Choosing proper fluorescent dyes, proteins, and imaging techniques to study mitochondrial dynamics in mammalian cells

Open Access
Review

Abstract

Mitochondrial dynamics refers to the processes maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis, including mitochondrial fission, fusion, transport, biogenesis, and mitophagy. Mitochondrial dynamics is essential for maintaining the metabolic function of mitochondria as well as their regulatory roles in cell signaling. In this review, we summarize the recently developed imaging techniques for studying mitochondrial dynamics including: mitochondrial-targeted fluorescent proteins and dyes, live-cell imaging using photoactivation, photoswitching and cell fusion, mitochondrial transcription and replication imaging by in situ hybridization, and imaging mitochondrial dynamics by super-resolution microscopy. Moreover, we discuss examples of how to choose and combine proper fluorescent dyes and/or proteins.

Keywords

Imaging Photoactivation Photoswitching Mitochondrial dynamics Super-resolution microscope 

Introduction

The dynamic properties of mitochondria (mitochondrial fission, fusion, transport, biogenesis, and degradation) are critical for maintaining electron transfer chain function and electrical connectivity of mitochondria, preventing build-up of damaged proteins, protecting mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) integrity, controlling mitochondrial turnover, and regulating many signaling pathways (McBride et al. 2006; Detmer and Chan 2007; Tatsuta and Langer 2008; Liu et al. 2009; Youle and van der Bliek 2012; Liesa and Shirihai 2013; Friedman and Nunnari 2014). Mitochondria continually exchange contents including proteins, mitochondrial RNA (mtRNA), and mtDNA through mitochondrial fusion. Mitochondrial fusion–fission dynamics, transport, and biogenesis/mitophagy also determine mitochondrial morphology, position, and amount. Mitochondria have distinctive features including their own genome, two layers of membranes, and the existence of inner membrane potential, which determine the unique features of mitochondrial dynamics including sequential fusion of two layers of mitochondrial membranes and selective fusion controlled by mitochondrial membrane potential. These features make mitochondrial imaging different from many other organelles.

Fluorescent sensors have attracted considerable attention in mitochondrial dynamics as they enable real-time monitoring and imaging of sub-cellular structures. Improvements in microscopy and the development of mitochondria-specific imaging techniques have greatly advanced the study of mitochondrial dynamics. For example, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) studies have been developed to understand mitochondrial dynamics (Mitra and Lippincott-Schwartz 2010). Several studies have investigated mitochondrial dynamics in plants (Logan and Leaver 2000; Matsushima et al. 2008; Ekanayake et al. 2015); here, we will highlight the ongoing research into mitochondrial dynamics in mammalian cells. We summarize the recently developed imaging techniques and discuss examples of how to properly choose and combine fluorescent dyes and/or proteins.

Mitochondria-Specific Fluorescent Proteins and Dyes

Mitochondrial-targeted fluorescent proteins (FPs) have been widely used. Specific localization is achieved by fusing the FP gene to the mitochondrial targeting sequence of an endogenous protein. The targeting sequence of cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIII, which localizes in the mitochondrial matrix, is the most widely used one. According the demands of experiments, one can choose different mitochondrial targeting sequences using software prediction algorithms (Fukasawa et al. 2015; Martelli et al. 2015). Several effective targeting sequences have also been found for the outer surface of the outer membrane, based on AKAP1, OMP25, and TOM70(Huang et al. 1999; Suzuki et al. 2002; Malka et al. 2005), and the outer surface of the inner membrane using the Cox8a subunit of complex IV(Wilkens et al. 2013).

Fluorescent dyes have also been used to mark mitochondria. Several fluorescent probes including Rhodamine 123 (R123), tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM), and JC-1 can be used to monitor mitochondrial membrane potential (\(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\)) in various cell types (Joshi and Bakowska 2011), making them suitable for marking functional mitochondria. TMRM did not suppress respiration when it was used at low concentrations, making it a good and popular choice for marking functional mitochondria (Scaduto and Grotyohann 1999). The membrane-permeant JC-1 dye exhibits potential-dependent accumulation in mitochondria, indicated by a fluorescence emission shift from green (~529 nm) to red (~590 nm). Due to the spectral overlap with red- and green-fluorescent dyes and proteins, it is difficult to use JC-1 in a multi-parameter measurement. TMRM and mtGFP can be combined to study high and low \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\) of mitochondria in cells under normal and stress conditions (Twig et al. 2008). However, these \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\) sensors are not optimal for marking mitochondrial morphology since they are easily washed out of cells once the mitochondria experience a loss in \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\). They are also unsuitable for experiments that require cells to be treated with aldehyde fixatives or with other agents that affect the metabolic state of the mitochondria. MitoTracker® probes including MitoTracker Green and MitoTracker Red are fixable probes that are not dependent on \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\) (Chazotte 2011). Although they cannot be used to study \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\), they are good markers for mitochondrial morphology.

To overcome some of the deficiencies in the above-mentioned stains, including poor photostability and cytotoxicity, new alternatives have recently been developed, including NPA-TPP (Huang et al. 2015b) and Splendor (Carvalho et al. 2014), which not only have high specificity to mitochondria, but also exhibit high photostability, negligible cytotoxicity, good water solubility, better fluorescence intensity (FI), and chemical stability in living cells. The extraordinarily high photostability of NPA-TPP is attributed to its extremely stable structure owing to the high π-conjugated macrocycle and strong fluorescent response (Huang et al. 2015a), and Splendor is selected from a series of new rationally designed 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BTD) fluorescent derivatives with excellent fluorescence intensity and almost no background signal (Carvalho et al. 2014). Another probe, named MitoBADY, can be also used to visualize mitochondria in living cells by Raman microscopy (Yamakoshi et al. 2015). These stains showed great potential for marking mitochondria and enable real-time and long-term tracking mitochondrial dynamics. The properties and applications of these dyes are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

The properties and applications of mitochondria-specific dyes

Fluorescent dyes

Properties

Applications

Rhodamine 123

Negligible cytotoxicity and potential-sensitive

Measure \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\) and mark functional mitochondria

JC-1

Dual-emission and potential-sensitive

Measure \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\)

TMRM/TMRE

Potential-sensitive

Measure \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\), mark functional mitochondria and image time-dependent \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\)

MitoTracker® probes

Fixable

Mark mitochondria

NPA-TPP

High photostability, negligible cytotoxicity, and good water solubility

Long-term tracking

Splendor

Excellent fluorescence intensity and negligible background signal

Long-term tracking

MitoBADY

High sensitivity and specificity

Long-term tracking

Visualizing Mitochondrial Dynamics by Live-Cell Imaging

Photoactivation

Photoactivatable fluorescent proteins including PAGFP (Patterson and Lippincott-Schwartz 2002), Kindling fluorescent protein (KFP) (Chudakov et al. 2003), and photoactivatable mCherry (PAmCherry) (Subach et al. 2009) are widely used to visualize mitochondrial dynamics (Fig. 1). Using a microscope system with region-of-interest illumination capability, it is possible to mark a subset of mitochondria within a cell. Real-time imaging of photoactivatable fluorescent proteins has allowed the visualization of mitochondrial fusion by time-lapse imaging (Karbowski et al. 2014). Studies of the fusion dynamics of different mitochondrial sub-compartments, inner membrane (IMM), outer membrane (OMM), and inter-membrane space (IMS) have been achieved by fusing the photoactivatable FPs to the appropriate targeting signals or proteins. Single-molecule tracking in mitochondria was used to study mitochondrial dynamics including the diffusion or movement of mitochondrial membrane proteins. However, its application is limited (Kuzmenko et al. 2011; Appelhans et al. 2012). In most cases, a combination of one photoactivatable FP and an ordinary FP of another color is used to divide the mitochondria to two classes.
Fig. 1

The combination of mtPAGFP photoactivation with mtDsRed bleaching. PAGPF can be photoactivated by UV-light from a non-fluorescent to a green-fluorescent state. Mitochondria expressing mtPAGFP and mtDsRed are marked in red and the nucleus is marked in blue in this figure. After small region photoactivation, mitochondria in the photoactivated region are labeled as yellow due to the overlapping of red and green. The combination of mtPAGFP photoactivation with mtDsRed bleaching by 543 nm laser can mark the photoactivated mitochondria with single green fluorescence. When the non-photoactivated mitochondria labeled as red fuse with yellow mitochondria or green mitochondria, the color of both mitochondria become yellow for the acquirement of GFP fluorescence

Photoactivatable FPs exhibit weak fluorescence before photoactivation and strong fluorescence after photoactivation. Mitochondrial fusion can be determined by the transfer of photoactivated FP from a subset of mitochondria throughout the mitochondrial network. For instance, the cyan-photoactivated, green-fluorescent PAGFP (mtPAGFP) can be combined with mtRFP or mtDsRed to visualize the exchange of matrix contents between individual mitochondria in real time (Fig. 1). Using high-resolution confocal imaging with region-of-interest scanning, an irreversible photoactivation within the mitochondria is achieved by illumination with a pulse of UV-light (Patterson and Lippincott-Schwartz 2002). As the result of fusion, activated mtPAGFP molecules transfer to unlabeled mitochondria, also leading to a decrease in PAGFP FI of the mitochondria containing activated mtPAGFP. The combination of mitochondrial matrix-targeted, green-photoactivated, red-fluorescent KFP (mtKFP), and green or yellow fluorescent protein (mtGFP, mtYFP) may also be used to study mitochondrial dynamics (Liu et al. 2009), though the newer PAmCherry has faster maturation, better pH stability, faster photoactivation, higher photoactivation contrast, and better photostability (Subach et al. 2009).

The bleaching of one FP can be combined with the photoactivation of another to improve the visibility of fusion, for instance, using the combination described above of PAGFP and DsRed. Using two-photon excitation for photoactivation at ~750 nm effectively simultaneously bleaches DsRed and photoactivates PAGFP. Alternatively, high intensity from the green, DsRed excitation laser (typically 543 or 561 nm) can be used simultaneously with UV illumination to achieve the photoactivation/bleaching effect, which is illustrated in Fig. 1. This technique has helped show that transfer of matrix contents during mitochondrial fusion is un-directed, i.e. occurs by passive diffusion (Liu et al. 2009).

Combined photoactivation and bleaching is also used to study the transfer of mitochondrial proteins of the IMM, OMM, IMS, and matrix and of nucleoids between mitochondria, the targeted compartment can be marked with red fluorescence in combination with mtPAGFP, or alternatively PAGFP targeted to the sub-compartment of interest can be combined with mtDsRed. In the former case, mitochondrial fusion events can be recognized by the change of PAGFP FI, and the transfer of targeted proteins can be studied by observing the red fluorescence signal among the two mitochondria undergoing mitochondrial fusion. For instance, Tfam-DsRed marking mtDNA and mtPAGFP were combined to show the transfer of mtDNA nucleoids among mitochondria (Yang et al. 2015). Also, TMRM measurements of \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\) and mtPAGFP were combined to show that mitochondria with lower \(\Delta \varPsi {}_{\text{m}}\) are less likely to undergo fusion (Twig et al. 2008).

The rate at which the activated mtPAGFP molecules equilibrate across the entire mitochondrial population is used as a measure of fusion activity. In most cases, measurements were performed using a single-cell time-lapse approach, quantifying the equilibration in one cell over a certain time period. Another approach is to use a programmable, motorized stage to alternate among fields and collect multiple cells simultaneously at lower temporal resolution for each cell. This provides a significant increase in the number of cells that can be acquired, but sacrifices the ability to resolve individual fusion events, while maintaining the highly resolved sub-cellular quantification (Lovy et al. 2012).

Photoactivatable fluorescent proteins have also been used to study the fate of mitochondria as they age in cells. First, mtPAGFP was expressed in stem cells. After exposure to a pulse of UV-light, mtPAGFP continued to be synthesized. Subsequently, cells accumulated unlabeled ‘young’ mitochondria which could be distinguished from the ‘old’ ones by different PAGFP FI. By following the fates of old and young organelles during the division of human mammary stem-like cells, it was shown that cells apportion the mitochondria asymmetrically between daughter cells according to age (Katajisto et al. 2015).

Photoswitching

Photoswitching fluorescent proteins, which change color upon selective illumination, including Kaede (Ando et al. 2002; Owens and Edelman 2015), Dendra2 (Pham et al. 2012) and Eos (Wiedenmann et al. 2004) have also been used to visualize mitochondrial dynamics. Similar to the experiments described for monitoring mitochondrial fusion by photoactivation, a subset of mitochondria may be irreversibly photoswitched from green to red emitting by targeted illumination of labeled organelles; however, expression of only one protein is required. These color-changing properties provide a simple and powerful technique for regional optical marking (Ando et al. 2002). Mitochondrial-targeted Kaede (MitoKaede) has been used to study mitochondrial dynamics (Owens and Edelman 2015), in the manner illustrated in Fig. 2. MitoKaede was also used to observe mitochondrial dynamics within neuronal processes to show that there is a widespread exchange of mitochondrial components throughout a neuron as a result of organelle fusion (Owens and Walcott 2012). A mouse line expressing mitochondrial Dendra2 (mito-Dendra2) has been generated to study mitochondrial dynamics in primary tissue (Pham et al. 2012).
Fig. 2

Photoswitching of MitoKaede. Mitochondria expressing MitoKaede are marked in green, and nucleus is marked in blue in this figure. After small region of photoswitching with UV-light, mitochondria change color from green to red. When photoswitched mitochondria labeled as red fuse with mitochondria labeled as green, the color of mitochondria become yellow for the acquirement of GFP fluorescence

Mitochondrial fusion assayed by cell fusion

Cell fusion by treatment with polyethylene glycol (PEG) provides another way to study mitochondrial fusion dynamics. As illustrated in Fig. 3, a cell fusion model is generated using cells with mitochondria labeled in two different colors. Practically, cells expressing mtGFP and others with mtDsRed are mixed and plated commingled. The cells are kept in the presence of cycloheximide from before PEG treatment to block any de novo FP synthesis. Fused cells were imaged after 7 h to visualize the dramatic loss of fusion activity from deletion of mitofusin proteins (Chen et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2009), but to visualize fusion events in normal cells, imaging should be done within 2 h (Liu et al.2009).
Fig. 3

Cell fusion model using cells expressing mtDsRed and cells expressing mtGFP. Mitochondria expressing mtGFP or mtDsRed are marked in green or red, and nucleus is marked in blue in this figure. In cell hybrids between cells expressing mtGFP and cells mtDsRed, mitochondria become yellow after green-labeled mitochondria fuse with red-labeled mitochondria

Mitochondrial Transcription and Replication Imaging by In Situ Hybridization

Understanding the replication and transcription of mtDNA is important to a complete picture of mitochondrial dynamics. The mitochondrial transcription and replication imaging protocol (mTRIP) is a modified fluorescence in situ hybridization approach that specifically targets replicating mtDNA nucleoids and can simultaneously be used to exhibit transcription activity by targeting mtRNA. When combined with labeling of the mitochondria by immunofluorescence or MitoTracker loading, mTRIP allows classification of the organelles by replication and/or transcription activity, which has shown to change depending on physiological conditions (Chatre and Ricchetti 2015).

Imaging Mitochondrial Dynamics by Super-Resolution Microscopy

Conventional confocal microscopy techniques have a limited resolving power of ~250 nm, due to the properties of light. This diffraction limit is close to the size of mitochondria, which are typically 0.5–1 μm in diameter. However, newly developed super-resolution imaging technologies supply new ways to analyze mitochondrial dynamics and the interactions among sub-cellular organelles. The following four methods of super-resolution microscopy have been commercialized: SIM (Gustafsson 2005), STED (Hell 2003), PALM(Betzig et al. 2006)/STORM (Rust et al. 2006), and Zeiss Airyscan. Any ordinary fluorescent probes and dyes are in principle usable in SIM and Airyscan imaging. Both of these techniques provide resolution of ~130 nm in commercial devices, making it possible to visualize that mitochondria contain different compartments, i.e., distinguish outer membrane from matrix (Gustafsson 2000, 2005). However, with these techniques, it is still not possible to visualize the dynamics of the two membranes of mitochondria, including the events of protein interactions and membrane detaching (Kukat et al. 2011; Jans et al. 2013). STED and PALM technologies can attain better resolution, 50 and 20 nm, respectively (Rust et al. 2006; Shim et al. 2012; Jans et al. 2013). However, not all fluorescent dyes targeted to mitochondria could be used in these two methods and combinations of multiple colors remain especially difficult. However, PALM imaging of mitochondrial dynamics in live cells using a single color has been achieved (Fernandez-Suarez and Ting 2008; Shim et al. 2012; Shcherbakova et al. 2014).

Fluorophores applied for PALM imaging of mitochondrial dynamics must have appropriate ability to switch between dark and fluorescing states, and should have a high quantum efficiency to minimize photodamage of the sample (Patterson et al. 2010; Shcherbakova et al. 2014). Three fluorescent dyes have been used in PALM imaging of mitochondrial dynamics: MitoTracker Orange, MitoTracker Red, and MitoTracker Deep Red (Shim et al. 2012). The cells are labeled according to the ordinary protocol, but should be imaged with PALM system with an extremely high-speed camera (such as sCMOS) to avoid artifacts from the high speed of diffusion of the dyes. The SNAP-tag and CLIP-tag (NEB, MA) or HaloTag (Promega) systems could also be used in super-resolution imaging of mitochondrial dynamics (Klein et al. 2011; Lukinavicius et al. 2013). Mitochondria-targeted proteins carrying these tags can be imaged with PALM after conjugation with proper fluorescence dyes, such as TMR-Star (Klein et al. 2011) and SIR (Lukinavicius et al. 2013). Multi-color super-resolution images of mitochondrial dynamic events can also be achieved in this way.

There are three kinds of FPs that could be applicable in super-resolution imaging, including photoactivatable FPs (PAFPs), photoswitchable FPs (PSFPs), and reversely photoswitchable FPs (rsFPs) (Shcherbakova et al. 2014). PAFPs are not ideal for single-color imaging with PALM as these FPs are invisible in pre-imaging, making it difficult to find the interesting areas and events. They are, however, in principle useful for multi-color super-resolution imaging since each occupies only one color. Both PAGFP and PAmCherry can be used in PALM imaging, though their optical properties are far from optimal.

Many PSFPs have already been used in time-lapse imaging of mitochondrial dynamics as described above, including mEOS family proteins, mKiKGR, and Dendra2. Each of these could also in principle be used in PALM imaging. PSmOrange and PSmOrange2 have potential for use in multi-color PALM imaging using the far-red spectrum (Subach et al. 2011).

rsFPs can be switched on or off by an illumination at different wavelengths. They are potentially useful for studying mitochondrial dynamics with PALM. However, there are few rsFPs that could be applicable in PALM imaging due to the requirement for high quantum efficiency and long half-time period. Dronpa family members such as Dronpa2 and Dronpa3 have been successfully applied in PALM imaging of mitochondria (Rocha et al. 2014). Newly developed mGeos-M is derived from mEos2 and was reported to also be effective in PALM imaging (Chang et al. 2012). Thus, it is another candidate for mitochondrial dynamics with PALM imaging.

Discussion

While the promise of spectrally diverse fluorophores and reporter strains is exciting for the study of mitochondrial dynamics, the choice of proper FPs or probes is crucial for success in most applications. These probes and live imaging approaches can be used to understand basic biological mechanisms of mitochondrial dynamics, and have already given ground-breaking insight into mitochondrial dynamics and answered some basic questions around mitochondrial biology.

Impediments to the further development of live imaging include: (1) the stability of FPs and probes, (2) the intensity of readily detectable fluorescence that is required for live imaging, (3) the toxicity of many FP fusion proteins when expressed at readily detectable levels and probes that may affect mitochondrial metabolism, and (4) the availability of reagents for directing lineage-specific FP expression.

Advances in live imaging are facilitating the visualization of development at single-cell resolution in living zebrafish embryos (Andersen et al. 2010) or C. elegans (Cornaglia et al. 2015). As reflected in these studies, FPs have immense potential for live imaging applications. We can predict that high-resolution microscopy will give a deeper understanding of mitochondrial dynamics in living mammalian.

Super-resolution microscopy has already made headways in mitochondrial biology (Jakobs and Wurm 2014) but significant limitations remain in live and multi-color applications of the higher resolution approaches of STED, PALM, and STORM. Progress with new fluorophores/fluorescent proteins, especially ones that can utilize longer excitation wavelengths, are expected to move this field forward. Furthermore, development of protocols for quantitative data analysis will greatly enhance the information that can be harvested from STORM/PALM datasets.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the “973” program (2013CB967403, 2012CB721105, and 2016YFA0100302), the “Frontier Science Key Research Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-SMC001), the National Natural Science Foundation projects of China (31622037, 31271527, 81570520, 31601176, and 31601088), Guangzhou Science and Technology Program (2014Y2-00161), Guangzhou Health Care and Cooperative Innovation Major Project (201604020009), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists (S20120011368), Guangdong Province Science and Technology Innovation The Leading Talents Program (2015TX01R047), Guangdong Province Science and Technology Innovation Young Talents Program (2014TQ01R559), Guangdong Province Science and Technology Program (2015A020212031), the PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2014A030310071), and by NIH Grants (AA017773 and DK051526) to G.H.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Xingguo Liu, Liang Yang, Qi Long, David Weaver and György Hajnóczky declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Andersen E, Asuri N, Clay M, Halloran M (2010) Live imaging of cell motility and actin cytoskeleton of individual neurons and neural crest cells in zebrafish embryos. J Vis Exp 36:1726Google Scholar
  2. Ando R, Hama H, Yamamoto-Hino M, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A (2002) An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12651–12656CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Appelhans T, Richter CP, Wilkens V, Hess ST, Piehler J, Busch KB (2012) Nanoscale organization of mitochondrial microcompartments revealed by combining tracking and localization microscopy. Nano Lett 12:610–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF (2006) Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313:1642–1645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carvalho PH, Correa JR, Guido BC, Gatto CC, De Oliveira HC, Soares TA, Neto BA (2014) Designed benzothiadiazole fluorophores for selective mitochondrial imaging and dynamics. Chemistry 20:15360–15374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang H, Zhang M, Ji W, Chen J, Zhang Y, Liu B, Lu J, Zhang J, Xu P, Xu T (2012) A unique series of reversibly switchable fluorescent proteins with beneficial properties for various applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:4455–4460CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatre L, Ricchetti M (2015) mTRIP: an imaging tool to investigate mitochondrial DNA dynamics in physiology and disease at the single-cell resolution. Methods Mol Biol 1264:133–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chazotte B (2011) Labeling mitochondria with MitoTracker dyes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011:990–992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Detmer SA, Ewald AJ, Griffin EE, Fraser SE, Chan DC (2003) Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J Cell Biol 160:189–200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chudakov DM, Belousov VV, Zaraisky AG, Novoselov VV, Staroverov DB, Zorov DB, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov KA (2003) Kindling fluorescent proteins for precise in vivo photolabeling. Nat Biotechnol 21:191–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornaglia M, Mouchiroud L, Marette A, Narasimhan S, Lehnert T, Jovaisaite V, Auwerx J, Gijs MA (2015) An automated microfluidic platform for C. elegans embryo arraying, phenotyping, and long-term live imaging. Sci Rep 5:10192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Detmer SA, Chan DC (2007) Functions and dysfunctions of mitochondrial dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:870–879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ekanayake SB, El Zawily AM, Paszkiewicz G, Rolland A, Logan DC (2015) Imaging and analysis of mitochondrial dynamics in living cells. Methods Mol Biol 1305:223–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez-Suarez M, Ting AY (2008) Fluorescent probes for super-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:929–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman JR, Nunnari J (2014) Mitochondrial form and function. Nature 505:335–343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Fukasawa Y, Tsuji J, Fu SC, Tomii K, Horton P, Imai K (2015) MitoFates: improved prediction of mitochondrial targeting sequences and their cleavage sites. Mol Cell Proteom 14:1113–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gustafsson MG (2000) Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J Microsc 198:82–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustafsson MG (2005) Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13081–13086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hell SW (2003) Toward fluorescence nanoscopy. Nat Biotechnol 21:1347–1355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang LJ, Wang L, Ma Y, Durick K, Perkins G, Deerinck TJ, Ellisman MH, Taylor SS (1999) NH2-Terminal targeting motifs direct dual specificity A-kinase-anchoring protein 1 (D-AKAP1) to either mitochondria or endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 145:951–959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang S, Han R, Zhuang Q, Du L, Jia H, Liu Y, Liu Y (2015a) New photostable naphthalimide-based fluorescent probe for mitochondrial imaging and tracking. Biosens Bioelectron 71:313–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang S, Han R, Zhuang Q, Du L, Jia H, Liu Y, Liu Y (2015b) New photostable naphthalimide-based fluorescent probe for mitochondrial imaging and tracking. Biosens Bioelectron 71:313–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jakobs S, Wurm CA (2014) Super-resolution microscopy of mitochondria. Curr Opin Chem Biol 20:9–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jans DC, Wurm CA, Riedel D, Wenzel D, Stagge F, Deckers M, Rehling P, Jakobs S (2013) STED super-resolution microscopy reveals an array of MINOS clusters along human mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:8936–8941CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Joshi DC, Bakowska JC (2011) Determination of mitochondrial membrane potential and reactive oxygen species in live rat cortical neurons. J Vis Exp 51:e2704Google Scholar
  26. Karbowski M, Cleland MM, Roelofs BA (2014) Photoactivatable green fluorescent protein-based visualization and quantification of mitochondrial fusion and mitochondrial network complexity in living cells. Methods Enzymol 547:57–73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Katajisto P, Dohla J, Chaffer CL, Pentinmikko N, Marjanovic N, Iqbal S, Zoncu R, Chen W, Weinberg RA, Sabatini DM (2015) Stem cells. Asymmetric apportioning of aged mitochondria between daughter cells is required for stemness. Science 348:340–343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein T, Loschberger A, Proppert S, Wolter S, van de Linde S, Sauer M (2011) Live-cell dSTORM with SNAP-tag fusion proteins. Nat Methods 8:7–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kukat C, Wurm CA, Spahr H, Falkenberg M, Larsson NG, Jakobs S (2011) Super-resolution microscopy reveals that mammalian mitochondrial nucleoids have a uniform size and frequently contain a single copy of mtDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13534–13539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuzmenko A, Tankov S, English BP, Tarassov I, Tenson T, Kamenski P, Elf J, Hauryliuk V (2011) Single molecule tracking fluorescence microscopy in mitochondria reveals highly dynamic but confined movement of Tom40. Sci Rep 1:195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Liesa M, Shirihai OS (2013) Mitochondrial dynamics in the regulation of nutrient utilization and energy expenditure. Cell Metab 17:491–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu X, Weaver D, Shirihai O, Hajnoczky G (2009) Mitochondrial ‘kiss-and-run’: interplay between mitochondrial motility and fusion-fission dynamics. EMBO J 28:3074–3089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Logan DC, Leaver CJ (2000) Mitochondria-targeted GFP highlights the heterogeneity of mitochondrial shape, size and movement within living plant cells. J Exp Bot 51:865–871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lovy A, Molina AJ, Cerqueira FM, Trudeau K, Shirihai OS (2012) A faster, high resolution, mtPA-GFP-based mitochondrial fusion assay acquiring kinetic data of multiple cells in parallel using confocal microscopy. J Vis Exp 65:e3991Google Scholar
  35. Lukinavicius G, Umezawa K, Olivier N, Honigmann A, Yang G, Plass T, Mueller V, Reymond L, Correa IR Jr, Luo ZG, Schultz C, Lemke EA, Heppenstall P, Eggeling C, Manley S, Johnsson K (2013) A near-infrared fluorophore for live-cell super-resolution microscopy of cellular proteins. Nat Chem 5:132–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Malka F, Guillery O, Cifuentes-Diaz C, Guillou E, Belenguer P, Lombes A, Rojo M (2005) Separate fusion of outer and inner mitochondrial membranes. EMBO Rep 6:853–859CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Martelli PL, Savojardo C, Fariselli P, Tasco G, Casadio R (2015) Computer-based prediction of mitochondria-targeting peptides. Methods Mol Biol 1264:305–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsushima R, Hamamura Y, Higashiyama T, Arimura S, Sodmergen Tsutsumi N, Sakamoto W (2008) Mitochondrial dynamics in plant male gametophyte visualized by fluorescent live imaging. Plant Cell Physiol 49:1074–1083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McBride HM, Neuspiel M, Wasiak S (2006) Mitochondria: more than just a powerhouse. Curr Biol: CB 16:R551–R560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitra K, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2010) Analysis of mitochondrial dynamics and functions using imaging approaches. Curr Protoc Cell Biol Chapter 4: Unit 4 25 21–21Google Scholar
  41. Owens GC, Edelman DB (2015) Photoconvertible fluorescent protein-based live imaging of mitochondrial fusion. Methods Mol Biol 1313:237–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Owens GC, Walcott EC (2012) Extensive fusion of mitochondria in spinal cord motor neurons. PLoS ONE 7:e38435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Patterson GH, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2002) A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science 297:1873–1877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Patterson G, Davidson M, Manley S, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2010) Superresolution imaging using single-molecule localization. Ann Rev Phys Chem 61:345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pham AH, McCaffery JM, Chan DC (2012) Mouse lines with photo-activatable mitochondria to study mitochondrial dynamics. Genesis 50:833–843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Rocha S, De Keersmaecker H, Uji-i H, Hofkens J, Mizuno H (2014) Photoswitchable fluorescent proteins for superresolution fluorescence microscopy circumventing the diffraction limit of light. Methods Mol Biol 1076:793–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X (2006) Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods 3:793–795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Scaduto RC Jr, Grotyohann LW (1999) Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential using fluorescent rhodamine derivatives. Biophys J 76:469–477CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Shcherbakova DM, Sengupta P, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Verkhusha VV (2014) Photocontrollable fluorescent proteins for superresolution imaging. Ann Rev Biophys 43:303–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shim SH, Xia C, Zhong G, Babcock HP, Vaughan JC, Huang B, Wang X, Xu C, Bi GQ, Zhuang X (2012) Super-resolution fluorescence imaging of organelles in live cells with photoswitchable membrane probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:13978–13983CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Subach FV, Patterson GH, Manley S, Gillette JM, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Verkhusha VV (2009) Photoactivatable mCherry for high-resolution two-color fluorescence microscopy. Nat Methods 6:153–159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Subach OM, Patterson GH, Ting LM, Wang Y, Condeelis JS, Verkhusha VV (2011) A photoswitchable orange-to-far-red fluorescent protein, PSmOrange. Nat Methods 8:771–777CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Suzuki H, Maeda M, Mihara K (2002) Characterization of rat TOM70 as a receptor of the preprotein translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane. J Cell Sci 115:1895–1905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tatsuta T, Langer T (2008) Quality control of mitochondria: protection against neurodegeneration and ageing. EMBO J 27:306–314CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Twig G, Elorza A, Molina AJ, Mohamed H, Wikstrom JD, Walzer G, Stiles L, Haigh SE, Katz S, Las G, Alroy J, Wu M, Py BF, Yuan J, Deeney JT, Corkey BE, Shirihai OS (2008) Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J 27:433–446CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiedenmann J, Ivanchenko S, Oswald F, Schmitt F, Rocker C, Salih A, Spindler KD, Nienhaus GU (2004) EosFP, a fluorescent marker protein with UV-inducible green-to-red fluorescence conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15905–15910CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilkens V, Kohl W, Busch K (2013) Restricted diffusion of OXPHOS complexes in dynamic mitochondria delays their exchange between cristae and engenders a transitory mosaic distribution. J Cell Sci 126:103–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Yamakoshi H, Palonpon A, Dodo K, Ando J, Kawata S, Fujita K, Sodeoka M (2015) A sensitive and specific Raman probe based on bisarylbutadiyne for live cell imaging of mitochondria. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 25:664–667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang L, Long Q, Liu J, Tang H, Li Y, Bao F, Qin D, Pei D, Liu X (2015) Mitochondrial fusion provides an ‘initial metabolic complementation’ controlled by mtDNA. Cell Mol Life Sci 72:2585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM (2012) Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 337:1062–1065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, South China Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and HealthChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Pathology, MitoCare Center, Anatomy and Cell BiologyThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations