Soft Computing Applied to Rotation Capacity of Wide Flange Beams

Research Paper
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The rotation capacity (Ʀ) of steel beams is a physical factor that indicates the ductility of a structural member. This information is most useful in severe conditions like earthquakes, for example. In fact, Ʀ is a deciding factor in the plastic design of wide flange beams. To simplify the calculation of Ʀ, soft computing techniques could be applied. In this paper, the various attributes that govern Ʀ have been obtained from a wide experimental database, gathered from previously conducted experiments. To develop a model that accurately predicts Ʀ, four models—support vector machine, relevance vector machine, Gaussian process regression and generalized regression neural network—have been considered. These models have been tested and trained with the data collected. The models have then been validated and compared to arrive at the best one. Such efforts could go a long way in helping determine the Ʀ of wide flange steel beams and contribute to better design of structural members.

Keywords

Rotation capacity Support vector machine Relevance vector machine Gaussian process regression Generalized regression neural network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Natural Hazard Minimizing Research Group funded by Ministry of Public Safety and Security (MPSS-자연-2015-78).

References

  1. Agarwal A, Bill Triggs B (2004)3D human pose from silhouettes by relevance vector machine. In: International conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’04), Jun 2004, Washington, United States, IEEE Computer Society, II, pp 882–888Google Scholar
  2. Ceryan N (2014) Application of support vector machines and relevance vector machines in predicting uniaxial compressive strength of volcanic rocks. J Afr Earth Sci 100:634–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cevik A (2007) Genetic programming based formulation of rotation capacity of wide flange beams. Int J Constr Struct 63(7):884–893Google Scholar
  4. Cevik A (2012) Neuro-fuzzy modelling of rotation capacity of wide flange beams. Expt Syst Appl 38(5):5650–5661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen H, Xu C, Guo S (2012) Comparison and evaluation of multiple GCM’s, statistical downscaling and hydrological models in the study of climate change impacts on runoff. J Hydrol 434–435:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherkassky V, Ma Y (2004) Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Netw 17:113–126CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherkassky V, Mulier F (1998) Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Cigizoglu HK, Alp M (2006) Generalized regression neural network in modelling river sediment yield. Adv Eng Sofware 37(2):63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Djarfour N, Ferahtia J, Babaia F, Baddari K, Said E, Farfour M (2014) Seismic noise filtering based on generalized regression neural networks. Comput Geotech 69:1–9Google Scholar
  10. Gioncu V, Pectu D (1997a) Available rotation capacity for wide flange beams and beam-columns part 1. Int J Constr Struct 43(1–3):161–217Google Scholar
  11. Gioncu V, Pectu D (1997b) Available rotation capacity for wide flange beams and beam-columns part 2. Int J Constr Struct 43(1–3):219–244Google Scholar
  12. Kemp AR (1996) Ineleastic local and lateral buckling in design codes. J Struct Eng 122(4):374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li G (2002) Bracing design requirements for inelastic members. Ph.D thesis, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu K, Xu Z (2011) Traffic flow prediction of highway based on wavelet relevance vector machine. J Inf Comput Sci 8(9):1641–1647Google Scholar
  15. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pal M, Deswal S (2010) Modelling pile capacity using Gaussian process regression. Comput Geotech 37(7–8):942–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smola AJ, Scholkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199–222MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Specht D (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2(6):568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Srinivasulu S, Jain A (2006) A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Appl Soft Comput 6(3):295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suzuki T, Ogawa T, Ikaraski K (1994) A study on local buckling behaviour of hybrid beams. Thin Walled Struct 19:335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang F, Gou B, Qin Y (2013) Modeling tunnelling-induced ground surface settlement development using a wavelet smooth relevance vector machine. Comput Geotech 54:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNIT PatnaPatnaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringKunsan National UniversityKunsanSouth Korea
  3. 3.School of Mechanical and Building SciencesVIT UniversityVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations