Advertisement

Dynamic behaviour of granular soil materials mixed with granulated rubber: influence of rubber content and mean grain size ratio on shear modulus and damping ratio for a wide strain range

  • G. A. PistolasEmail author
  • A. Anastasiadis
  • K. Pitilakis
Technical Paper
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

The escalating disposal of end-life tires has led to an urgent need for efficient reuse. The positive environmental impact of the application of this material in large-scale civil engineer construction, such as soil-retaining structures, or as seismic isolation technique, stems not only from the reuse of the tires, but also from the effect this material inherits to the response of these structures. The soil material properties in the form of shear modulus and damping degradation curves, GγD, are key parameters in the numerical analysis of site-specific seismic response and seismic design of structures. To this end, the effect of the dynamic shear strain, γ, on the shear modulus, G, and damping ratio, D, of granular soils mixed with granulated rubber is studied. An experimental approach is presented, employing resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests to obtain an insight on the response of these mixtures in a wide band of dynamic strain. A range of rubber content in the mixture up to 60% per weight is tested, and the influence of the mean grain size ratio of the mixed materials is investigated.

Keywords

Granulated rubber Damping ratio Shear modulus Cyclic triaxial Resonant column 

References

  1. 1.
    Edil T (2004) A review of mechanical and chemical properties of shredded tires and soil mixtures. In: Recycled materials in geotechnics. Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE, vol 127, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edil T, Bosscher P (1994) Engineering properties of tire chips and soil mixtures. Geotechn Test J 17(4):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K, Souli A (2012) Dynamic behavior of sand/rubber mixtures. Part II: Effect of rubber content on G/G0-γ-DT curves and volumetric threshold strain. J ASTM Int 9(2). www.astm.org CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anastasiadis A, Senetakis K, Pitilakis K, Gargala C, Karakasi I (2012) Dynamic behavior of sand/rubber mixtures. Part I: Effect of rubber content and duration of confinement on small-strain shear modulus and damping ratio. J ASTM Int 9(2). www.astm.org CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K, Senetakis K (2009) Dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio curves of sand/rubber mixtures. In: Proceedings of XVIIth international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng Z, Sutter KG (2000) Dynamic properties of granulated rubber/sand mixtures. Geotech Test J GTJODJ 23(3):338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pistolas A, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2015) Dynamic modulus and damping of gravel-recycled rubber mixtures: resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests. In: Proceedings of the XVI ECSMGE, September 2015, Edinburgh, pp 2613–2618Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2012) Dynamic properties of dry sand/rubber (SRM) and gravel/rubber (GRM) mixtures in a wide range of shearing strain amplitudes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 33:38–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Masad E, Taha R, Ho C, Papagiannakis T (1996) Engineering properties of tire/soil mixtures as a lightweight fill material. Geotech Test J GTJODJ 19(3):297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zornberg JG, Carbal AR, Viratjandr C (2004) Behaviour of tire shred-sand mixtures. Can Geotech J 41:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Venkatappa Rao G, Dutta RK (2006) Compressibility and strength behaviour of sand–tyre chip mixtures. Geotechn Geol Eng 24:711–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakhaei A, Marandi SM, SaniKermani S, Bagheripour MH (2012) Dynamic properties of granular soils mixed with granulated rubber. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 43:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pistolas GA, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2014) Cyclic undrained mechanical properties of sand/granulated rubber mixtures. In: Proceedings of the 7th national conference on geotechnical mechanics, AthensGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ehsani M, Shariatmadari N, Mirhosseini SM (2015) Shear modulus and damping ratio of sand-granulated rubber mixtures. J Central South Univ 22(8):3159–3167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pistolas GA, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2017) Dynamic behaviour of granular soil materials mixed with granulated rubber: effect of rubber content and granularity on the small-strain shear modulus and damping ratio. Geotech Geol Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0391-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brara A, Brara A, Daouadji A, Bali A, Daya EM (2016) Dynamic properties of dense sand-rubber mixtures with small particles size ratio. Eur J Environ Civ Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1139509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foose GJ, Benson CH, Bosscher PJ (1996) Sand reinforced with shredded waste tires. J Geotech Eng 122(9):760–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edeskar T (2006) Use of tyre shreds in civil engineering applications—technical and environmental properties. PhD Dissertation, Lulea University of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Division of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Humphrey D, Manion W (1992) Properties of tire chips for lightweight fill. Grouting Soil Improv Geosynth 2:1344–1355Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hazarika H, Otani J, Kikuchi Y (2012) Evaluation of tyre products as ground improving geomaterials. Ground Improv 165(GI4):267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marto A, Latifi N, Moradi R, Oghabi M, Zolfeghari SY (2013) Shear properties of sand-tire chips mixtures. Electron J Geotech Eng 18B:325–334Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohamad ET, Latifi N, Marto A, Moradim R, Abad SVANK (2013) Effects of relative density on shear strength characteristics of sand-tire chips mixture. Electron J Geotech Eng 18D:623–632Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xiong W, Tsang H-H, Lo SH, Shang S, Wang H, Zhou F (2011) Geotechnical seismic isolation system: experimental study. Adv Mater Res 163–167:4449–4453Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim H-K, Santamarina JC (2008) Sand-rubber mixtures (large rubber chips). Can Geotech J 45:1457–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Promputthangkoon P, Hyde AFL (2007) Compressibility and liquefaction potential of rubber composite soils. In: Hazarika, Yasuhara (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on scrap tire derived geomaterials—opportunities and challenges, Yokosuka, Japan, pp 161–170Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hyodo M, Yamada S, Orense RP, Okamoto M (2007) Undrained cyclic shear properties of tire chip-sand mixtures. In: Hazarika, Yasuhara (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on scrap tire derived geomaterials—opportunities and challenges, Yokosuka, Japan, pp 187–196Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mashiri MS, Vinod JS, Sheikh MN (2016) Liquefaction potential and dynamic properties of sand-tyre chip (STCh) mixtures. Geotech Test J 39(1):69–79.  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li B, Huang M, Zeng X (2016) Dynamic behavior and liquefaction analysis of recycled-rubber sand mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee J, Salgado R, Bernal A, Lovell C (1999) Shredded tires and rubber-sand as lightweight backfill. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 125(2):132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hazarika H, Yasuhara K, Karmokar AK, Mitarai Y (2007) Shaking table test on liquefaction prevention using tire chips and sand mixture. In: Hazarika, Yasuhara (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on scrap tire derived geomaterials—opportunities and challenges, Yokosuka, pp 215–222Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hazarika H, Kohama E, Sugano T (2008) Underwater shaking table tests on waterfront structures protected with tire chips cushion. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134(12):1706–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Edinçliler A (2008) Using waste tire-soil mixtures for embankment construction. In: Hazarika H, Yasuhara K (eds) Scrap tire derived geomaterials—opportunities and challenges. Taylor & Francis Group, London. ISBN 978-0-415-46070-5Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Uchimura T, Anh Chi N, Nirmalan S, Sato T, Meidani M, Towhata I (2007) Shaking table tests on effect of tire chips and sand mixture in increasing liquefaction resistance and mitigating uplift of pipe. In: Hazarika, Yasuhara (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on scrap tire derived geomaterials—opportunities and challenges, Yokosuka, Japan, pp 179–186Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kaneda K, Hazarika H, Yamazaki H (2011) Mechanism of earth pressure reduction using tire chips in sand backfill. In: 14th Asian regional conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Hong-Kong, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tsang HH, Sheikh MN, Lo SH, Lam NTK (2008) QUSHION: earthquake protection by rubber-soil mixtures. In: 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pistolas GA (2015) Experimental and numerical investigation of the implementation of recycled materials mixtures in the foundation of structures for the improvement of seismic behaviour. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (in Greek) Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brunet S, de la Llera JC, Kausel E (2016) Non-linear modeling of seismic isolation systems made of recycled tire-rubber. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 85:134–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kaneko T, Orense RP, Hyodo M, Yoshimoto N (2013) Seismic response characteristics of saturated sand deposits mixed with tire chips. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(4):633–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hadad H, Calabrese A, Strano S, Serino G (2017) A base isolation system for developing countries using discarded tyres filled with elastomeric recycled materials. J Earthq Eng 21(2):246–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    ASTM (2000) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system): D2487-00. Annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Drnevich V (1967) Effects of strain history on the dynamic properties of sand. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    ASTM (2015) ASTM D4015-15 “Standard test methods for modulus and damping of soils by fixed-base resonant column devices”. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    ASTM (2011) ASTM D3999/D3999M-11e1, “Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus”. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pistolas GA, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2014) Mechanical shear strength properties of sand/granulated rubber mixtures. In: Proceedings of the 7th national conference on geotechnical mechanics, AthensGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    ASTM (20121) ASTM D7181-11 (2011) Method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken. www.astm.org
  46. 46.
    Menq FY (2003) Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Darendeli M (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stokoe K, Darendeli M, Gilbert R, Menq F-Y, Choi W-K (2004) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. In: Proceedings NSF/PEER international workshop on uncertainties in nonlinear soil properties and their impact on modeling dynamic soil response, University of California at Berkley, BerkleyGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Saxena S, Reddy K (1989) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for Monterey No. 0 sand by resonant column tests. Soils Found Jpn Soc Soil Mech Found Eng 29(2):37–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Pistolas
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Anastasiadis
    • 1
  • K. Pitilakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Foundations and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Department of Civil EngineeringAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations