Advertisement

Ettringite induced heaving in stabilized high sulfate soils

  • Anand J. Puppala
  • Nagasreenivasu Talluri
  • Surya Sarat Chandra Congress
  • Ahmed Gaily
Technical Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Stabilization of expansive soils using lime and cement additives have been used by practitioners over the years. However, recent heaving and premature pavement failures in lime and cement-treated subgrades containing sulfates led to questioning the use of calcium-based stabilization methods for these soils. Annually, millions of dollars are spent to repair pavements distressed by this Ettringite induced heaving. Based on the past studies, researchers and practitioners have proposed various methods to treat sulfate soils. Applicability of these methods is mostly limited to soils with sulfate levels below 8000 ppm. Soils with sulfate content above 8000 ppm are termed as “high sulfate” soils, and chemical treatment of such soils is currently not considered. A research study was designed to aid in understanding the heaving phenomenon in soils with sulfate contents above 8000 ppm and to develop practical techniques to stabilize such soils. High sulfate soils were sampled and treated with lime at varying mellowing periods and treated soils were then subjected to the engineering and chemical tests. Tests results were analyzed to understand the effectiveness of mellowing period on the heaving phenomenon of these soils. Treated soils at higher mellowing periods showed reduced sulfate-induced heaving when sulfate levels are lower than 30,000 ppm. Sulfate levels in excess of 30,000 ppm did not result in effective treatment of soils. It was also observed that compaction void ratios and soil clay mineralogy have a significant impact on the swell behavior of chemically treated high sulfate soils. An innovative method comprising of aerial technologies is used to monitor the pavement heaving. This keynote paper provides a comprehensive review of stabilization of high sulfate soils and methods studied to mitigate sulfate heaving.

Keywords

Infrastructure Expansive soils Sulfate soils Stabilization Unmanned aerial vehicles Durability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Joe Adams of TxDOT, Jimmy Si of TxDOT, Wade Blackmon of TxDOT Paris District and Richard Williammee of Fort Worth District, for their guidance, support and supervision through the project time period. We acknowledge the funding support from TxDOT for the project.

References

  1. 1.
    Berger E, Little DN, Graves R (2001) Technical memorandum: guidelines for stabilization of soils containing sulfate. http://www.lime.org/publications.html. Accessed September 2010
  2. 2.
    Carter DL, Heilman MD, Gonzales CL (1965) Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether for determining surface area of silicate minerals. Soil Sci 100:356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chapman HD (1965) Cation-exchange capacity 1. In: Black CA et al. (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2—Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 891–901Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen FH (1988) Foundations on expansive soils. Dev Geotech Eng 12:12Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chittoori B, Puppala AJ (2011) Quantitative estimation of clay mineralogy in fine-grained soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(11):997–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dermatas D (1995) Ettringite-induced swelling in soils: state-of-the-art. Appl Mech Rev 48:659–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eades JL, Grim RE (1966) A quick test to determine lime requirements for lime stabilization. Highw Res Rec 139:61–72Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foster HM (1953) Geochemical studies of clay minerals III. The determination of free silica and free alumina in Montmorillonites. Geochem Cosmochim Acta 3:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freese K, Abbas A, Senko J, Cutright TJ (2015) Assessment of process variables that can impact results of soluble sulfate evaluated by the Tex-145E method. J Test Eval 43(6):1472–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris JP, Von Holdt J, Sebesta S, Scullion T (2006) Recommendations for stabilization of high-sulfate soils in Texas. Transportation Research Record No. 1952. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 71–79Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hausmann MR (1990) Engineering principles of ground modification. McGraw–Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunter D (1989) The geochemistry of lime-induced heave in sulfate bearing clay soils. In: Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, RenoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hunter D (1988) Lime-induced heave in sulfate-bearing clay soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 114:150–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kota BVS (1996) Sulfate bearing soils: problems with calcium based stabilizers, vol 1546. Transportation Research Record. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 62–69Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF (1982) Lithium, sodium, and potassium. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2—Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 225–246Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Little DN, Nair S, Herbert B (2010) Addressing sulfate-induced heave in lime treated soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehta PK (1973) Effect of lime on hydration of pastes containing gypsum and calcium aluminate or calcium sulfoaluminate. J Am Cer Soc 56:315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitchell JK, Dermatas D (1992) Clay soil heave caused by lime-sulfate reactions. ASTM Spec Publ 1135:41–64Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitchell JK (1986) Practical problems from surprising soil behavior. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 112(3):259–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson DJ, Miller JD (1992) Expansive soils: problems and practice in foundation and pavement engineering. Wiley, Hoboken, p 259Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ogawa K, Roy DM (1982) C4A3S hydration, ettringite formation and its expansion mechanism: part II, microstructural observation of expansion. Cem Concr Res 12:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perrin L (1992) Expansion of lime-treated clays containing sulfates. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on expansive soils, ASCE Expansive Soil Research Council, New York, vol 1, pp 409–414Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petry TM, Little DN (1992) Update on sulfate induced heave in treated clays: problematic sulfate levels. Transportation Research Board, TRR 1362, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puppala A, Musenda C (2000) Effects of fiber reinforcement on strength and volume change in expansive soils. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res board 1736(1):134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Puppala AJ, Hanchanloet S, Jadeja M, Burkart B (1999) Sulfate induced heave distress: a case study. In: Proceedings, transportation research board annual meeting, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Puppala AJ, Viyanant C, Kruzic AP, Perrin L (2002) Evaluation of a modified soluble sulfate determination method for fine-grained cohesive soils. Geotech Test J GTJODJ 25(1):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Puppala AJ, Wattanasanticharoen E, Punthutaecha K (2003) Experimental evaluations of stabilization methods for sulphate-rich expansive soils. Ground Improv 7(1):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Puppala AJ, Katha B, Hoyos LR (2004) Volumetric shrinkage strain measurements in expansive soils using digital imaging technology. ASTM Geotech Test J 27(6):547–556Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Puppala AJ, Intharasombat N, Vempati R (2005) Experimental studies on ettringite induced heaving in soils. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 31(3):325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Puppala AJ, Wattanasanticharoen E, Punthutaecha K (2005) Experimental evaluations of stabilisation methods for sulphate-rich expansive soils. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv 9(2):89–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Puppala AJ, Talluri NS, Chittoori BS, Gaily A (2012) Lessons learned from sulfate induced heaving studies in chemically treated soils. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ground improvement and ground control. Research Publishing, pp 85–98Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Puppala AJ, Congress SSC, Bheemasetti TV, Caballero S (2018) Visualization of civil infrastructure emphasizing geomaterial characterization and performance. ASCE J Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Puppala AJ, Congress SSC, Bheemasetti TV, Caballero S (2018) geotechnical data visualization and modeling of civil infrastructure projects. In: GeoShanghai international conference, pp 1–12, Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Talluri N, Gaily A, Puppala AJ, Chittoori B (2012) Comparative study of soluble sulfate measurement technqiues. In: GeoCongress 2012, Oakland CA March 2–29, GSP 225, pp 3372–3381Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Talluri N et al (2013) Stabilization of high sulfate soils by extended mellowing. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anand J. Puppala
    • 1
  • Nagasreenivasu Talluri
    • 1
  • Surya Sarat Chandra Congress
    • 1
  • Ahmed Gaily
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringThe University of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations