Advertisement

The Indian Journal of Labour Economics

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 489–509 | Cite as

Impacts of Vocational Education and Training on Employment and Wages in Indian Manufacturing Industries: Variation across Social Groups—Empirical Evidences from the 68th Round NSSO Data

  • Tanima BanerjeeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Vocational education and training (VET) is critical in developing skilled manpower resources in a country. However, in India, where various administrative and institutional factors are key in the determination of employment and wages, people from all social groups may not benefit equally, from VET. This study analyses how the impact of VET on employment and wages varies across social groups in the Indian manufacturing sector. The main data source for this study is the Employment and Unemployment Survey in India (10th Schedule) of the 68th National Sample Survey quinquennial round (2011–2012). To tackle the problem of bias in sample selection, this study uses Heckman’s Sample Selection Model (1979) with the two-steps estimation technique (Heckit). It reveals that VET significantly enhances participation from all social groups in the manufacturing sector and aggregates wages, but is ineffective in certain manufacturing industries. In certain cases, VET variously impacts wages across workers from different castes and ethnicities.

Keywords

Employment Wage Vocational education and training Social groups Manufacturing India 

JEL Classification

C20 C24 J21 J24 J31 

References

  1. Agarwal, T. (2013), “Gender and caste-based wage discrimination in India: Some recent evidence”, Journal of Labour Market Research, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Arum, R. and Y. Shavit (1995), “Secondary Vocational Education and the Transition from School to Work”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A., M. Bertrand, S. Datta and S. Mullainathan (2009), “Labor market discrimination in Delhi: Evidence from a field experiment”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badawi, A. A. (2013), “TVET and entrepreneurship skills”, http://www.unevoc.unesco.org/fileadmin/up/2013_epub_revisiting_global_trends_in_tvet_chapter8.pdf, accessed on 21 July, 2015.
  5. Becker, G.S. (1957), The Economics of Discrimination, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
  6. Chakravarty, S. and E. Somanathan (2008), “Discrimination in an Elite Labour Market? Job Placements at IIM-Ahmedabad”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 43, No. 44, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
  7. Das, M.B. and P.V. Dutta (2007), “Does Caste Matter for Wages in the Indian Labor Market?”, http://www.iza.org/conference_files/worldb2008/dutta_p4261.pdf, accessed on 22 May, 2015.
  8. Das, P. (2007a), “Wage Inequality in Manufacturing Industries 1979–2002: A Case of West Bengal and Gujarat”, Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 303–16.Google Scholar
  9. Das, P. (2007b), “Economic Reform, Output and Employment Growth in Registered Manufacturing Industries in India: Testing Kaldor’s Hypotheses”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 42, No. 39, pp. 3978–85.Google Scholar
  10. Goel, V.P. (2009), “Technical and VET (TVET) System in India for Sustainable Development”, http://www.unevoc.unesco.org/up/India_Country_Paper.pdf, accessed on 15 April, 2015.
  11. Heckman, J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 152–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leontaridi, M. (1998), “Segmented Labour Markets: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 63–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaldor, N. (1966), “Causes of the Slow Rate of Growth in the UK”, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
  14. Madheswaran, S., and P. Attewell (2007.), “Caste Discrimination in the Indian Urban Labour Market: Evidence from the NSS”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 42, No. 41, pp. 4146–53.Google Scholar
  15. Mincer, J.A. (1974), Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  16. Neuman, S., and A. Ziderman (1989), “Vocational Schooling, Occupational Matching, and Labor Market Earnings in Israel”, Journal of Human Resources Vol. XXVI, pp. 2.Google Scholar
  17. National Sample Survey Office (2012), Socio-Economic Survey, Sixty-Eighth Round: July 2011-June 2012, Schedule 10: Employment and Unemployment, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  18. Papola, T.S. (2012), “Social Exclusion and Discrimination in the Labour Market”, http://www.ihdindia.org/sarnet/AntaraDhar_RevisedVersion.pdf, accessed on 20 April 2015.
  19. Schultz, T.W. (1971), Investment in Human Capital: The Role of Education and of Research, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Sengupta, A., and P. Das (2014), “Gender Wage Discrimination across Social and Religious Groups in India: Estimates with Unit Level Data”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 49, No. 21, pp. 71–76.Google Scholar
  21. Thorat, S., P. Attewell and F. F. Rizvi (2009), “Urban Labour Market Discrimination”, Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, New Delhi, India, Working Paper Series, Vol. III, No. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Labour Economics 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations