Advertisement

International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 91–101 | Cite as

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Fundamental Mechanism of Tunnelling and Influence on Nearby Flat Foundation

  • H. M. Shahin
  • T. NakaiEmail author
  • K. Ishii
  • T. Iwata
  • S. Kuroi
Research Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

To investigate interaction problems between tunnel and existing shallow foundation, 2D model tests and the corresponding numerical simulations were carried out. For the model tests, a new tunnel apparatus to simulate tunnel excavation was developed, where the vertical and horizontal movement of the tunnel itself is allowed with satisfying the equilibrium between tunnel and the surrounding ground. The corresponding finite element analyses were conducted using FEMtij-2D software where elastoplastic model named the Subloading tij model is used as a constitutive model of soil. It is shown from model tests and numerical simulations that real movement of tunnel during excavation process is in between the conditions of fixed centre and fixed invert, though it is close to the condition of fixed invert in shallow tunnelling. The earth pressure distribution around the tunnel depends on the movement of tunnel itself as well as the inner displacement of the tunnel. The surface settlement trough is also very much influenced by the tunnel movement even if the inner displacement of tunnel is the same. In the influence of tunnelling on existing shallow foundation, the shear band in the ground develops toward the both edges of foundation. It follows that the maximum surface settlement occurs not above the tunnel but at the position of foundation, when the foundation exists near the tunnel. Unsymmetrical earth pressure distribution is seen around the tunnel near the existing foundation.

Keywords

Circular tunnelling Existing shallow foundation Model tests Numerical simulations 

Notes

Funding

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.
    Boscardin MD, Cording EJ (1989) Building response to excavation induced settlement. J Geotech Eng ASCE 115(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burd HJ, Houlsby GT, Augarde CE, Liu G (2000) Modelling the effects on masonry buildings of tunnelling-induced settlement. ICE Proc Geotech Eng. 143(1):17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franzius JN, Potts DM, Addenbrooke TI, Burland JB (2004) The Influence of building weight on tunneling-induced ground and building deformation. Soils Found 44(1):25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacobsz SW, Standing JR, Mair RJ, Hagiwara T, Sugitama T (2004) Centrifuge modeling of tunneling near driven piles. Soils Found 44(1):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loganathan N, Poulos HG, Xu KJ (2001) Ground and pile-group response due to tunnelling. Soils Found 41(1):57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shahin HM, Nakai T, Zhang F, Kikumoto M, Nakahara E (2011) Behavior of ground and response of existing foundation due to tunnelling. Soils Found 51(3):395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shahin HM, Nakai T, Ishii K, Iwata T, Kuroi S (2016) Invetigation of influence of tunneling on existing building and tunnel—model tests and numerical simulations. Acta Geotechnicla 11(3):679–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakai T, Hinokio M (2004) A simple elastoplastic model for normally and over consolidated soils with unified material parameters. Soils Found 44(2):53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakai T (2012) Constitutive modeling of geomaterials: principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adrain RJ (1991) Particle imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 23:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakai T, Mihara Y (1984) A new mechanical quantity for soils and its application to elastoplastic constitutive models. Soils Found 24(2):82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hashiguchi K (1980) Constitutive equation of elastoplastic materials with elasto- plastic transition. J Appl Mech ASME 102(2):266–272CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakai T, Farias MM, Bastos D, Sato Y (2007) Simulation of conventional and inverted braced excavation using subloading tij model. Soils Found 47(3):597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakai T, Shahin HM, Zhang F, Hinokio M, Kikumoto M, Yonaha S, Nishio A (2010) Bearing capacity of reinforced foundation subjected to pull-out loading in 2D and 3D conditions. Geotext Geomembr 28(3):268–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Islamic University of TechnologyGazipurBangladesh
  2. 2.Geo-Research InstituteNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Kajima CorporationTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Nippon Telegram and Telephone West CorporationOsakaJapan
  5. 5.Okumura CorporationMiyagiJapan
  6. 6.Nagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations