Advertisement

Utilization of the point load and block punch strengths to predict the mechanical properties of several rock samples using regression analysis methods

  • Reza Khajevand
  • Davood FereidooniEmail author
Technical Paper

Abstract

In the current research, laboratory investigations including mineralogical studies, X-ray diffraction analyses, physical properties, Schmidt rebound hardness, P-wave velocity, point load, block punch, Brazilian tensile and uniaxial compressive strengths have been carried out on fifteen rock samples to predict their mechanical properties from the point load and block punch strengths. The samples were four types of various sedimentary rocks including sandstone, limestone, travertine and conglomerate collected from the northern and northwestern parts of Damghan, north of Iran. Empirical relationships between the properties were determined using simple and multiple regression analysis methods. The simple regression analyses show reliable direct equations with high determination coefficients between the parameters. This is confirmed by three variables contour maps which indicated the mechanical properties were increased by increasing the other mechanical properties. Calculated values of the mechanical properties from the regression model were compared with experimental values of the parameters obtained from different laboratory tests. Also, strong relations were found between the values of point load index, block punch strength, Brazilian tensile strength and uniaxial compressive strength of the tested rocks from multiple regression analyses. Validating the empirical correlations was shown good agreement between experimental data and predicted results. Some statistical indices (e.g., RMSE, VAF and MAPE) were calculated for assessing the performance degree of models presented by multiple regression analyses. It was found that the models provide acceptable equations for predicting the mechanical properties.

Keywords

Rock sample Physical properties Mechanical properties Regression analyses Empirical equation 

References

  1. 1.
    Asadi M (2016) Optimized Mamdani fuzzy models for predicting the strength of intact rocks and anisotropic rock masses. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:218–224Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM (1995) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM standards on disc 04.08; Designation D2938Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM (1996) Standard test method for laboratory determination of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rock. Designation: D2845–D2895Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM (2001a) Standard method for determination of the point load strength index of rock. ASTM standards on disc 04.08, Designation, D5731Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASTM (2001b) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM standards on disc 04.08, Designation, D3967Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ASTM (2001c) Standard test method for determination of rock hardness by rebound hammer method. ASTM standards on disc 04.09, D5873-D5880Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bieniawski ZT (1975) The point-load test in geotechnical practice. Eng Geol 9(1):1–11Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Broch E, Franklin JA (1972) The point-load strength test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 9(6):669–697Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brook N (1985) The equivalent core diameter method of size and shape correction in point load testing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22(2):61–70Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canakci H, Baykasoglu A, Gullu H (2009) Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of Gaziantep basalts via neural networks and gene expression programming. Neural Comput Appl 18:1031–1041Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chau KT, Wong RHC (1996) Uniaxial compressive strength and point load strength of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(2):183–188Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diamantis K, Gartzos E, Migiros G (2009) Study on uniaxial compressive strength point load strength index, dynamic and physical properties of serpentinites from Central Greece: test results and empirical relations. Eng Geol 108:199–207Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diamantis K, Bellas S, Migiros G, Gartzos E (2011) Correlating wave velocities with physical, mechanical properties and petrographic characteristics of peridotites from the central Greece. Geotech Geol Eng 29(6):1049–1062Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diamantis K, Karamousalis T, Gartzos E, Migiros G (2012) Pulse transmission techniques for the characterization of serpentinites from Central Greece. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 45(3):369–378Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diamantis K, Gartzos E, Migiros G (2014) Influence of petrographic characteristics on physico-mechanical properties of ultrabasic rocks from central Greece. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(4):1273–1292Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Er S, Tugrul A (2016) Correlation of physico-mechanical properties of granitic rocks with Cerchar Abrasivity Index in Turkey. Measurement 91:114–123Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fener M, Kahraman S, Bilgil A, Gunaydin O (2005) A comparative evaluation of indirect methods to estimate the compressive strength of rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(4):329–343Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fereidooni D (2016) Determination of the geotechnical characteristics of hornfelsic rocks with a particular emphasis on the correlation between physical and mechanical properties. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:2595–2608Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fereidooni D, Khanlari GR, Heidari M, Sepahi-Gero AA, Kolahi-Azar AP (2016) Assessment of inherent anisotropy and confining pressure influences on mechanical behavior of anisotropic foliated rocks under triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(6):2155–2163Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Forster IR (1983) The influence of core sample geometry on the axial point-load test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20(6):291–295Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gokceoglu C (2002) A fuzzy triangular chart to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of Ankara agglomerates from their petrographic composition. Eng Geol 66:39–51Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gokceoglu C, Aksoy H (2000) New approaches to the characterization of clay-bearing, densely jointed and weak rock masses. Eng Geol 58:1–23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gong QM, Zhao J (2009) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(1):8–18Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geological Society of Iran (GSI) (1975) Geological quadrangle map of Iran, No. 6862, Scale 1:100000. Printed by Offset Press Inc, TehranGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haghnejad A, Ahangari K, Noorzad A (2014) Investigation on various relations between uniaxial compressive strength, elasticity and deformation modulus of Asmari formation in Iran. Arab J Sci Eng 39:2677–2682Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hassani FP, Scoble MJ, Whittaker BN (1980) Application of the point load index test to strength determination of rock and proposals for a new size-correction chart. In: Proceedings of the 21st U.S.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hawkins AB, Olver JAG (1986) Point load tests: correlation factor and contractual use. An example from the Corallian at Weymouth. In: Hawkins AB (ed) Site investigation practice: assessing BS 5930. Geological Society, London, pp 269–271Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heidari M, Khanlari GR, Kaveh MT, Kargarian S (2012) Predicting the uniaxial compressive and tensile strengths of gypsum rock by point load testing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:265–273Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    IAEG (1979) Classification of rocks and soils for engineering geological mapping, Part 1: rock and soil materials. Rep Comm Eng Geol Mapp Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 19:364–371Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ISRM (2007) The blue book: the complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring, 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, Turkey. Kazan Offset Press, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jenni JP, Balissat M (1979) Rock testing methods performed to predict the utilization possibilities of a tunnel boring machine. In: Proceedings of 4th congress international of the society rock mechanics, Montreaux, pp 267–273Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:991–994Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karakus M, Tutmez B (2006) Fuzzy and multiple regression modelling fore evaluation of intact rock strength based on point load, Schmidt hammer and sonic velocity. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39(1):45–57Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khanlari GR, Heidari M, Sepahi-Gero AA, Fereidooni D (2014) Determination of geotechnical properties of anisotropic rocks using some index tests. Geotech Test J 37(2):1–13Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khanlari GR, Heidari M, Sepahi-Gero AA, Fereidooni D (2014) Quantification of strength anisotropy of metamorphic rocks of the Hamedan Province, Iran, as determined from Cylindrical Punch, Point Load and Brazilian tests. Eng Geol 169:80–90Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kilic A, Teymen A (2008) Determination of mechanical properties of rocks using simple methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:237–244Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li D, Wong LNY (2013) Reply to comment by Saffet Yagiz on “Point load test on meta-sedimentary rocks and correlations to UCS and BTS” by Diyuan Li and Louis Ngai Yuen Wong. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:913–915Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liang M, Tonnizam EM, Faradonbeh RS, Armaghani DJ, Ghoraba S (2016) Rock strength assessment based on regression tree technique. Eng Comput 32:343–354Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mishra DA, Basu A (2013) Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock materials by index tests using regression analysis and fuzzy inference system. Eng Geol 160:54–68Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mishra DA, Basu A (2012) Use of the block punch test to predict the compressive and tensile strengths of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 51:119–127Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moradizadeh M, Cheshomi A, Ghafoori M, TrighAzali S (2016) Correlation of equivalent quartz content, Slake durability index and Is50 with Cerchar abrasiveness index for different types of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 86:42–47Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ozbeka A, Unsalb M, Dikeca A (2013) Estimating uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using genetic expression programming. J Rock Mech Geotechn Eng 5:325–329Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Read JRL, Thornton PN, Regan WM (1980) A rational approach to the point load test. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Australia–New Zealand conference on geomechanics, Wellington, New Zealand, vol 2, pp 35–39Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rusnak JA, Mark C (1999) Using the point load test to determine the uniaxial compressive strength of coal measure rock. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on ground control in Mining, Morgantown, WV, pp 362–371Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Salah H, Omar M, Shanableh A (2014) Estimating unconfined compressive strength of sedimentary rocks in United Arab Emirates from point load strength index. J Appl Math Phys 2:296–303Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schrier JS (1988) The block punch index test. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 38(1):121–126Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Singh TN, Kainthola A, Venkatesh A (2012) Correlation between point load index and uniaxial compressive strength for different rock types. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(2):259–264Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Singh VK, Singh DP (1993) Correlation between point load index and compressive strength for quartzite rocks. Geotech Geol Eng 11:269–272Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smith HJ (1997) The point load test for weak rock in dredging applications. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):295e1–295e13Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sonmez H, Tunusluoglu C (2008) New considerations on the use of block punch index for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of rock material. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1007–1014Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sulukcu S, Ulusay R (2001) Evaluation of the block punch index test with particular reference to the size effect, failure mechanism and its effectiveness in predicting rock strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:1091–1111Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N (2004) Considerations on strength of intact sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 72(3–4):261–273Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C (1997) The modified block punch index test. Can Geotech J 34:991–1001Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C, Sulukcu S (2001) Draft ISRM suggested method for determining block punch strength index (BPI). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:1113–1119Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vallejo LE, Walsh RA, Robinson MK (1989) Correlation between unconfined compressive and point load strengths for Appalachian rocks. In: Proceedings of the 30th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS), Morgantown, WV, pp 461–468Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yagiz S, Gokceoglu C (2010) Application of fuzzy inference system and nonlinear regression models for predicting rock brittleness. Exp Syst Appl 37:2265–2272Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yilmaz I (2010) Use of the core strangle test for tensile strength estimation and rock mass classification. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:845–850Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yilmaz NG, Yurdakul M, Goktan RM (2007) Prediction of radial bit cutting force in high-strength rocks using multiple linear regression analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(6):962–970Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Earth SciencesDamghan UniversityDamghanIran

Personalised recommendations