Prediction of earthquake occurrence for a new nuclear power plant in India using probabilistic models
- 84 Downloads
This paper has investigated the seismic risk in terms of earthquake occurrence in the vicinity of a newly proposed nuclear power plant (NPP) site in India. In this investigation, an extreme range of the risk has been estimated for large (Mw ≥ 6) and great (Mw ≥ 7 and 8) earthquakes by varying influencing parameters, such as average recurrence interval, standard deviation, probability distributions and time interval. Gutenberg–Richter and bounded Gutenberg–Richter recurrence relations were used to calculate the return periods of considered magnitudes. Three probability distributions: Weibull, lognormal, and Poisson models were chosen for the analysis. In each model, the standard deviation was varied from one-third to one-half of the mean. Results were presented in terms of cumulative probability and conditional probability for the next 15- and the 50-year time intervals from 2019. It has been highlighted that Mw ≥ 6 and Mw ≥ 7 are more likely to occur during the service life of the NPP. Moreover, this study can be used as an input for liquefaction seismic hazard assessment and in other earthquake-resistant design of nuclear power plant components for the new NPP.
KeywordsNPP Cumulative probabilities Conditional probabilities Probability distribution Risk Earthquake
Authors want to acknowledge the financial support received through sponsored research project Grant Number 36(2)/15/04/2016-BRNS/36004-36029 (16BRNS012) from the Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, to carry out the research work presented in this paper.
- 1.AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board) (1990) Seismic studies and design basis ground motion for nuclear power plant sites. Standard AERB/SG/S-11. AERB, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- 4.Choudhury D, Shukla J (2011) Probability of occurrence and study of earthquake recurrence models for Gujarat state in India. Disaster Adv 4(2):47–59Google Scholar
- 6.Desai SS, Choudhury D (2014) Earthquake catalogue for estimating seismic hazard at Greater Mumbai, India. Disaster Adv 7(10):69–78Google Scholar
- 10.Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34(4):185–188Google Scholar
- 12.IS 1893 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision), Bureau of Indian Standard, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- 16.Naik NP, Choudhury D (2014) Comparative study of seismic ground responses using DEEPSOIL, SHAKE, and D-MOD for soils of Goa, India. Geo-Congress 2014: Geotechnical Special Publication No. GSP 234, ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.107
- 22.Phule RR, Choudhury D (2018) Assessing and mapping seismic liquefaction hazard, vulnerability, and risk of the transportation infrastructure of Mumbai city, India. Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V: seismic hazard analysis, earthquake ground motions, and regional-scale assessment, Geotechnical Special Publication No. GSP 291, ASCE, 658-666. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481462.064
- 26.Sharma ML, Kumar R (2008) Conditional probabilities of occurrence of moderate earthquakes in Indian region. In: 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
- 29.Shylamoni P, Choudhury D, Ghosh S, Ghosh AK, Basu PC (2014) Seismic ground response analysis of KK-NPP site in the event of NCO earthquake using DEEPSOIL. In Geo-Congress 2014: Geotechnical Special Publication No. GSP 234, ASCE, 840-849. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.082
- 31.Utsu T (1984) Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 59:53–66Google Scholar