Advertisement

Effect of Width of RC-Web on Seismic Performance of CFST–RC Pier: Experiments

  • Raghabendra YadavEmail author
  • Baochun Chen
  • Huihui Yuan
  • Zhibin Lian
Research paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

CFST–RC pier is a modified form of CFST latticed column in which the main longitudinal limbs are connected with RC-web instead of steel tube lacings. This type of pier is constructed in tall bridges in seismic prone zones. RC-web increases the stiffness of columns, hence reducing the slenderness ratio for long columns. In this paper, an attempt has been made to obtain seismic performance characteristics of CFST–RC columns with variable widths of RC-web. Three CFST–RC piers with variable widths of RC-web were tested in the laboratory. Cyclic load test was performed to know the seismic behavior of this type of column. Under cyclic loading, the seismic performance of CFST–RC piers, such as failure modes, ductility, load displacement hysteretic curves, energy absorption capacity, strength and stiffness degradation have been studied. The results showed that the lateral load-carrying capacity and energy dissipation capacity of the columns increased with the increase in the width of RC-web, while the ductility decreased. Cracks in the RC-web and the tearing of steel tube at the base of the piers were the main failure modes of the CFST–RC piers.

Keywords

CFST Width of RC-web Seismic performance Cyclic load test Ganhaizi bridge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research described here was sponsored in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 51178118 and 51508104 China. Their support is gratefully acknowledged. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. The authors would also like to thank Binay Kumar Sah, Pratyush Jha, Nabin Basnet and Subhash Pantha for their assistance.

References

  1. Chen B-C, Wang T-L (2009) Overview of concrete filled steel tube arch bridges in China. Pract Period Struct Design Constr 14:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen B, Yan Q, Xue J (2016a) Static test and calculation method of eccentricity ratio reduction coefficient of concrete-filled steel tubular hybrid columns. J Buil Struct 37:92–102Google Scholar
  3. Chen B, Yan Q, Xue J (2016b) Experimental study on compressive property of concrete-filled steel tubular hybrid stub columns. J Build Struct 37:82–91Google Scholar
  4. Elremaily A, Azizinamini A (2002) Behavior and strength of circular concrete-filled tube columns. J Constr Steel Res 58:1567–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galambos TV (1998) Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  6. Han L-H (2000) Tests on concrete filled steel tubular columns with high slenderness ratio. Adv Struct Eng 3:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. He R, Shu X, Chen B (2012) Test on eccentrically loaded four-tube concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) laced columns of no yield point. In: 2012 international conference on civil, architectural and hydraulic engineering, ICCAHE 2012, 10 Aug 2012–12 Aug 2012. Trans Tech Publications, Zhangjiajie, pp 4658–4663Google Scholar
  8. Huang Y (2015) Seismic behavior of concrete filled steel tubular built-up columns. University of Trento, TrentoGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang Y, Briseghella B, Zordan T, Wu Q, Chen B (2014) Shaking table tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of an innovative lightweight bridge with CFST composite truss girder and lattice pier. Eng Struct 75:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karimi K, El-Dakhakhni WW, Tait MJ (2010) Performance enhancement of steel columns using concrete-filled composite jackets. J Perform Constr Facil 25:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shanmugam N, Lakshmi B (2001) State of the art report on steel-concrete composite columns. J Constr Steel Res 57:1041–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Silva A, Jiang Y, Macedo L, Castro J, Monteiro R, Silvestre N (2016a) Seismic design of composite moment-resisting frames with cfst members. Front Struct Civ Eng 10:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Silva A, Jiang Y, Castro J, Silvestre N, Monteiro R (2016b) Experimental assessment of the flexural behaviour of circular rubberized concrete-filled steel tubes. J Constr Steel Res 122:557–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Standard CN (2015) Specification for seismic test buildings. Architecture Industrial Press of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. Yadav R, Chen B, Huihui Y, Lian Z (2016a) Numerical study on the seismic behavior of CFST columns. In: 11th Pacific structural steel conference, Shanghai, pp 360–369Google Scholar
  16. Yadav R, Chen B, Yuan H, Adhikari R (2016b) Comparative analysis of reinforced concrete buildings and concrete filled steel tube buildings in Nepal. In: International conference on earthquake engineering and post disaster reconstruction planning, Nepal, pp 70–77Google Scholar
  17. Yadav R, Chen B, Yuan H, Lian Z (2017a) Analytical behavior of CFST bridge piers under cyclic loading. Procedia Eng 173:1731–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yadav R, Chen B, Yuan H, Lian Z (2017b) Experimental investigation of CFST-RC bridge piers under cyclic loading. Procedia Eng 173:1723–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yadav R, Yuan H, Chen B, Lian Z (2018) Experimental study on seismic performance of latticed CFST-RC column connected with RC web. Thin Wall Struct 126:258–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yuan H-H, Wu Q-X, Chen B-C, Lu Y-H (2016) Aseismic performance test and fem analysis of uniform sectional CFST lattice column with flat lacing tubes. Eng Mech 33:226–235Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Civil EngineeringFuzhou UniversityFuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations