocell-reinforced clay. Can Geotech J 42:693–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Meyerhof GG (1974) Ultimate bearing capacity of footings on sand layer overlying clay. Can Geotech J 11:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringDAV UniversityJalandharIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringDr. B R Ambedkar National Institute of TechnologyJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations