Advertisement

Guaranteed Cost Control in Delayed Teleoperation Systems Under Actuator Saturation

  • Leila Mohammadi
  • Alireza AlfiEmail author
Research Paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Control input saturation is a significant problem in the physical control systems, such as teleoperation systems, due to the limited power of actuators. The main goal of this paper is to present a control structure to achieve delay-independent stability of bilateral teleoperation systems under actuator saturation. Based on the Razumikhin theorem, stability analysis of such systems is realized via the state convergence technique. The difficulty of this stability study comes from the time delay appeared in the transmission channel and the nonlinearity term imposed by the control input saturation. First, a control structure is developed in terms of the transparency condition to attain the master and slave states convergence. Afterward, guaranteed cost controller (GCC) in terms of linear matrix inequality is designed to attain both stability and transparency simultaneously. Eventually, the optimal GCC’s parameters are computed by considering the problem under study as a convex optimization. Simulations illustrate that the performance of the control structure is satisfactory.

Keywords

Teleoperation Delay-independent stability Input saturation Guaranteed cost control State convergence 

References

  1. Ahmad U, Pan YJ (2018) A time domain passivity approach for asymmetric multilateral teleoperation system. IEEE Access 6:519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn SH, Yoon JS (2002) A bilateral control scheme for 2-DOF telemanipulators with control input saturation. Control Eng Pract 10:1081–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfi A, Farrokhi M (2006) Bilateral control to achieve transparent teleoperation with perturbation of static time delay. In: IECON 2006-32nd annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics, pp 513–518Google Scholar
  4. Alfi A, Bakhshi A, Yousefi M, Talebi HA (2016) Design and implementation of robust-fixed structure controller for telerobotic systems. J Intell Rob Syst 83:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aracil R, Azorín JM, Ferre M, Peña C (2013) Bilateral control by state convergence based on transparency for systems with time delay. Robot Auton Syst 61:86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azorin JM, Reinoso O, Aracil R, Ferre M (2004a) Control of teleoperators with communication time delay through state convergence. J Field Robot 21:167–182zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Azorin JM, Reinoso O, Aracil R, Ferre M (2004b) Generalized control method by state convergence for teleoperation systems with time delay. Automatica 40:1575–1582MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao YY, Sun YX, Cheng C (1998) Delay-dependent robust stabilization of uncertain systems with multiple state delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control 43:1608–1612MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao YY, Lin Z, Hu T (2002) Stability analysis of linear time-delay systems subject to input saturation. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Fundam Theory Appl 49:33–40MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang SS, Peng T (1972) Adaptive guaranteed cost control of systems with uncertain parameters. IEEE Trans Autom Control 17:474–483MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Rossi G, Muradore R (2017) A bilateral teleoperation architecture using Smith predictor and adaptive network buffering. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50:11421–11426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernando TL, Phat VN, Trinh HM (2013) Output feedback guaranteed cost control of uncertain linear discrete systems with interval time-varying delays. Appl Math Model 37:15809MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghadiri H, Jahed-Motlagh MR (2016) LMI-based criterion for the robust guaranteed cost control of uncertain switched neutral systems with time-varying mixed delays and nonlinear perturbations by dynamic output feedback. Complexity 21:555–578MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hokayem PF, Spong MW (2006) Bilateral teleoperation: an historical survey. Automatica 42:2035–2057MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu T, Lin Z (2001) Control systems with actuator saturation: analysis and design. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu T, Lin Z, Chen BM (2002) An analysis and design method for linear systems subject to actuator saturation and disturbance. Automatica 38:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang P, Dai P, Lu Z, Liu Z (2018) Asymmetric wave variable compensation method in dual-master-dual-slave multilateral teleoperation system. Mechatronics 49:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kawai Y, Fujita M (2008) Experimental implementation of bilateral teleoperation with time delay using command governor. In: SICE annual conference. IEEE, pp 2877–2882Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence DA (1993) Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 9:624–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee SJ, Ahn HS (2010) Synchronization of bilateral teleoperation systems with input saturation. In: IEEE international conference on control automation and systems, pp 1357–1361Google Scholar
  21. Lee SJ, Ahn HS (2011) A study on bilateral teleoperation with input saturation and systems. In: 11th international conference on control, automation and systems. IEEE, pp 161–166Google Scholar
  22. Lee S, Lee HS (1991) A kinesthetically coupled teleoperation: its modeling and control. In: Fifth international conference on advanced robotics. IEEE, pp 255–260Google Scholar
  23. Li Y, Johansson R, Liu K, Yin Y (2015) Guaranteed cost control design for delayed teleoperation systems. J Frankl Inst 352:5085–5105MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mohammadi L, Alfi A, Xu B (2017) Robust bilateral control for state convergence in uncertain teleoperation systems with time-varying delay: a guaranteed cost control design. Nonlinear Dyn 88:1413–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moheimani SR, Petersen IR (1997) Optimal quadratic guaranteed cost control of a class of uncertain time-delay systems. IEE Proc Control Theory Appl 144:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reinoso O, Sabater JM, Perez C, Azorin JM (2003) A new control method of teleoperation with time delay. In: The international conference on advanced robotics, Coimbra, Portugal, pp 100–105Google Scholar
  27. Sharifi M, Salarieh H, Behzadipour S, Tavakoli M (2017) Stable nonlinear trilateral impedance control for dual-user haptic teleoperation systems with communication delays. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr 139:121012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shia P, Boukasb EK, Shic Y, Agarwald RK (2003) Optimal guaranteed cost control of uncertain discrete time-delay systems. J Comput Appl Math 157:435–451MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang Z, Chen Z, Liang B, Zhang B (2018) A novel adaptive finite time controller for bilateral teleoperation system. Acta Astronaut 144:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang J, Liu W, Gao L, Li L, Li Z (2018) The master adaptive impedance control and slave adaptive neural network control in underwater manipulator uncertainty teleoperation. Ocean Eng 165:465–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao H, Zuo Z, Jia Z, Wang Y (2008) Guaranteed cost control for systems with saturating actuators and input delays. In: 2008 IEEE conference on robotics, automation and mechatronics. IEEE, pp 483–487Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical and Robotic EngineeringShahrood University of TechnologyShahroodIran

Personalised recommendations