Advertisement

Soil–structure interaction analysis in natural heterogeneous deposits using random field theory

  • Shahrzad Mohseni
  • Meghdad Payan
  • Reza Jamshidi ChenariEmail author
Technical Note
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Inherent variability of soil properties induces inevitable sources of uncertainties in geotechnical analyses. Hence, deterministic evaluation of geostructure performance may lead to undesired unconservative outcomes which in turn may result in the system failure. In this study, a numerical simulation approach is employed to examine the influence of variation of different random soil properties on the soil–structure interaction phenomenon as well as the subgrade reaction coefficient within the shallow foundation analysis framework. Implementing Monte Carlo simulations along with the random field theory into the finite difference numerical iterations, several probabilistic analyses are performed in an undrained condition. The results of stochastic simulations illustrate the significant influence of incorporating the spatial variability of index soil properties on the response analysis of shallow foundations above heterogeneous soil strata. In particular, heterogeneity of soil layer is observed to bear a remarkable role in the evaluation of subgrade reaction coefficient. Adopting the results of numerical analysis, it is observed that as the coefficient of variation and as a result, heterogeneity of soil layers increases, the mean subgrade reaction coefficient decreases. The descending rate of mean subgrade reaction coefficient decreases as the scale of fluctuation increases and the soil behaviour tends towards the homogeneous state.

Keywords

Subgrade reaction coefficient Heterogeneity Spatial variability Random field theory Monte Carlo simulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Baecher GB, Ingra TS (1981) Stochastic FEM in settlement predictions. J Geotech Eng ASCE 107(4):449–463Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherubini C (1997) Data and considerations on the variability of geotechnical properties of soils. Proc Int Conf Saf Reliab (ES-REL) 97(2):1583–1591Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cherubini C (2000) Reliability evaluation of shallow foundation bearing capacity on c, φ soils. Can Geotech J 37:264–269Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho SE, Park HC (2009) Effect of spatial variability of cross-correlated soil properties on bearing capacity of strip footing. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 34(1):1–26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daloglu AT, Vallabhan CVG (2000) Values of k for slab on Winkler foundation. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126(5):463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duncan JM (2000) Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126(4):307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Ramly H, Morgenstern NR, Cruden DM (2002) Probabilistic slope stability analysis of tailing dyke on presheared clay–shale. Can Geotech J 39:665–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El-Ramly H, Morgenstern NR, Cruden DM (2003) Probabilistic stability analysis of a tailings dyke on presheared clay–shale. Can Geotech J 40:192–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2002) Probabilistic foundation settlement on spatially random soil. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng ASCE 128(5):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2003) Bearing capacity prediction of spatially random c-u soils. Can Geotech J 40(1):54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2007) The random finite element method (RFEM) in bearing capacity analyses. Prob Methods Geotech Eng CISM Courses Lect 49:295–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fenton GA, Vanmarcke EH (1998) Spatial variation in liquefaction risk. Geotechnique 48:819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gibson RE (1967) Some results concerning displacements and stresses in a non-homogeneous elastic half-space. Geotechnique 17:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2001) Bearing capacity of spatially random soil: the undrained clay Prandtl problem revisited. Geotechnique 51(4):351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2004) Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(5):507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haldar S, Babu Sivakumar GL (2007) Effect of soil spatial variability on the response of laterally loaded pile in undrained clay. Comput Geotech 35:537–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haldar S, Babu Sivakumar GL (2012) Response of vertically loaded pile in clay: a probabilistic study. Geotech Geol Eng Int J 30(1):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harr ME (1987) Reliability based design in civil engineering. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hicks MA, Samy K (2002) Influence of heterogeneity on undrained clay SLOPE stability. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 35(1):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hicks MA, Samy K (2004) Stochastic evaluation of heterogeneous slope stability. Italian Geotech J (Rivista Italiana di Geotechnica) 38:54–66Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horvath JS (1983) Modulus of subgrade reaction: new perspective. J Geotech Eng 109(12):1591–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jamshidi Chenari R, Alaie R (2015) Effects of anisotropy in correlation structure on the stability of an undrained clay slope. Georisk.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2015.1037844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jamshidi Chenari R, Kamyab Farahbakhsh H (2015) Generating non-stationary random fields of auto-correlated, normally distributed CPT profile by matrix decomposition method. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 9(2):96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jamshidi Chenari R, Zamanzadeh M (2016) Uncertainty assessment of critical excavation depth of vertical unsupported cuts in undrained clay using random field theorem. Int J Sci Technol (Scientica Iranica) 23(3):864–875Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jamshidi Chenari R, Ghorbani A, Eslami A, Alaie R (2018a) Behavior of piled raft foundation on heterogeneous clay deposits using random field theory. Civil Eng Infrastruct J (CEIJ) 51(1):35–54.  https://doi.org/10.7508/ceij.2018.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jamshidi Chenari R, Kamyab Farahbakhsh H, Heidarie Golafzani S, Eslami A (2018b) Non-stationary realisation of CPT data: considering lithological and inherent heterogeneity. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2018.1447675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jiang SH, Li DQ, Zhang LM, Zhou CB (2014) Slope reliability analysis considering spatially variable shear strength parameters using a non-intrusive stochastic finite element method. Eng Geol 168:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laccase S, Nadim F (1996) Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties. In: Shackleford CD, Nelson PP, Roth MJS (eds) Uncertainty in the geologic environment: from theory to practice. ASCE geotechnical special publication no 58. ASCE, New York, pp 49–75Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee IK, White W, Ingles OG (1983) Geotechnical engineering. Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li DQ, Qi XH, Phoon KK, Zhang LM, Zhou CB (2013) Effect of spatially variable shear strength parameters with linearly increasing mean trend on reliability of infinite slopes. Struct Saf 49:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lumb P (1970) Safety factors and the probability distribution of soil strength. Can Geotech J 7:225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lumb P (1974) Application of statistics in soil mechanics. In: Lee I (ed) Soil mechanics: new horizons. Butterworth and Company Publishers Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Merifield RS, Sloan SW, Yu HS (1999) Rigorous plasticity solutions for the bearing capacity of two-layered clays. Geotechnique 49(4):471–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36:612–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Popescu R, Deodatis G, Nobahar A (2005) Effects of random heterogeneity of soil properties on bearing capacity. Prob Eng Mech 20:324–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Popescu R, Prevost JH, Deodatis G (1997) Effects of spatial variability on soil liquefaction: some design recommendations. Geotechnique 47:1019–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2002) Numerical recipes in C ++: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ranjbar Pouya K, Zhalejoo N, Jamshidi Chenari R (2014) Influence of random heterogeneity of cross-correlated strength parameters on bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Indian Geotech J 54(4):427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scheiding F, Kogler F (1938) The fundamental action of earth pressure cells. J Mech Phys Solids 2:141–155Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sivakumar Babu GL, Mukesh MD (2004) Effect of soil variability on reliability of soil slopes. Geotechnique 54:335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Skempton AW (1948) A study of the geotechnical properties of some post-glacial clays. Geotechnique 1:7–22Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Srivastava A, Sivakumar Babu GL (2009) Effects of soil variability on the bearing capacity of clay and in slope stability problems. Eng Geol 108:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhalehjoo N, Jamshidi Chenari R, Ranjbar Pouya K (2012) Evaluation of bearing capacity of shallow foundations using random field theory in comparison to classic methods. In: Proceedings of GeoCongress 2012: state of the art and practice in geotechnical engineering, Oakland, pp 2971–2980Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of GuilanRashtIran

Personalised recommendations