Advertisement

Topological Optimal Material Design of Structures with Moved and Regularized Heaviside Function

  • Dongkyu Lee
  • Soomi ShinEmail author
Research paper
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

This study presents a new regularized penalty form to carry out material topology optimization of structures. In general, the regularization form of typical SIMP has been used to reduce material discontinuity of densities which describe boundaries of finite elements and finally provide numerical stability in sensitivity analysis of optimization procedures and the problem of 0–1 formulation. However, optimal solutions of the regularized SIMP depend on penalty parameters such as typical SIMP, since penalty relation of Young’s modulus and density of regularized SIMP is similar to that of typical SIMP in spite of regularization. In this paper, the penalty relationship between Young’s modulus and material density of typical SIMP becomes extended by multiplying it with a moved and regularized form of a material indication function, i.e., Heaviside function. The new penalization method does not depend on filter methods for free-checkerboards; therefore, computational savings can be obtained. Numerical examples demonstrate that the incorporation of moved and regularized Heaviside function in the SIMP leads to convergent solutions with clear boundaries between materials and no materials and without checkerboard patterns.

Keywords

Structural topology optimization SIMP 0–1 formulation Material indication function Moved and regularized Heaviside function 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant (code# NRF-2017R1D1A1B03031350) from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korea government.

References

  1. Belytschko T, Xiao SP, Parimi C (2003) Topology optimization with implicit functions and regularization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 57:1177–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendsøe MP, Haber R (1993) The Michell layout problem as a low volume fraction limit of the homogenization method for topology design: an asymptotic study. Struct Optim 6:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolations in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69:635–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendsøe MP, Soares CAM (1993) Topology design of structures. Kluwer, NorwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50:2143–2158MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byun JK, Lee JH, Park IH (2004) Node-based distribution of material properties for topology optimization of electromagnetic devices. IEEE Trans Magn 40:1212–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng G, Olhoff N (1981) An investigation concerning optimal design of solid elastic plates. Int J Solids Struct 17(3):305–323MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diaz AR, Bendsøe MP (1992) Shape optimization of structures for multiple loading conditions using a homogenization method. Struct Optim 4:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diaz RI, Sigmund O (1995) Checkerboards patterns in layout optimization. Struct Optim 10:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujii D, Chen BC, Kikuchi N (2001) Composite material design of two-dimensional structures using the homogenization design method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50:2031–2051MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guest JK, Prevost JH, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection function. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61:238–254MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haftka RT, Guerdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization—third revised and expanded edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haug EJ, Choi KK, Komkov V (1986) Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems. Academic Press, OrlandozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar AV, Gossard DC (1996) Synthesis of optimal shape and topology of structures. J Mech Des 118:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee DK, Shin SM (2007) Numerical aspects of element- and nodal-based material topology optimization of structures. J Solid Mech Mater Eng 1(5):656–666MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee DK, Shin SM (2015) Optimizing structural topology patterns using regularization of Heaviside function. Struct Eng Mech 55(6):1157–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pahlevani Z, Ebrahimi R (2013) Optimization of specific die profiles in thin walled tube extrusion. IJST, Trans Mech Eng 37(M2):203–215Google Scholar
  20. Sigmund O (2001) A 99 topology optimization code written in Matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16(1):68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zienkiewicz OC, Campbell JS (1973) Shape optimization and sequential linear programming. In: Gallagher RH, Zienkiewicz OC (eds) Optimum structural design. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 109–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringSejong UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Research Institute of Industrial TechnologyPusan National UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations