Advertisement

Estimation of Remaining Useful Life of Rolling Element Bearings Using Wavelet Packet Decomposition and Artificial Neural Network

  • Abbas Rohani BastamiEmail author
  • Aref Aasi
  • Hesam Addin Arghand
Research paper

Abstract

Rolling element bearings (REBs) are usually considered among the most critical elements of rotating machines. Therefore, accurate prediction of remaining useful life (RUL) of REBs is a fundamental challenge to improve reliability of the machines. Vibration condition monitoring is the most popular method used for diagnosis of REBs and this is a motivating fact to use recorded vibration data in RUL prediction too. However, it is necessary to extract appropriate features from vibration signal that represent actual damage progress in the REB. In this paper, wavelet packet transform is used to extract signal features and artificial neural network is applied to estimate RUL of the REB. To obtain more accurate results, a method is proposed to find appropriate mother wavelet, optimal level and optimal node for signal decomposition. The desired features were extracted from the decomposed wavelet coefficients. To reduce random fluctuations, which is essential in real-life tests, a preprocessing algorithm was applied on the raw data. A multilayer perceptron neural network was selected and trained by preprocessed input data as well as non-processed input data, and results are compared. A series of accelerated life tests were conducted on a group of radially loaded bearings and vibration signals were acquired in whole life cycle of the tested REBs. Comparison of the experimental results with the output of the trained neural network shows enhanced prediction capability of the proposed method.

Keywords

Rolling element bearing Vibration Remaining useful life Wavelet packet transform Neural network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Experimental tests of this research were conducted in the vibration laboratory of Sharif University of Technology. Hereby, authors express their thanks to Professor Mehdi Behzad for his kind support and guidance.

References

  1. Akbari M, Homaei H, Heidari M (2014) An intelligent fault diagnosis approach for gears and bearings based on wavelet transform as a preprocessor and artificial neural networks. Int J Math Model Comput 4(4):309–329Google Scholar
  2. Al-Badour F, Sunar M, Cheded L (2011) Vibration analysis of rotating machinery using time–frequency analysis and wavelet techniques. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(6):2083–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali JB, Chebel-Morello B, Saidi L, Malinowski S, Fnaiech F (2015) Accurate bearing remaining useful life prediction based on Weibull distribution and artificial neural network. Mech Syst Signal Process 56:150–172Google Scholar
  4. Antoni J (2009) Cyclostationarity by examples. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(4):987–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bafroui HH, Ohadi A (2014) Application of wavelet energy and Shannon entropy for feature extraction in gearbox fault detection under varying speed conditions. Neurocomputing 133:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X, Shen Z, He Z, Sun C, Liu Z (2013) Remaining life prognostics of rolling bearing based on relative features and multivariable support vector machine. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 227(12):2849–2860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Thalji I, Jantunen E (2015) A summary of fault modelling and predictive health monitoring of rolling element bearings. Mech Syst Signal Process 60:252–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gebraeel NZ, Lawley MA (2008) A neural network degradation model for computing and updating residual life distributions. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 5(1):154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gebraeel N, Pan J (2008) Prognostic degradation models for computing and updating residual life distributions in a time-varying environment. IEEE Trans Reliab 57(4):539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gebraeel N, Lawley M, Liu R, Parmeshwaran V (2004) Residual life predictions from vibration-based degradation signals: a neural network approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 51(3):694–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gebraeel N, Lawley M, Li R, Ryan J (2005) Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals: a Bayesian approach. IIE Trans 37(6):543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gebraeel N, Elwany A, Pan J (2009) Residual life predictions in the absence of prior degradation knowledge. IEEE Trans Reliab 58:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goebel K, Eklund N, Bonanni P (2006) Fusing competing prediction algorithms for prognostics. In: 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, pp 10-ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo L, Li N, Jia F, Lei Y, Lin J (2017) A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing 240:98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris TA (2001) Rolling bearing analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Heng A, Zhang S, Tan AC, Mathew J (2009) Rotating machinery prognostics: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(3):724–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong S, Zhou Z, Zio E, Hong K (2014) Condition assessment for the performance degradation of bearing based on a combinatorial feature extraction method. Digit Signal Process 27:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard I (1994) Review of rolling element bearing vibration detection, diagnosis and prognosis (No. DSTO-RR-0013). Defence Science and Technology Organization Canberra (Australia)Google Scholar
  19. Hu C, Youn BD, Wang P, Yoon JT (2012) Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 103:120–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang R, Xi L, Li X, Liu CR, Qiu H, Lee J (2007) Residual life predictions for ball bearings based on self-organizing map and back propagation neural network methods. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(1):193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jammu NS, Kankar PK (2011) A review on prognosis of rolling element bearings. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3(10):7497–7503Google Scholar
  22. Jardine AKS, Makis V, Banjevic D, Braticevic D, Ennis M (1998) A decision optimization model for condition-based maintenance. J Qual Maint Eng 4(2):115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kankar PK, Sharma SC, Harsha SP (2011) Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using wavelet transform. Neurocomputing 74(10):1638–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim HE, Tan AC, Mathew J, Kim EY, Choi BK (2010) Prognosis of bearing failure based on health state estimation. In: Kiritsis D, Emmanouilidis C, Koronios A, Mathew J (eds) Engineering asset lifecycle management. Springer, London, pp 603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim HE, Tan AC, Mathew J, Choi BK (2012) Bearing fault prognosis based on health state probability estimation. Expert Syst Appl 39(5):5200–5213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kotzalas MN, Harris TA (2001) Fatigue failure progression in ball bearings. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Tribol 123(2):238–242Google Scholar
  27. Kulkarni PG, Sahasrabudhe AD (2013) Application of wavelet transform for fault diagnosisof rolling element bearings. Int J Technol Enhanc Emerg Eng Res 2(4):138–148Google Scholar
  28. Kumar HS, Srinivasa Pai P, Sriram NS, Vijay GS (2014) Selection of mother wavelet for effective wavelet transform of bearing vibration signals. Adv Mater Res 1039:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Y, Billington S, Zhang C, Kurfess T, Danyluk S, Liang S (1999) Adaptive prognostics for rolling element bearing condition. Mech Syst Signal Process 13(1):103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Y, Kurfess TR, Liang SY (2000) Stochastic prognostics for rolling element bearings. Mech Syst Signal Process 14(5):747–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu J, Wang W, Golnaraghi F (2009) A multi-step predictor with a variable input pattern for system state forecasting. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(5):1586–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu Z, Zuo MJ, Qin Y (2016) Remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings based on health state assessment. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 230(2):314–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loutas T, Roulias D, Georgoulas G (2013) Remaining useful life estimation in rolling bearings utilizing data-driven probabilistic e-support vectors regression. IEEE Trans Reliab 62(4):821–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marble S, Morton BP (2006) Predicting the remaining life of propulsion system bearings. In: 2006 IEEE Aerospace conference. IEEE, pp 8-ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Nandi S, Toliyat HA, Li X (2005) Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical motors—a review. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 20(4):719–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nikolaou NG, Antoniadis IA (2002) Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using wavelet packets. Ndt E Int 35(3):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng ZK, Chu FL (2004) Application of the wavelet transform in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnostics: a review with bibliography. Mech Syst Signal Process 18(2):199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peng Y, Cheng J, Liu Y, Li X, Peng Z (2018) An adaptive data-driven method for accurate prediction of remaining useful life of rolling bearings. Front Mech Eng 13(2):301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pham HT, Yang BS (2010) Estimation and forecasting of machine health condition using ARMA/GARCH model. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(2):546–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qian Y, Yan R, Gao R (2017) A multi-time scale approach to remaining useful life prediction in rolling bearing. Mech Syst Signal Process 83:549–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qiu H, Lee J, Lin J, Yu G (2003) Robust performance degradation assessment methods for enhanced rolling element bearing prognostics. Adv Eng Inf 17(3):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rafiee J, Tse PW, Harifi A, Sadeghi MH (2009) A novel technique for selecting mother wavelet function using an intelli gent fault diagnosis system. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):4862–4875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rai A, Upadhyay S (2018) Intelligent bearing performance degradation assessment and remaining useful life prediction based on self-organising map and support vector regression. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 232(6):1118–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rao BKN, Pai PS, Nagabhushana TN (2012) Failure diagnosis and prognosis of rolling-element bearings using artificial neural networks: a critical overview. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol 364, No. 1). IOP Publishing, p 012023Google Scholar
  45. Reuben LCK, Mba D (2014) Bearing time-to-failure estimation using spectral analysis features. Struct Health Monit 13(2):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shao Y, Nezu K (2000) Prognosis of remaining bearing life using neural networks. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 214(3):217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Si XS, Wang W, Hu CH, Zhou DH (2011) Remaining useful life estimation—a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Oper Res 213(1):1–14MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh S, Howard CQ, Hansen CH (2015) An extensive review of vibration modelling of rolling element bearings with localised and extended defects. J Sound Vib 357:300–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sloukia F, El Aroussi M, Medromi H, Wahbi M (2013) Bearings prognostic using mixture of gaussians hidden markov model and support vector machine. In: 2013 ACS international conference on computer systems and applications (AICCSA). IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  50. Tian Z, Wong L, Safaei N (2010) A neural network approach for remaining useful life prediction utilizing both failure and suspension histories. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(5):1542–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang W (2007) An adaptive predictor for dynamic system forecasting. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(2):809–823MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang D, Tsui KL (2017) Statistical modeling of bearing degradation signals. IEEE Trans Reliab 66(4):1331–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang Y, Peng Y, Zi Y, Jin X, Tsui KL (2015) An integrated Bayesian approach to prognositics of the remaining useful life and its application on bearing degradation problem. In: 2015 IEEE 13th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN). IEEE, pp 1090–1095Google Scholar
  54. Yan R (2007) Base wavelet selection criteria for non-stationary vibration analysis in bearing health diagnosis, Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest. AAI3275786Google Scholar
  55. Yiakopoulos CT, Antoniadis IA (2005) Cyclic bispectrum patterns of defective rolling element bearing vibration response. Forsch Ingenieurwes 70(2):90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Wang K (2013) Fault diagnosis and prognosis using wavelet packet decomposition, Fourier transform and artificial neural network. J Intell Manuf 24(6):1213–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao M, Tang B, Tan Q (2016) Bearing remaining useful life estimation based on time–frequency representation and supervised dimensionality reduction. Measurement 86:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abbas Rohani Bastami
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aref Aasi
    • 1
  • Hesam Addin Arghand
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Abbaspour School of EngineeringShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations