Cable Tension Estimation for Suspen-Dome Structures Based on Numerical Method

  • Zhiguang Yang
  • Bing Liang
  • Haiqing Liu
  • Zhongwei ZhaoEmail author
Research Paper


Suspen-dome structures have been widely adopted due to their superiority over traditional structures. Cable condition is crucial to the safety of suspen-dome structures, especially the magnitude of cable force. However, thus far, investigations on estimating the tension in this type of structure remain lacking. In this study, double-element method was initially developed to simulate cables, and its accuracy was validated. Tension compensation method was adopted to ensure that the cable force is equal to the designed value. Then, transient analysis was conducted based on an actual suspen-dome structure. The dynamic responses derived based on the overall structures and the simplified models were compared, and the reliability of the simplified models was validated. Finally, parametrical analysis was conducted to investigate the influence of support stiffness and cable-bending stiffness on the fundamental frequency of cables. A cable tension estimation program, which was suitable for suspen-dome structures, was updated. Results indicate that vibration method can maintain good accuracy when used in suspen-dome structures.


Cable force estimation Double-element method Bending stiffness Support stiffness Transient analysis 



This work was financially supported by the State Key Research Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2016YFC0801404 and 2016YFC0600704).


  1. Chen T, Su C, Ma H (2014) Study on the development of new-type cable elements for static analysis of cable structures. Eng Mech 31(2):46–52Google Scholar
  2. Croll JGA (2000) Bending boundary layers in tensioned cables and rods. Appl Ocean Res 22(4):241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hu J, Wang L, Zhao Y (2007) A catenary cable element for the nonlinear analysis of cable structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 34(11):29–32Google Scholar
  4. Humar JL (1990) Dynamics of structures. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaveh A, Ghazaan MI (2018) A new hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm for optimal design of large-scale dome structures. Eng Optim 50(2):235–252MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaveh A, Rezaie M (2015) Optimum topology design of geometrically nonlinear suspended domes using ECBO. Struct Eng Mech Int J 56(4):667–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaveh A, Rezaie M (2016) Topology and geometry optimization of single layer domes utilizing colliding bodies optimization. Sci Iran 23(2):535–547Google Scholar
  8. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2011) Geometry and topology optimization of geodesic domes using charged system search. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(2):215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaveh A, Rezaei M, Shiravand MR (2018) Optimal design of nonlinear large-scale suspendome using cascade optimization. Int J Sp Struct 33(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim KW, Lee JW, Yoo WS (2014) Unwinding motion of cable by taking into consideration effect of bending on cable. Int J Non-Linear Mech 65:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Larsen A, Larose GL (2015) Dynamic wind effects on suspension and cable-stayed bridges. J Sound Vib 334:2–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ni YQ, Ko JM, Zheng G (2002) Dynamic analysis of large-diameter sagged cables taking into account flexural rigidity. J Sound Vib 257(2):301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ricciardi G, Saitta F (2008) A continuous vibration analysis model for cables with sag and bending stiffness. Eng Struct 30(5):1459–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sousa R (2011) The influence of bending and shear stiffness and rotational inertia in vibrations of cables: an analytical approach. Eng Struct 33(3):689–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spak K, Agnes G, Inman D (2014) Parameters for modeling stranded cables as structural beams. Exp Mech 54(9):1613–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Treyssède F (2010) Vibration analysis of horizontal self-weighted beams and cables with bending stiffness subjected to thermal loads. J Sound Vib 329(9):1536–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang R, Gan Q, Huang Y, Ma H (2011) Estimation of tension in cables with intermediate elastic supports using finite-element method. J Bridge Eng 16(5):675–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wolfe P (1992) The effect of bending stiffness on inextensible cables. Int J Eng Sci 30(9):1187–1192MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xie X, Li X (2014) Genetic algorithm-based tension identification of hanger by solving inverse eigenvalue problem. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 22(6):966–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yan B, Yu J, Soliman M (2015) Estimation of cable tension force independent of complex boundary conditions. J Eng Mech 141(1):060140151–060140158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zárate BA, Caicedo JM (2015) Effects of cable dynamics in the modeling of cable-stayed bridges under seismic excitation. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 15(4):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao Z, Chen Z (2016) Analysis of door-type modular steel scaffolds based on a novel numerical method. Adv Steel Constr 12(3):316–327MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhao Z, Chen Z, Yan X, Xu H, Zhao B (2016) Simplified numerical method for latticed shells that considers member geometric imperfection and semi-rigid joints. Adv Struct Eng 19(4):689–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringLiaoning Technical UniversityFuxinChina

Personalised recommendations