Advertisement

Evaluation of recycled concrete aggregate in asphalt mixes

  • D. El-Tahan
  • A. Gabr
  • S. El-BadawyEmail author
  • M. Shetawy
Technical Paper
  • 461 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the feasibility of using recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) as a replacement to the natural aggregates (NAs) in hot mix asphalt (HMA). RCA was collected from two different sources (new concrete cubes used for quality control testing during construction, and old demolished building) to investigate the impact of material degeneration on the engineering properties of the mix. Basic engineering properties were determined for both RCA and bitumen for the preparation of HMA mixes. Different mix designs were conducted using the conventional Marshall method with 100% RCA or substituting the coarse natural aggregates (retained on the US Standard Sieve No. 4) by RCA. Performance of the investigated mixes in terms of stability, flow, loss in abrasion, loss of stability, and indirect tensile strength was evaluated. Moreover, the investigated mixes were characterized by the image processing and analysis system (IPAS) software to investigate the aggregates characteristics such as contact zone properties, orientation, and segregation. Results showed that the new RCA coarse aggregate had lower bulk specific gravity, higher liquid limit with no plasticity, higher pH values and lower Los Angeles Abrasion values compared with the old RCA. Also, new and old RCA showed higher water absorption than the specification maximum limits, which had a significant effect on the optimum bitumen content. Using of the 100% new RCA, increased the stability, and flow compared with other mixes. In terms of abrasion loss, loss of stability and indirect tensile strength, all results were within the specification limits. Required fracture energy was lower for the 100% new RCA. The results of the IPAS software showed that the HMAs containing new RCA yielded the best performance in terms of aggregate-to-aggregate contact zone properties, resistance to permanent deformation, and less stress concentrations in comparison with those of other mixes, old RCA, new RCA/NA, and old RCA/NA, respectively.

Keywords

Recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) Natural aggregate (NA) Hot mix asphalt (HMA) Marshall IPAS 

References

  1. 1.
    Aatheesan TB, Arulrajah A, Bo MW, Vuong B, Wilson J (2010) Crushed brick blends with crushed rock for pavement systems. In: proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-waste and resource management (vol. 163, no. 1, pp 29–35). Thomas Telford Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arisha A, Gabr A, El-Badawy S, Shwally S (2016) Using blends of construction and demolition waste materials and recycled clay masonry brick in pavement. Proced Eng 143:1317–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arisha A, Gabr A, El-Badawy S, Shwally S (2018) Performance evaluation of construction and demolition waste materials for pavement construction in Egypt. ASCE’s J Mater Civ Eng 30(2).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arulrajah A, Piratheepan J, Disfani MM, Bo MW (2012) Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications. J Mater Civ Eng 25(8):1077–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    EEAA (Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency) (2015) Egypt state of environment report. Ministry of Environment, Cairo (in Arabic) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Badawy SM, Gabr AR, Abdel Hakim RT (2018) Recycled materials and by-products for pavement construction. In: Martínez LMT, Kharissova OV, Kharisov BI (eds) Handbook of ecomaterials. Springer, New York, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gabr AR, Cameron DA (2012) Properties of recycled concrete aggregate for unbound pavement construction. J Mater Civ Eng 24(6):754–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jimenez JR, Ayuso J, Agrela F, López M, Galvín AP (2012) Utilisation of unbound recycled aggregates from selected CDW in unpaved rural roads. Resour Conserv Recycl 58:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Behiry AEAEM (2013) Utilization of cement treated recycled concrete aggregates as base or subbase layer in Egypt. Ain Shams Eng J 4(4):661–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennert T, Papp W Jr, Maher A, Gucunski N (2000) Utilization of construction and demolition debris under traffic-type loading in base and subbase applications. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1714:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohammadinia A, Arulrajah A, Sanjayan J, Disfani MM, Bo MW, Darmawan S (2014) Laboratory evaluation of the use of cement-treated construction and demolition materials in pavement base and subbase applications. J Mater Civ Eng 27(6):04014186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park T (2003) Application of construction and building debris as base and subbase materials in rigid pavement. J Transp Eng 129(5):558–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poon CS, Chan D (2006) Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base. Constr Build Mater 20(8):578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Brito J, Saikia N (2012) Recycled aggregate in concrete: use of industrial, construction and demolition waste. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hiller JE, Deshpande YS, Qin Y, Shorkey CJ, Peterson K (2011) Efficient use of recycled concrete in transportation infrastructure (No. RC-1544). Michigan Technological UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA) (2009) Recycling concrete pavement. Concrete Paving Technology, EB-043PGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parekh DN, Modhera CD (2011) Characterization of recycled aggregate concrete. Int J Adv Eng Technol 2(4):321–330Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Bayati HKA, Tighe SL, Achebe J (2018) Influence of recycled concrete aggregate on volumetric properties of hot mix asphalt. Resour Conserv Recycl 130:200–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pérez I, Pasandín AR (2017) Moisture damage resistance of hot-mix asphalt made with recycled concrete aggregates and crumb rubber. J Clean Prod 165:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pasandín AR, Pérez I (2017) Fatigue performance of bituminous mixtures made with recycled concrete aggregates and waste tire rubber. Constr Build Mater 157:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Radević A, Đureković A, Zakić D, Mladenović G (2017) Effects of recycled concrete aggregate on stiffness and rutting resistance of asphalt concrete. Constr Build Mater 136:386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Razzaq AK (2016) Possibility of utilizing recycled concrete aggregates in HMA mixture. Kufa J Eng 7(3):96–109Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fatemi S, Imaninasab R (2016) Performance evaluation of recycled asphalt mixtures by construction and demolition waste materials. Constr Build Mater 120:450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Motter JS, Miranda LFR, Bernucci LLB (2015) Performance of hot mix asphalt concrete produced with coarse recycled concrete aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 27(11):04015030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gul WA, Guler M (2014) Rutting susceptibility of asphalt concrete with recycled concrete aggregate using revised Marshall procedure. Constr Build Mater 55:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pasandín AR, Pérez I (2013) Laboratory evaluation of hot-mix asphalt containing construction and demolition waste. Constr Build Mater 43:497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arabani M, Moghadas Nejad F, Azarhoosh AR (2013) Laboratory evaluation of recycled waste concrete into asphalt mixtures. Int J Pavement Eng 14(6):531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arabani M, Azarhoosh AR (2012) The effect of recycled concrete aggregate and steel slag on the dynamic properties of asphalt mixtures. Constr Build Mater 35:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mills-Beale J, You Z (2010) The mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures with recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 24(3):230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rafi MM, Qadir A, Siddiqui SH (2011) Experimental testing of hot mix asphalt mixture made of recycled aggregates. Waste Manage Res 29(12):1316–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhusal S, Li X, Wen H (2011) Evaluation of effects of recycled concrete aggregate on volumetrics of hot-mix asphalt. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2205:36–39.  https://doi.org/10.3141/2205-05 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Topal A, Ozturk AU, Baradan B (2006) Use of recycled concrete aggregates in hot-mix asphalt. Special publication in the American Concrete Institute (ACI) No. SP235-20, vol 235, pp 291–304Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Coenen AR (2011) Image analysis of aggregate structure parameters as performance indicators of rutting resistance. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sefidmazgi NR (2011) Defining effective aggregate skeleton in asphalt mixture using digital imaging. University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    ECP (Egyptian Code of Practice) (2008) Egyptian code of practice for urban and rural roads, edition 1: road materials and their tests (part four). Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities, CairoGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    AASHTO T96 (2002) Resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    AASHTO T180 (2017) Standard Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using A 4.54-kg (10-LB) Rammer and A 457-mm (18-in.) Drop. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    AASHTO T27 (2014) Sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    AASHTO T84 (2013) Standard method of test for specific gravity and absorption of fine Aggregate. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    AASHTO T85-04 (2014) Standard method of test for specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    AASHTO T90 (2016) Determining the plastic limit and plasticity index of soils. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, AASHTO Standards, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    AASHTO T89 (2013) Determining the liquid limit of soils. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, AASHTO Standards, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    AASHTO T 289-91 (2008) Determining pH of soil for use in corrosion testing. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    AASHTO T49 (2015) Standard method of test for penetration of bituminous materials. AASHTO Standards, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    AASHTO T316 (2013) Viscosity determination of asphalt binder using rotational viscometer. AASHTO Standards, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    AASHTO T53 (2009) Standard method of test for softening point of bitumen (ring-and-ball apparatus). AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    AASHTO T245 (2015) Standard method of test for resistance to plastic flow of bituminous mixtures using Marshall apparatus. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lee CH, Du JC, Shen DH (2012) Evaluation of pre-coated recycled concrete aggregate for hot mix asphalt. Constr Build Mater 28(1):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    AASHTO T209 (2012) Standard method of test for theoretical max specific gravity and density of hot mix asphalt paving mixtures. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    AASHTO TP 108-141 (2015) Standard method of test for Abrasion loss of asphalt mixture specimens. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kandhal PS (2002) Design, construction and maintenance of open-graded asphalt friction courses. National Asphalt Pavement Association Information Series 115, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    AASHTO T-283 (2014) Standard method of test for resistance of compacted bituminous mixture against to moisture induced damage. AASHTO Standards, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Roque R, Zhang Z, Sankar B (1999) Determination of crack growth rate parameters of asphalt mixtures using the superpave IDT. Annual Meeting of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang Z, Roque R, Birgisson B (2001) Evaluation of laboratory-measured crack growth rate for asphalt mixtures. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1767:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Coenen AR, Kutay ME, Sefidmazgi NR, Bahia HU (2012) Aggregate structure characterisation of asphalt mixtures using two-dimensional image analysis. Road Mater Pavement Des 13(3):433–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. El-Tahan
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Gabr
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. El-Badawy
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Shetawy
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Works Engineering Dept., Faculty of EngineeringMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  2. 2.Civil Engineering Dept.Higher Institute of Engineering and TechnologyNew DamiettaEgypt

Personalised recommendations