Advertisement

Prediction of earthquake occurrence for a new nuclear power plant in India using probabilistic models

  • Vansittee Dilli Rao
  • Deepankar Choudhury
Technical Paper
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

This paper has investigated the seismic risk in terms of earthquake occurrence in the vicinity of a newly proposed nuclear power plant (NPP) site in India. In this investigation, an extreme range of the risk has been estimated for large (Mw ≥ 6) and great (Mw ≥ 7 and 8) earthquakes by varying influencing parameters, such as average recurrence interval, standard deviation, probability distributions and time interval. Gutenberg–Richter and bounded Gutenberg–Richter recurrence relations were used to calculate the return periods of considered magnitudes. Three probability distributions: Weibull, lognormal, and Poisson models were chosen for the analysis. In each model, the standard deviation was varied from one-third to one-half of the mean. Results were presented in terms of cumulative probability and conditional probability for the next 15- and the 50-year time intervals from 2019. It has been highlighted that Mw ≥ 6 and Mw ≥ 7 are more likely to occur during the service life of the NPP. Moreover, this study can be used as an input for liquefaction seismic hazard assessment and in other earthquake-resistant design of nuclear power plant components for the new NPP.

Keywords

NPP Cumulative probabilities Conditional probabilities Probability distribution Risk Earthquake 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors want to acknowledge the financial support received through sponsored research project Grant Number 36(2)/15/04/2016-BRNS/36004-36029 (16BRNS012) from the Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, to carry out the research work presented in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board) (1990) Seismic studies and design basis ground motion for nuclear power plant sites. Standard AERB/SG/S-11. AERB, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chatterjee K, Choudhury D (2016) Influences of local soil conditions for ground response in Kolkata city during earthquakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A Phys Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-016-0265-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chatterjee K, Choudhury D (2018) Influence of seismic motions on behavior of piles in liquefied soils. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 42(3):516–541.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choudhury D, Shukla J (2011) Probability of occurrence and study of earthquake recurrence models for Gujarat state in India. Disaster Adv 4(2):47–59Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choudhury D, Phanikanth VS, Mhaske SY, Phule RR, Chatterjee K (2015) Seismic liquefaction hazard and site response for design of piles in Mumbai city. Indian Geotech J 45(1):62–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0108-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Desai SS, Choudhury D (2014) Earthquake catalogue for estimating seismic hazard at Greater Mumbai, India. Disaster Adv 7(10):69–78Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Desai SS, Choudhury D (2014) Spatial variation of probabilistic seismic hazard for Mumbai and surrounding region. Nat Hazards 71(3):1873–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Desai SS, Choudhury D (2015) Site-specific seismic ground response study for nuclear power plants and ports in Mumbai. Nat Hazards Rev 16(4):04015002_1-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferraes SG (2003) The conditional probability of earthquake occurrence and the next large earthquake in Tokyo, Japan. J Seismol 7(2):145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34(4):185–188Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagiwara Y (1974) Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain. Tectonophysics 23(3):313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    IS 1893 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision), Bureau of Indian Standard, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnston AC, Nava SJ (1985) Recurrence rates and probability estimates for the New Madrid seismic zone. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 90(B8):6737–6753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGuire RK, Arabasz WJ (1990) An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Geotech Environ Geophys 1:333–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mhaske SY, Choudhury D (2010) GIS-based soil liquefaction susceptibility map of Mumbai city for earthquake events. J Appl Geophys 70(3):216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naik NP, Choudhury D (2014) Comparative study of seismic ground responses using DEEPSOIL, SHAKE, and D-MOD for soils of Goa, India. Geo-Congress 2014: Geotechnical Special Publication No. GSP 234, ASCE.  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.107
  17. 17.
    Naik N, Choudhury D (2015) Deterministic seismic hazard analysis considering different seismicity levels for the state of Goa, India. Nat Hazards 75(1):557–580.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1346-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parvez IA, Ram A (1997) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards in the north-east Indian peninsula and Hindukush regions. Pure Appl Geophys 149(4):731–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parvez IA, Ram A (1999) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards in the Indian subcontinent. Pure Appl Geophys 154(1):23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phanikanth VS, Choudhury D, Reddy GR (2011) Equivalent-linear seismic ground response analysis of some typical sites in Mumbai. Geotech Geol Eng 29(6):1109–1126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9443-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phule RR, Choudhury D (2017) Seismic reliability-based analysis and GIS mapping of cyclic mobility of clayey soils of Mumbai city, India. Nat Hazards 85(1):139–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2570-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phule RR, Choudhury D (2018) Assessing and mapping seismic liquefaction hazard, vulnerability, and risk of the transportation infrastructure of Mumbai city, India. Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V: seismic hazard analysis, earthquake ground motions, and regional-scale assessment, Geotechnical Special Publication No. GSP 291, ASCE, 658-666.  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481462.064
  23. 23.
    Rikitake T (1991) Assessment of earthquake hazard in the Tokyo area, Japan. Tectonophysics 199(1):121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shanker D, Sharma ML (1998) Estimation of seismic hazard parameters for the Himalayas and its vicinity from complete data files. Pure Appl Geophys 152(2):267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharma ML (2003) Seismic hazard in the northern India region. Seismol Res Lett 74(2):141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharma ML, Kumar R (2008) Conditional probabilities of occurrence of moderate earthquakes in Indian region. In: 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shukla J, Choudhury D (2012) Seismic hazard and site-specific ground motion for typical ports of Gujarat. Nat Hazards 60(2):541–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shukla J, Choudhury D (2012) Estimation of seismic ground motions using deterministic approach for major cities of Gujarat. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2019–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shylamoni P, Choudhury D, Ghosh S, Ghosh AK, Basu PC (2014) Seismic ground response analysis of KK-NPP site in the event of NCO earthquake using DEEPSOIL. In Geo-Congress 2014: Geotechnical Special Publication No. GSP 234, ASCE, 840-849.  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.082
  30. 30.
    Tripathi JN (2006) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in the January 26, 2001 earthquake region of Gujrat, India. J Seismol 10(1):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Utsu T (1984) Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 59:53–66Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yadav RBS, Tripathi JN, Rastogi BK, Chopra S (2008) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard in Gujarat and adjoining region of India. Pure Appl Geophys 165:1813–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yadav RBS, Tripathi JN, Rastogi BK, Das MC, Chopra S (2010) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in northeast India and adjoining regions. Pure Appl Geophys 167(11):1331–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology Bombay, IIT BombayPowai, MumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR CampusChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations