Advertisement

International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 8, pp 1327–1340 | Cite as

Clustering Analysis of Drivers Based on Behavioral Characteristics Regarding Road Safety

  • Hamid ShirmohammadiEmail author
  • Farhad Hadadi
  • Moatasem Saeedian
Research Paper

Abstract

The present study was aimed at identifying driving behaviors and driving skills (i.e., ordinary violations, lack of experience errors, positive behaviors, lack of attention errors, dangerous errors, aggressive violations, perceptual-motor skills, and safety skills) in a large sample of young, middle-aged, and elderly tourists as specific subgroups of drivers based on combinations. Additionally, drivers’ risk-driving behaviors and skill deficits in terms of driving violations and errors, and traffic rule violations and accident involvements as measured by the Driver Behavior Questionnaire and the Driver Skill Inventory were evaluated. To this end, the questionnaires were completed by 681 participant drivers with three age subgroups (age < 30, age 30–40, age > 40), who had traveled to Baneh city in Iran. Based on a cluster analysis of driving behaviors and driving skills variables, five easily understandable drivers’ subgroups were investigated as safe drivers with low self-confidence, unsafe, and offensive drivers, safe, and skillful drivers, unsafe, and relatively unskilled drivers, and unskilled and relatively unsafe drivers. The drivers differed in terms of self-reported accident involvement, attitudes toward traffic safety and risk perception, and driving violations and errors. Finally, based on annual intentional and unintentional accidents and fines, the clusters were ranked. Then, the clusters were evaluated and analyzed statistically. The results indicated that unsafe and offensive cluster is the first unsafe subgroup among clusters. Safe and skillful cluster is classified as the safest subgroup among clusters.

Keywords

Tourists Driving behaviors and skills Violations Errors Cluster analysis 

Notes

Funding

The authors announce that there is not any funding in this paper. All the headings in this paper are not applicable.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Montazeri A (2004) Road-traffic-related mortality in Iran: a descriptive study. Public Health 118(2):110–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00173-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peden M (2005) Global collaboration on road traffic injury prevention. Int J Injury Control Saf Promot 12(2):85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15660970500086130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rolison JJ, Regev S, Moutari S, Feeney A (2018) What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? An assessment of law enforcement views, ordinary drivers’ opinions, and road accident records. Accid Anal Prev 115:11–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGwin G, Brown DB (1999) Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middleaged, and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 31(3):181–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00061-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCartt AT, Shabanova VI, Leaf WA (2003) Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. Accid Anal Prev 35(3):311–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00006-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rolison JJ, Hanoch Y, Wood S, Pi-Ju L (2014) Risk taking differences across the adult lifespan: a question of age and domain. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc 69:870–880.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moghaddam AM, Ayati E (2014) Introducing a risk estimation index for drivers: a case of Iran. Saf Sci 62:90–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Af Wåhlberg A, Dorn L, Kline T (2011) The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of road traffic accidents. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 12(1):66–86.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220903023376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elander J, West R, French D (1993) Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings. Psychol Bull 113(2):279–294.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sagberg F, Selpi Bianchi Piccinini GF, Engström J (2015) A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Hum Factors 57(7):1248–1275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815591313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kenneth B, Yan AF, Wang MQ (2009) A comparison of web-based and telephone surveys for assessing traffic safety concerns, beliefs, and behaviors. J Saf Res 40:377–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM (2004) The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res 6(4):e40.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kockelman KM, Kweon YJ (2002) Driver injury severity: an application of ordered probit models. Accid Anal Prev 34(3):313–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575 (01)00028 – 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lucidi F, Giannini AM, Sgalla R, Mallia L, Devoto A, Reichmann S (2010) Young novice driver subtypes: relationship to driving violations, errors and lapses. Accid Anal Prev 42(6):1689–1696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Batool Z, Carsten O (2018) Attitudinal segmentaion of drivers in Pakistan: The potential for effective road safety campaigns. Accid Anal Prev 114:48–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Higgs B, Abbas M (2015) Segmentation and clustering of car-following behavior: recognition of driving patterns. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(1):81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2326082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deery HA, Fildes BN (1999) Young novice driver subtypes: relationship to high-risk behavior, traffic accident record, and simulator driving performance. Hum Factors 41(4):628–643.  https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779656671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donovan DM, Umlauf RL, Salzberg PM (1988) Derivation of personality subtypes among high-risk drivers. Alcohol Drugs Driving 4:233–244Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ulleberg P (2001) Personality subtypes of young drivers. Relationship to risk-taking preferences, accident involvement, and response to a traffic safety campaign. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 4(4):279–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00029-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martinussen LM, Møller M, Prato CG (2014) Assessing the relationship between the Driver Behavior Questionnaire and the Driver Skill Inventory: Revealing sub-groups of drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 26:82–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cacciabue PC, Saad F (2008) Behavioural adaptations to driver support systems: a modelling and road safety perspective. Cogn Technol Work 10(1):31–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0075-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parker D, West R, Stradling S, Manstead AS (1995) Behavioural characteristics and involvement in different types of traffic accident. Accid Anal Prev 27(4):571–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(95)00005-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang W, Zhang W, Guo H, Bubb H, Ikeuchi K (2011) A safety-based approaching behavioural model with various driving characteristics. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 19(6):1202–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Winter JCF, Dodou D (2010) The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: a meta-analysis of accidents. J Saf Res 41(6):463–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sucha M, Sramkova L, Risser R (2014) The Manchester driver behaviour questionnaire: self-reports of aberrant behaviour among Czech drivers. Eur Transp Res Rev 6(4):493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-014-0147-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Everitt BS (1993) Cluster analysis, 3rd edn. Halsted Press, NYzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Milligan GW, Sokol LM (1980) A two-stage clustering algorithm with robust recovery characteristics. Educ Psychol Measur 40(3):755–759.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sarstedt M, Mooi E (2014) Cluster analysis. In: A concise guide to market research. Springer, Berlin, pp 273–324Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amorim RCD (2012) Constrained clustering with Minkowski weighted K-means. In: 2012 IEEE 13th international symposium on computational intelligence and informatics (CINTI), Budapest, Hungary, 20–22 Nov, 2012, pp 13–17.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI.2012.6496753
  30. 30.
    Stanton NA, Salmon PM (2009) Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf Sci 47(2):227–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reason J, Manstead A, Stradling S, Baxter J, Campbell K (1990) Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? Ergonomics 33(10–11):1315–1332.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3:257–266.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aberg L, Rimmö PA (1998) Dimensions of aberrant driver behavior. Ergonomics 41(1):39–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398187314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wagenaar WA, Groeneweg J (1987) Accidents at sea: Multiple causes and impossible consequences. Int J Man Mach Stud 27(5–6):587–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80017-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Parker D, Reason JT, Manstead AS, Stradling SG (1995) Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics 38(5):1036–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lawton R, Parker D, Manstead ASR, Stradling SG (1997) The role of affect in predicting social behaviors: the case of road traffic violations. J Appl Soc Psychol 27(14):1258–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01805.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Warner HW, Åberg L (2006) Drivers’ decision to speed: A study inspired by the theory of planned behavior. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 9(6):427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Özkan T, Lajunen T (2005) A new addition to DBQ: Positive driver behaviours scale. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 8(4–5):355–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gueho L, Granie MA, Abric JC (2014) French validation of a new version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) for drivers of all ages and level of experiences. Accid Anal Prev 63:41–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading. http://worldcat.org/isbn/0201020890
  41. 41.
    Shokohyar S, Taati E, Zolfaghari S (2017) The effect of drivers’ demographic characteristics on road accidents in different seasons using data mining. Promet Traffic Transp 29(6):555–567.  https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v29i6.2342 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Warner HW, Özkan T, Lajunen T, Tzamalouka G (2011) Cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ tendency to commit different aberrant driving behaviours. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 14(5):390–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Özkan T, Lajunen T, Chliaoutakis JE, Parker D, Summala H (2006) Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: a comparison of six countries. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 9(3):227–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lucidi F, Mallia L, Lazuras L, Violani C (2014) Personality and attitudes as predictors of risky driving among older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 72:318–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamid Shirmohammadi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Farhad Hadadi
    • 1
  • Moatasem Saeedian
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations