Granular Soil Improvement by Using Polyester Grouts

  • Semet ÇelikEmail author
  • Payam Majedi
  • Suat Akbulut
Technical Note


For decades, grouting has been the most popular soil stabilization method. Some additives (especially waste materials) as well as cement and polymeric materials are also widely used as grout mixtures in order to lower costs and achieve the best engineering properties with early strength gain. In this study, unconfined compression and dynamic tests of grouted granular soils were conducted with different mixtures to evaluate the feasibility of using polyester, red mud and micronized clay as grouting materials. The samples were cured for 1, 3 and 7 days in order to determine early strength gain. Unconfined compressive strength of all grouted samples has increased with increasing additive percentages and curing time. The damping ratio of all grouted samples has increased with increasing curing time. The overall evaluation of results has revealed that polyester with red mud and micronized clay promising and confer potential as a candidate for grouting applications.


Grouting Granular soil Polyester Unconfined compressive strength Damping ratio 



This research was conducted by a project, numbered 2014/88, supported by the Research Development Centre of Ataturk University.


  1. Ajalloeian R, Matinmanesh H, Abtahi SM, Rowshanzami M (2013) Effect of polyvinyl acetate grout injection on geotechnical properties of fine sand. Geomech Geoeng 8(2):86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbulut S, Saglamer A (2002) Estimating the groutability of granular soils: a new approach. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 17(4):371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbulut S, Saglamer A (2004) Modification of hydraulic conductivity in granular soils using waste materials. Waste Manag 24(5):491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akbulut RK, Zaimoglu AS, Arasan S (2013) Utilization of unsaturated polyester in improvement of sand with deep mixing method. In: 5th National Geotechnical Symposium, Cukurova University, Adana (In Turkish With An English Summary) Google Scholar
  5. Al-Khanbashi A, Abdalla SW (2006) Evaluation of three waterborne polymers as stabilizers for sandy soil. Geotech Geol Eng 24(6):1603–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anagnostopoulos CA (2005) Laboratory study of an injected granular soil with polymer grouts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20(6):525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anagnostopoulos CA (2007) Cement-clay grouts modified with acrylic resin or methyl methacrylate ester: physical and mechanical properties. Constr Build Mater 21(2):252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anagnostopoulos CA, Hadjispyrou S (2004) Laboratory study of an epoxy resin grouted sand. Proc Ice-Ground Improv 8(1):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anagnostopoulos CA, Papaliangas T, Manolopoulou S, Dimopoulos T (2011) Physical and mechanical properties of chemically grouted sand. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(6):718–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anagnostopoulos CA, Kandiliotis P, Lola M, Karavatos S (2014) Improving properties of sand using epoxy resin and electrokinetics. Geotech Geol Eng 32(4):859–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arasan S, Baghernia M, Akbulut RK, Zaimoglu AS (2017) Utilization of polymers to improve soft clayey soils using the deep mixing method. Environ Eng Geosci 23(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cambefort H (1977) The principles and applications of grouting. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 10(2):57–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chun BS, Ryu DS (2000) A study on applications of polyurethane injection material for ground improvement. Ksce J Civ Eng 4(2):113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fransson Å (2001) Characterisation of a fractured rock mass for a grouting field test. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(4):331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallagher P, Conlee C, Rollins K (2007) Full-scale field testing of colloidal silica grouting for mitigation of liquefaction risk. J Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133(2):186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jamshidi M, Alizadeh M, Salar M, Hashemi A (2013) Durability of polyester resin concrete in different chemical solutions. Adv Mater Res 687:150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalkan E (2006) Utilization of red mud as a stabilization material for the preparation of clay liners. Eng Geol 87(3–4):220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karol RH (2003) Chemical grouting and soil stabilization, revised and expanded. Crc Press, NewYorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurt ZN (2009) Investigation of the strength properties of surfactant modified clay. M.S. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum (In Turkish With An English Summary) Google Scholar
  20. Kurt ZN, Akbulut S (2014) The dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of clay nanocomposites. Clays Clay Miner 62(4):313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim SK, Hussin MW, Zakaria F, Ling TC (2009) GGBFS As potential filler in polyester grout: flexural strength and toughness. Constr Build Mater 23(5):2007–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maher MH, Ro KS, Welsh JP (1994) High strain dynamic modulus and damping of chemically grouted sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 13(2):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manfroi EP, Cheriaf M, Rocha JC (2014) Microstructure, mineralogy and environmental evaluation of cementitious composites produced with red mud waste. Constr Build Mater 67(Part:A):29–36Google Scholar
  24. Martinez-Barrera G, Menchaca-Campos C, Gencel O (2013) Polyester polymer concrete: effect of the marble particle sizes and high gamma radiation doses. Constr Build Mater 41:204–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mcintyre JE (2004) Synthetic fibres: nylon, polyester, acrylic, polyolefin. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nonveiller E (1989) Grouting, theory and practice. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohama Y (1995) handbook of polymer-modified concrete and mortars: properties and process technology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  28. Orak S (2000) Investigation of vibration damping on polymer concrete with polyester resin. Cem Concr Res 30(2):171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Şakar G, Bolat FÇ (2015) The free vibration analysis of honeycomb sandwich beam using 3D and continuum model. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mech Manuf Eng 9(6):1077–1081Google Scholar
  30. Scheirs J, Long TE (2005) Modern polyesters: chemistry and technology of polyesters and copolyesters. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Toumbakari EE, Van Gemert D, Tassios TP, Tenoutasse N (1999) Effect of mixing procedure on injectability of cementitious grouts. Cem Concr Res 29(6):867–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vipulanandan C, Ata A (2000) Cyclic and damping properties of silicate-grouted sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(7):650–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weaver K (1997) Grouting of rock and soil. Environ Eng Geosci 3(2):313–322Google Scholar
  34. Yeon KS, Han MY (1997) Fundamental properties of polymer—cement mortars for concrete repair. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Faults And Repair, Edinburg, pp 469–476Google Scholar
  35. Yesilnacar MI (2003) Grouting applications in the Sanliurfa tunnels of gap, Turkey. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 18(4):321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering FacultyAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering FacultyYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations