International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 51–61 | Cite as

Steel Bridge Service Life Prediction Using Bootstrap Method

  • Mohammad Reza Saberi
  • Ali Reza RahaiEmail author
  • Masoud Sanayei
  • Richard M. Vogel
Research Paper


Steel bridges play an important role in the transportation system of many countries. To ensure that bridges are structurally sound, engineers monitor their performance, which is known as structural health monitoring. Historical evidence indicates that bridge damage is pervasive and that the service life of bridges is decreasing. To manage safety and costs, engineers must be able to accurately predict the service life of bridges. A statistical method to predict service life for steel bridges is presented, which can assist bridge engineers, bridge owners, and state officials in the objective assessment of deteriorated bridges for retrofit or replacement. Timely repair and retrofit of bridges increase their safety levels and decrease costs. A nonparametric statistical approach based on the bootstrap method for stress analysis for fatigue life prediction of steel bridge components is proposed. The bootstrap provides a simple approach for the reproduction of the extremely complex probability distribution of measured strain data. It is completely automated numerical method which requires no theoretical calculations and it is not based on the asymptotic results. The service life index is introduced which quantifies the fatigue life of steel bridges under daily traffic loads. A regression model is developed for the prediction of remaining service life of steel bridges using a service life function. The predicted remaining service life derived from the function can contribute to effective management of steel bridges.


Steel bridges Service life Bootstrap Service life index Regression Simulated strains and stresses 


  1. 1.
    Wang ZY, Wang QY, Jiang RJ (2015) Finite element based fatigue assessment of corrugated steel web beams in highway bridges. Int J Civ Eng 13(4A):419–431Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grandic IS, Grandic D, Bjelanovic A (2015) Evaluation of torsional stiffness in beam and slab bridge decks based on load testing. Int J Civ Eng 13(3A):255–266Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tarighat A (2013) Model based damage detection of concrete bridge deck using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Int J Civ Eng 11(3):170–181Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miner MA, Calif SM (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech 12:A159–A164Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soliman M, Frangopol DM, Kown K (2013) Fatigue assessment and service life prediction of existing steel bridges by integrating SHM into a probabilistic bilinear S-N approach. J Struct Eng 139:1728–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou YE (2006) Assessment of bridge remaining fatigue life through field strain measurement. J Bridg Eng 11:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ye XW, Ni YQ, Wong KY, Ko JM (2012) Statistical analysis of stress spectra for fatigue life assessment of steel bridges with structural health monitoring data. Eng Struct 45:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alampalli S, Lund R (2006) Estimating fatigue life of bridge components using measured strains. J Bridg Eng 11:725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanayei M, Phelps JE, Sipple JD, Bell ES, Brenner BR (2012) Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements. J Bridg Eng 17:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ni YQ, Ye XW, Ko JM (2010) Monitoring-based fatigue reliability assessment of steel bridges: analytical model and application. J Struct Eng 136:1563–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang CS, Hao L, Fu BN (2012) Fatigue reliability updating evaluation of existing steel bridges. J Bridg Eng 17:955–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sahrapeyma A, Hosseini A, Marefat MS (2013) Life-cycle prediction of steel bridges using reliability-based fatigue deterioration profile: case study of neka bridge. Int J Steel Struct 13(2):229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oh BH, Lew Y, Choi YC (2007) Realistic assessment for safety and service life of reinforced concrete decks in girder bridges. J Bridg Eng 12:410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheung MS, Juan Z, Chan YB (2009) Service life prediction of RC bridge structures exposed to chloride environments. J Bridg Eng 14:164–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kwon K, Frangopol DM, Soliman M (2010) Bridge fatigue reliability assessment using probability density functions of equivalent stress range based on field monitoring data. Int J Fatigue 32:1221–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huckelbridge A, Kafali C, Gilmore D (2002) Implementation of field strain measurements for fatigue lifetime evaluation, Department of Civil Engineering Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio 44106Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fisher JW, Mertz DR, Zhong A (1983) Steel bridge members under variable amplitude. Long Life Fatigue Loading NCHRP Project 4:12–15Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wardhana K, Hadipriono FC (2003) Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements. J Perform Constr 17:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Framework for Improving Resilience of Bridge Design, FHWA-IF-11-016 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan THT, Li ZC, Ko JM (2001) Fatigue analysis and life prediction of bridges with structural health monitoring data—part II: application. Int J Fatigue 23:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Domma F, Condin F (2014) A new class of distribution functions for lifetime data. Preprint Submitt Reliab Eng Syst Saf. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.026 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sakin R, Ay I (2008) Statistical analysis of bending fatigue life data using Weibull distribution in glass-fiber reinforced polyester composites. Mater Des 29:1170–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Belzunce F, Riquelme CM, Ruiz J (2013) On sufficient conditions for mean residual life and related orders. Comput Stat Data Anal 61:199–210MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hartzell AL (2011) Lifetime prediction. MEMS Reliab. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6018-4_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Follen C, Sanayei M, Brenner B, Vogel R (2014) Statistical bridge signatures. J Bridg Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000596,04014022 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bigerelle M, Iost M (1999) Bootstrap analysis of FCGR, application to the Paris relationship and to lifetime prediction. Int J Fatigue 21:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bigerelle M, Najjar D, Fournier B, Rupin N, Ios A (2006) Application of lambda distributions and bootstrap analysis to the prediction of fatigue lifetime and confidence intervals. Int J Fatigue 8:223–236CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Efron B (1981) Censored data and the bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc 76:312–319MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7(1):1–26MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Interim Revision to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, 6th edition, Washington, DC (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Downing SD, Socie DF (1982) Simple rainflow counting algorithms. Int J Fatigue 4(1):31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stedinger JR, Vogel RM, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1993) Frequency Analysis of Extreme Events, Chapter 18, Handbook of Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, David R. Maidment, Editor- in-Chief, 1993Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Reza Saberi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ali Reza Rahai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Masoud Sanayei
    • 2
  • Richard M. Vogel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations