Advertisement

International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 245–249 | Cite as

Dynamic Properties of Calcareous Sand from the Persian Gulf in Comparison with Siliceous Sands Database

  • Yaser JafarianEmail author
  • Hamed Javdanian
Technical Note

Abstract

Results of several cyclic triaxial and resonant column experiments on calcareous sand were presented by the authors in a preceding paper to obtain the shear modulus and damping ratio of the sand under various effective confining pressures and relative densities. The calcareous sand was taken from Bushehr, one of the most strategic ports of Iran in the Persian Gulf. This technical note compares dynamic properties of this coastal sand with a comprehensive database compiled from the experiments on various siliceous sands. The discrepancy observed between the experimental results of the calcareous sand and those of the siliceous sands is demonstrated. These differences can be attributed to the grains’ shape, mineralogy, and texture of the calcareous and siliceous sands. The comparative study provides useful insights into the dynamic properties of the studied calcareous sand.

Keywords

Dynamic properties Calcareous sand Persian Gulf Resonant column Cyclic triaxial Siliceous sand database 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper presents part of a research project funded by International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES) of Iran under Contract no. AM-7/507-6723-545, and this support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Holmes A (1978) Principles of physical geology. Sunbury-on-Thames, Nelson, London, p 730Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hassanlourad M, Salehzadeh H, Shahnazari H (2008) Dilation and particle breakage effects on the shear strength of calcareous sands based on energy aspects. Int J Civil Eng 6(2):108–119Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jafarian Y, Haddad A, Javdanian H (2015) Comparing the shear stiffness of calcareous and silicate sands under dynamic and cyclic straining. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference of seismology and earthquake engineering, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jafarian Y, Haddad A, Javdanian H (2016) Estimating the shearing modulus of Boushehr calcareous sand using resonant column and cyclic triaxial experiments. Modares Civ Eng J 15(4):9–19Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jafarian Y, Javdanian H, Haddad A (2016) Comparing dynamic behavior of Hormuz calcareous and Babolsar siliceous sands under identical conditions. Bull Earthq Sci Eng 3(3):1–10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shahnazari H, Jafarian Y, Tutunchian MA, Rezvani R (2016) Undrained cyclic and monotonic behavior of hormuz calcareous sand using hollow cylinder simple shear tests. Int J Civil Eng 14(4):209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jafarian Y, Javdanian H, Haddad A (2018) Strain-dependent dynamic properties of Bushehr siliceous-carbonate sand: experimental and comparative study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 107:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Javdanian H, Jafarian Y (2018) Dynamic shear stiffness and damping ratio of marine calcareous and siliceous sands. Geo Mar Lett 38(4):315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brandes HG (2011) Simple shear behavior of calcareous and quartz sands. Geotech Geol Eng 29:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jafarian Y, Javdanian H, Haddad A (2018) Dynamic properties of calcareous and siliceous sands under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions. Soils Found 58:172–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coop MR (1990) The mechanics of uncemented carbonate sands. Geotechnique 40(4):607–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma SS, Fahey M (2004) Deformation characteristics of two cemented calcareous soils. Can Geotech J 41(6):1139–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Powers MC (1953) A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. J Sediment Petrol 23(2):117–119Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jafarian Y, Javdanian H (2017) Dynamic behavior of calcareous sands. Bull Earthq Sci Eng 4(1):27–36Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishihara K (1996) Soil behavior in earthquake geotechnics. Science Publications, Oxford, p 350Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xenaki VC, Athanasopoulos GA (2008) Dynamic properties and liquefaction resistance of two soil materials in an earthfill dam—laboratory test results. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(8):605–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim YS, Ha TG, Choi JJ, Chung CK (2007) The influence of dynamic properties of ground soil on vibration characteristics of rigid body on sand ground. KSCE J Civ Eng 11(2):81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Javdanian H (2017) Evaluation of soil liquefaction potential using energy approach: experimental and statistical investigation. Bull Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1201-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jafarian Y, Towhata I, Baziar MH, Noorzad A, Bahmanpour A (2012) Strain energy based evaluation of liquefaction and residual pore water pressure in sands using cyclic torsional shear experiments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 35:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K, Coop MR (2013) The dynamics of a pumice granular soil in dry state under isotropic resonant column testing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 45:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T (2013) Effect of uniformity coefficient on G/G max and damping ratio of uniform to well-graded quartz sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jafarian Y, Haddad A, Javdanian H (2014) Predictive model for normalized shear modulus of cohesive soils. Acta Geodyn Geomater 11(1):89–100Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Javdanian H, Jafarian Y, Haddad A (2015) Predicting damping ratio of fine-grained soils using soft computing methodology. Arab J Geosci 8(6):3959–3969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Javdanian H, Haddad A, Jafarian A (2015) Evaluation of dynamic behavior of fine-grained soils using group method of data handling. Transp Infrastruct Eng 1(3):77–92.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Javdanian H (2017) Assessment of shear stiffness ratio of cohesionless soils using neural modeling. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(3):1045–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saxena SK, Reddy KR (1989) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for Monterey No. 0 sand by resonant column tests. Soils Found 29(2):37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hashiba T (1971) Simple shear apparatus using an inclinometer. Soils Found 11(3):113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y (1978) Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils Found 18(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found 20(2):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yasuda N, Matsumoto N (1993) Dynamic deformation characteristics of sand and rockfill materials. Can Geotech J 30(5):747–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stokoe KHII, Hwang SK, Darendeli MB, Lee NJ (1995) Correlation study of nonlinear dynamic soils properties. Final Report to Westinghouse Savannah River Company, AikenGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee RC (1996) Investigations of nonlinear dynamic soil properties at the Savannah River Site (U). WSRC–TR–96–0062. Westinghouse Savannah River Company, AikenGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hwang SK (1997) Dynamic properties of natural soils. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lo Presti DCF, Jamiolkowski M, Pallara O, Cavallaro A, Pedroni S (1997) Shear modulus and damping of soils. Geotechnique 47(3):603–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ribay ED, Maigre ID, Cabrillac R, Gouvenot D (2004) Shear modulus and damping ratio of grouted sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(6):461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Seed HB, Wong RT, Idriss IM, Tokimatsu K (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. J Geotech Eng 112(11):1016–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rollins KM, Evans MD, Diehl NB, Daily WD (1998) Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(5):398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geotechnical Engineering Research CenterInternational Institute of Earthquake Engineering and SeismologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringShahrekord UniversityShahrekordIran

Personalised recommendations