Advertisement

International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 11, pp 1549–1559 | Cite as

Calcined Marl and Condensed Silica Fume as Partial Replacement for Ordinary Portland Cement

  • Abolfazl Soltani
  • Amir Tarighat
  • Masoud Varmazyari
Research paper

Abstract

The main objective of this investigation is to replace calcined marl (0, 10, 20%) and condensed silica fume (SF, 0, 7, 10%) partially for ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Marl, a calcium-based supplementary cementitious material (SCM) calcines at a considerably lower temperature (750 °C) than OPC (up to 1480 °C). The calcined marl contributes in prolonged pozzolanic reactions and represents characteristics of latent cement chemistry. To approach the major conclusions, 27 mixes were designed based on the three ratios of water to the total binders (W/B) of 0.38, 0.42 and 0.45. The calcined marl and SF proportioned in mixes with “0, 10 and 20%” and “0, 7 and 10%”, respectively. After the ages of 7, 28 and 90 days all mixes improved, mechanically. In particular, the hardened concretes containing 10 and 20% of calcined marl show stronger reaction for substitution of OPC. In the lower limit of W/B ratio (0.38) mixes with 20% calcined marl exhibit a remarkable increase of some 2.4-fold strengths from 7 to 90 days. Also, the results obtained by tensile strength and modulus of rupture for concrete mixes containing 10 and 20% calcined marl highlight the mechanical progress of hardened concrete after 28 days. Collectively, both SCMs replaced OPC in a considerable amount (up to 30%). However, long-term enhancement in mechanical strength and durability indices are typically supported by calcined marl.

Keywords

Cement Calcined marl SF Mechanical strength Durability indices 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU), Tehran, Iran, for technical laboratory equipment and experimental materials provided for performing this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Gartner E (2004) Industrially interesting approaches to “low–CO2” cements”. Cem Concr Res 34:1489–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sata V, Sathonsaowaphak A, Chindaprasirt P (2012) Resistance of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar to sulphate and sulfuric acid attack. Cement Concrete Composite 34:700–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hughes DC, Jaglin D, Kozlowski R, Mayr N, Mucha D, Weber J (2007) Calcination of marls to produce Roman cement. J ASTM Int 4(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI100661. https://www.astm.org CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosoaga A, Masek O, Oakey JE (2009) CO2 capture technologies for cement industry. Energy Proc 1(1):133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang MH, Lastra R, Malhotra VM (1996) Rice-Husk ash paste and concrete: some aspects of hydration and the microstructure of the interfacial zone between aggregate and paste. Cem Concr Res 26(6):963–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiattikomol K, Jaturapitakkul C, Songpiriyakij S, Chutubtim S (2001) A study of ground coarse fly ashes with different fineness from various sources as pozzolanic materials. Cem Concr Compos 23:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Justnes H, Østnor T, De Weerdt K, Vikan H, Calcined Marl and Clay as Mineral Addition for More Sustainable Concrete Structures. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures, 14–16 August 2011; Singapore, ISBN 978-981-08-9528-0. http://cipermier.com/100036010
  8. 8.
    Papadakis VG, Tsimas S (2002) Supplementary cementing materials in concrete part I: efficiency and design. Cem Concr Res 32:1525–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Q, Yan P, Mi G (2012) Effect of blended steel slag–GBFS mineral admixture on hydration and strength of cement. Constr Build Mater 35:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antiohos S, Maganari K, Tsimas S (2005) Evaluation of blends of high and low calcium fly ashes for use as supplementary cementing materials. Cem Concr Compos 27:349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes DC, Jaglin D, Kozlowski R, Mucha D (2009) Roman cements-Belite cements calcined at low temperature. Cem Concr Res 39:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weber J, Gadermayr N, Kozlowski R, Mucha D, Hughes DC, Jaglin D (2007) Microstructure and mineral composition of roman cements produced at defined calcination conditions. Mater Charact 58:1217–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hughes DC, Sugden DB, Jaglin D, Mucha D (2008) Calcination of roman cement: a pilot study using cement-stones from whitby. Constr Build Mater 22:1446–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Varas MJ, Alvarez de Buergo M, Fort R (2005) Natural cement as the precursor of Portland cement: methodology for its identification. Cem Concr Res 35:2055–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutteridge WA, Dalziel JA (1990) Filler Cement: the effect of the secondary component on the hydration of Portland cement: part I: a fine non-hydraulic filler. Cem Concr Res 20(5):778–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gutteridge WA, Dalziel JA (1990) Filler cement: the effect of the secondary component on the hydration of Portland cement: part II: fine hydraulic binders. Cem Concr Res 20(6):853–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton RD (2011) Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 41:1244–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kolani B, Buffo-Lacarrière L, Sellier A, Escadeillas G, Boutillon L, Linger L (2012) Hydration of slag-blended cements. Cem Concr Compos 34:1009–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aiban SA (1995) Strength and compressibility of Abqaiq Marl, Saudi Arabia. Eng Geol 39:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fookes PG, Higginbottom IE (1975) The classification and description of near-shore carbonate sediments for engineering purposes. Geotechnique 2:406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hughes D, Swann S, Gardner A (2007) Roman cements part I: its origins and properties. J Archit Conserv 13(1):21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hughes D, Swann S, Gardner A (2007) Roman cements part II: stucco and decorative elements, a conservation strategy. J Archit Conserv 13(3):41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bagheri A, Zanganeh H, Moalemi MM (2012) Mechanical and durability properties of ternary concretes containing silica fume and low reactivity blast furnace slag. Cem Concr Compos 34(5):663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee KM, Lee HK, Lee SH, Kim GY (2006) Autogenous shrinkage of concrete containing granulated blast-furnace slag. Cem Concr Res 36:1279–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aldea C, Young F, Wang K, Shah SP (2000) Effects of curing conditions on properties of concrete using slag replacement. Cem Concr Res 30:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chidiac SE, Panesar DK (2008) Evolution of mechanical properties of concrete containing ground granulated blast furnace slag and effects on the scaling resistance test at 28 days. Cem Concr Compos 30:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lübeck A, Gastaldini ALG, Barin DS, Siqueira HC (2012) Compressive strength and electrical properties of concrete with white Portland cement and blast-furnace slag. Cem Concr Compos 34:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smarzewski P, Barnat-Hunek D (2017) Property assessment of hybrid fiber-reinforcement ultra-high-performance concrete. Int J Civil Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0145-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Biernacki JJ, Bullard JW, Sant G, Brown K, Glasser FP, Jones S, Ley T, Livingston R, Nicoleau L, Olek J, Sanchez F, Shahsavari R, Stutzman PE, Sobolev K, Prater T (2017) Cements in the 21st century: challenges, perspectives, and opportunities. J Am Ceram Soc 100(7):2746–2773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Avdic N, Delic S, Merdic N (2014) Interpretation of results obtained from analyses of some raw materials for cement production, from Ribnica and Grabovica deposits. Glasnik Hemicara I Tehnologa Bosne I Hercegovine. http://www.pmf.unsa.ba/hemija/glasnik/files/Issue%2042/42-17-20-Avdic.pdf
  31. 31.
    Mounika RR, Kiran RB, Krishna AV (2017) A study on replacement of cement with fly ash, silica fume and addition of steel slag in concrete. SSRG Int J Civil Eng (SSRG-IJCE) 4(5):82–88 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bernal SA, Juenger MCG, Xinyuan K, Matthes W, Lothenbach B, De Belie N (2017) Characterization of supplementary cementitious materials by thermal analysis. Mater Struct 50:26. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0909-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ng S, Jelle BP (2017) Incorporation of polymers into calcined clays as improved thermal insulating materials for construction. Adv Mater Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6478236 (Hindawi, Article ID 6478236, 6 pages)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shi C, Wu Z, Xiao J, Wang D, Huang Z, Fang Z (2015) A review on ultra high performance concrete: part I. Raw materials and mixture design. Constr Build Mater 101:741–751.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang Y, Lv W, Peng H (2016) Shear resistance evaluation of strain-hardening cementitious composites member. Int J Civil Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0123-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nili M, Azarioon A, Danesh A, Deihimi A (2016) Experimental study and modeling of fiber volume effects on frost resistance of fiber reinforced concrete. Int J Civil Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0122-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abolfazl Soltani
    • 1
  • Amir Tarighat
    • 1
  • Masoud Varmazyari
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringShahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations