Advertisement

Site characterization for deep excavation and evaluation of stiffness properties of backfilled soil from field instrumentation

  • G. PadmanabhanEmail author
  • G. Sasikala
  • A. Ravisankar
Practice-oriented Paper
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

This paper highlights the importance of site characterization for predicting deep excavation behaviour and usefulness of field instrumentation in evaluating stiffness properties of backfilled soil through analysing a deep excavation carried out at a nuclear facility site located along East Cost of India. The field-monitored data along with finite element software were employed to predict the behaviour of soil during deep excavation. A series of back-calculations were performed in finite element software by varying stiffness properties, using different soil models, and displacements obtained were compared with those obtained from filed. This coupled analysis provided an insight into in situ stiffness properties of backfilled soil, which can be used for analysing and optimizing future excavations in backfilled soil as part of infrastructure development and expansion of facilities.

Keywords

Deep excavation Constitutive laws Stiffness of soil Field instrumentation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. A. Boominathan, Professor, IITM, Chennai, for his guidance on carrying out this work and are thankful to IITM, Chennai, for allowing to use the infrastructure available at IITM for carrying out this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Clough GW, O’Rourke TD (1990) Construction induced movements of in situ walls. In: Proceedings of the ASCE conference on design and performance of earth retaining structures. Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 25, ASCE, NY, pp 439–470Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clough GW, Smith EW, Sweeney BP (1989) Movement control of excavation support system by iterative design. In: Foundation engineering current principles and practices, vol 2. ASCE, New York, NY, pp 869–882Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldberg DT, Jaworski WE, Gordon MD (1976) Lateral support systems and underpinning. Design and construction, Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA RD-75-128, vol 1Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil mechanics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ou CY, Hsieh PG, Chiou DC (1993) Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation. Can Geotech J 30:758–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ou CY, Hsiesh PG (2000) Prediction of Ground surface settlement induced by deep excavation, geotechnical research Report No GT200008, Department of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ou CY, Liao JT, Cheng WL (2000) Building response and ground movements induced by a deep excavation. Geotechnique 50(3):209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Rourke TD (1981) Ground movements caused by braced excavations. J Geotech Eng Div Am Soc Civ Eng 107(GT9):1159–1178Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peck RB (1969) Deep excavation and tunnelling in soft ground, State of art report. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Mexico City, pp 225–290Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Becker P (2013) Importance of observational method in view of numerical analysis for retaining structures in soft soils. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, 28. http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/7icchge/session01/28. Accessed 17 Aug 2017
  11. 11.
    Hsiung BCB, Dao SD (2015) Impacts from three-dimensional effect on the wall deflection induced by a deep excavation in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Jps Geotech Soc Spec Publ 2:1602–1607.  https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.TWN-15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsiung BCB et al (2016) Three dimensional effects of a deep excavation on wall deflections in loose to medium dense sands. Comput Geotech 80:138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorska K, Wyjadlowski M (2012) Analysis of displacement of excavation based on inclinometer measurements. Stud Geotech Mech.  https://doi.org/10.5277/sgm041201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nikolinakou MA et al (2011) Prediction and interpretation of the performance of a deep excavation in Berlin sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whittle AJ et al (2015) Prediction and performance of deep excavations for Courthouse station, Boston. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(4):04014123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boominathan A (2004) Seismic site characterization for nuclear structures and power plants. Curr Sci 87(10):1388–1397Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sivakumar C, Elango L (2008) Assessment of water quality in Kalpakkam Region, Tamilnadu. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 7(4):687–691Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ou CY (1994) Finite-element analysis of deep excavation in layered sandy and clayey soil deposits. Can Geotech J 31(2):204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoo C, Lee D (2008) Deep excavation induced ground surface movement characteristics—a numerical investigation. Comput Gotech 35:231–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsiung BCB (2009) A case study on the behaviour of a deep excavation in sand. Comput Geotech 36:665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hsieh PG(1999) Prediction of ground movements caused by deep excavation in clay. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of construction engineering, National Taiwan University of science and Technology, Taiwan, ROCGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khoiri M, Ou CY (2013) Evaluation of deformation parameter for deep excavation in sand through case histories. Comput Geotech 47:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parkbaz MS et al (2013) Characteristics of diaphragm wall lateral deformations and ground surface settlements: case study in Iran-Ahwaz metro. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 35:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Usmani A et al. (2010) Analysis of braced excavation using hardening soil model. In: Indian geotechnical conference 2010, GEO trendz, 16–18 Dec 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brinkgreve RBJ, Vermeer PA (1992) On the use of cam-clay models. In: GN Pande, S Pietruszczak (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on numerical models in geomechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 557–565Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bowles JE (1998) Foundation analysis and design, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kulhawy FH, Mayne P (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design, EPRI final reportGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Menard L, Broise Y (1975) Theoretical and practical aspects of dynamic consolidation. Geotechnique 25(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baguelin F, Jézéquel JF, Shields DH (1978) The pressuremeter and foundation engineering. Trans Tech Publications, Pennsylvania State University, State CollegeGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Timoshenko S, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indira Gandhi Center for Atomic Research (IGCAR)KalpakkamIndia
  2. 2.Homi Bhabha National InstituteMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Material Mechanics SectionIGCARKalpakkamIndia
  4. 4.Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Facility (FRFCF)IGCARKalpakkamIndia

Personalised recommendations