Advertisement

Numerical Modelling and Experimental Monitoring of a Full-Scale Diaphragm Wall

  • Valentina LentiniEmail author
  • Francesco Castelli
Research Paper
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Ground movements due to deep excavation may cause damage or loss of functionality to nearby building, especially in urban areas: embedded diaphragm walls between the new and the existing buildings can be effective in reducing these movements. The paper reports the results of an experimental and numerical study carried on a full-scale anchored piles diaphragm used to supporting deep excavation in urban area devoted to the new Library of the University of Enna “Kore”, Enna (Italy). Two piles, located in the central part of the diaphragm wall, have been instrumented with conventional inclinometer cases and embedded piezoelectric accelerometers. The experimental measurements recorded during the construction and in operation are reported and discussed in detail. Plane strain finite element analyses using the code PLAXIS 2D are presented in which the diaphragm was modelled to evaluate the geotechnical system behavior. It has been observed that this model allows for a satisfactory simulation of the displacement of the wall during the construction phases under a static loading scenario. The results in terms of horizontal displacements obtained by numerical modelling are in good agreement with those derived by measurements. Furthermore, on the basis of measured data, an empirical method has been used to evaluate the surface settlements, whose values guarantee a good safety threshold to the nearby building.

Keywords

Numerical modelling Excavation Monitoring Diaphragm wall 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Garrett C, Barnes SJ (1984) Design and performance of the Dunton Green retaining wall. Geotechnique 34(4):533–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raison CA (1985) Discussion on performance of proposed and cantilevered rigid walls. Geotechnique 35(4):540–544Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ikuta Y, Maruoka M, Aoki M, Sato E (1994) Application of the observational method to a deep basement excavated using the top–down observation method. Geotechnique 44(4):655–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Young DK, Ho EWL (1994) Observational approach to design of a sheet-piled retaining wall. Geotechnique 44(4):637–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ou CY, Liao JT, Cheng WL (2000) Building response and ground movements induced by a deep excavation. Geotechnique 50(3):209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gunn MJ, Clayton CRI (1992) Installation effects and their importance in the design of earth-retaining structures. Geotechnique 42(1):137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Moor EK (1994) An analysis of bored pile/diaphragm wall installation effects. Geotechnique 44(2):341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ng CWW, Yan RWM (1999) Three-dimensional modeling of a diaphragm wall construction sequence. Geotechnique 49(6):825–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conti R, de Sanctis L, Viggiani GMB (2012) Numerical modelling of installation effects for diaphragm walls in sand. Acta Geotech 7(3):219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen J, Lei H, Wang J (2014) Numerical analysis of the installation effect of diaphragm walls in saturated soft clay. Acta Geotech 9:981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peck RB (1969) Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applies soil mechanics. Geotechnique 19(2):171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G, Santucci de Magistris F (2013) An integrated seismic monitoring system for a full-scale embedded retaining wall. Geotech Test J 36(1):40–53.  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rainieri C, Dey A, Fabbrocino G, Santucci de Magistris F (2017) Interpretation of the experimentally measured dynamic response of an embedded retaining wall by finite element models. Measurement 104:316–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measure-ment.2016.05.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abdoun T, Danisch L, Ha D (2005) Advanced sensing for real-time monitoring of geotechnical systems. In: Proceedings of geo-Frontiers congress, 2005, Austin, Texas, USA, American Society of Civil EngineersGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor JR (1997) An Introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. University Science Books, Sausalito. ISBN 0-935702-75-XGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lo Iacono F, Navarra G, Oliva M (2017) Structural monitoring of “Himera” viaduct by low-cost MEMS sensors: characterization and preliminary results. Meccanica 52:3221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0691-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Castelli F, Freni G, Lentini V, Fichera A (2017) Modelling of a debris flow event in the Enna area for hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference on the material point method, MPM 2017, Delft, January 10–13, 2017, Procedia Eng 175:287–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.026
  18. 18.
    Castelli F, Castellano E, Contino F, Lentini V (2016) A web-based GIS system for landslide risk zonation: the case of Enna area (Italy). In: Proceedings of 12th international symposium on landslides, Napoli, Italy. Aversa et al. (eds) Landslides and engineered slopes. Experience, theory and practice. Associazione Geotecnica Italiana, Roma, Italy. ISBN 9781138029880Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Castelli F, Lentini V (2013) Landsliding events triggered by rainfalls in the Enna area (South Italy). In: Proceedings of second world landslide forum, WLF2 2011, Rome (Italy), vol 2: Early warning, instrumentation and monitoring. Margottini C et al (eds), Springer, Heidelberg, pp 39–47. ISBN 978-3-642-31444-5, ISBN 978-3-642-31445-2 (eBook).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31445-2
  20. 20.
    Brinkgreve RBJ, Vermeer PA (2006) PLAXIS. In: Brinkgreve RBJ, Broere W, Waterman D (eds). The Netherlands ISBN-10 90-76016-02-X, ISBN-13 978-90-76016-02-34Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martos F (1958) Concerning an approximate equation of the subsidence trough and its time factors. In: International strata control congress, Leipzig, pp 191–205Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peck RB (1969) Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground. In: 7th International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, state of the art report. Proceedings of 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Mexico City, pp 225–290Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidt B (1969) Settlements and ground movements associated with tunneling in soils. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rowe RK, Lo KY, Kack GJ (1983) A method of estimating surface settlement above tunnels constructed in soft ground. Can Geotech J 20(1):11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t83-002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mair RJ, Williamson MG (2014) The influence of tunneling and deep excavation on piled foundations. In: Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground—proceedings of 8th international symposium on geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground, TC204 ISSMGE—IS-SEOUL 2014. pp 21–30Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schanz T, Vermeer PA, Bonnier PG (2000) The hardening soil model: formulation and verification. In: Beyond 2000 in computational geotechnics—10 years of PLAXIS. Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5809 040 XGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Likitlersuang S, Surarak C, Wanatowski D, Oh E, Balasubramaniam A (2013) Finite element analysis of a deep excavation: a case study from the Bangkok MRT. Soils Found 53(5):756–773.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yasushi A, Kusakabe O, Murata O, Konishi S (2008) A numerical study on ground displacement and stress during and after the installation of deep circular diaphragm walls and soil excavation. Comput Geotech 35:791–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brinkgreve RBJ (2005) Selection of soil models and parameters for geotechnical engineering application. In: Soil constitutive models: evaluation, selection, and calibration. ASCE, geotechnical special publication no. 128. Evaluation, selection, and calibration, 2005. Geo-Frontiers congress 2005, Austin, Texas, USA.  https://doi.org/10.1061/40771(169)4

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geotechnical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of Enna KoreEnnaItaly

Personalised recommendations