This study presents a new regularized penalty form to carry out material topology optimization of structures. In general, the regularization form of typical SIMP has been used to reduce material discontinuity of densities which describe boundaries of finite elements and finally provide numerical stability in sensitivity analysis of optimization procedures and the problem of 0–1 formulation. However, optimal solutions of the regularized SIMP depend on penalty parameters such as typical SIMP, since penalty relation of Young’s modulus and density of regularized SIMP is similar to that of typical SIMP in spite of regularization. In this paper, the penalty relationship between Young’s modulus and material density of typical SIMP becomes extended by multiplying it with a moved and regularized form of a material indication function, i.e., Heaviside function. The new penalization method does not depend on filter methods for free-checkerboards; therefore, computational savings can be obtained. Numerical examples demonstrate that the incorporation of moved and regularized Heaviside function in the SIMP leads to convergent solutions with clear boundaries between materials and no materials and without checkerboard patterns.
Structural topology optimization SIMP 0–1 formulation Material indication function Moved and regularized Heaviside function
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research was supported by a grant (code# NRF-2017R1D1A1B03031350) from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korea government.
Belytschko T, Xiao SP, Parimi C (2003) Topology optimization with implicit functions and regularization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 57:1177–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendsøe MP, Haber R (1993) The Michell layout problem as a low volume fraction limit of the homogenization method for topology design: an asymptotic study. Struct Optim 6:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolations in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69:635–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz AR, Bendsøe MP (1992) Shape optimization of structures for multiple loading conditions using a homogenization method. Struct Optim 4:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz RI, Sigmund O (1995) Checkerboards patterns in layout optimization. Struct Optim 10:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii D, Chen BC, Kikuchi N (2001) Composite material design of two-dimensional structures using the homogenization design method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50:2031–2051MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest JK, Prevost JH, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection function. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61:238–254MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haftka RT, Guerdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization—third revised and expanded edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug EJ, Choi KK, Komkov V (1986) Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems. Academic Press, OrlandozbMATHGoogle Scholar
Kumar AV, Gossard DC (1996) Synthesis of optimal shape and topology of structures. J Mech Des 118:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee DK, Shin SM (2007) Numerical aspects of element- and nodal-based material topology optimization of structures. J Solid Mech Mater Eng 1(5):656–666MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee DK, Shin SM (2015) Optimizing structural topology patterns using regularization of Heaviside function. Struct Eng Mech 55(6):1157–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahlevani Z, Ebrahimi R (2013) Optimization of specific die profiles in thin walled tube extrusion. IJST, Trans Mech Eng 37(M2):203–215Google Scholar
Sigmund O (2001) A 99 topology optimization code written in Matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16(1):68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar